All Activity
- Past hour
-
Outstanding to know since they NEVER place anything on sale, NOT ONCE have I seen this, AND they are probably the highest priced aircraft out there for that sim. I have almost pulled the trigger several times, but held off. Flying Iron has crushed the WW2 scene in MSFS. HIGHLY recommend all their products. They are working a B-17 now for MSFS 2024 and then the team said they were redirecting all their focus to wrapping up the A-7. Really impressed with them.
-
thanks i will give that a try
-
Seems like after the engine is warmed up, I can move the mixture out of the cutoff position without killing it. The lever is moving in the forward position as normal visually. Most planes I start cranking the prop. When the engine starts to fire, I move the mixture lever to the auto lean or rich position. On the corsair I try to move it out of the cutoff position it just kills the engine. Seems backwards
-
I saw the discord post of Prowler and it's always the same. "WE did everything possible while ED is doing nothing"..... same sh*t, different day. I don't like Discord at all but i visit RBs discord from time to time and just search for posts from Prowler to see if he wrote something new. The one on thursday was no surprise in my opinion. The same attempt of putting pressure on ED as so many times since April '24. I mean come on.... yesterday someone was talking about all the other modules which were announced especially the MiG-23 and his answer was: "MiG-23? 2 months for being sent to ED for testing" .... the same user asked if that means that we might have had it right now already and he answered "most defintely".... Really????? Is there anyone here taking this guy still serious? The "statement" from thursday is just another move in his strange game he's playing.... But as i said - just my opinion.
-
What does it even mean? Hornet is not big?! Viper is not either? (it leaves EA with next update) A-10C? Also many helicopters and warbirds to choose from as released modules and including 3 Razbam jets. Read above and think again. Are these your favorite? Surprisingly short list for such early release. It proves how good it is.
-
planned for summer 2025 AN/AAQ-33 Advanced Targeting Pod?
Northstar98 replied to Kayos's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
I wonder if they went for the realistic option in the first place, I wonder how much of an issue people grumbling about a display light or targeting pods not having far beyond the resolution they should have would be, or if there'd be much grumbling at all. -
I have read everything that is written above. I got this error today. I completed the mission twice and made mistakes twice. After the bombs exploded. After the attack of the enemy forces, the 3rd and 4th wnullere not far away, I flew behind the 1st.
-
We're working on it.
-
Summer Sale Extended | DCS Update | F-16C and F/A-18C New Features
Beirut replied to Graphics's topic in Official Newsletters
It's cool. -
I’m hoping that eventually they’ll be added to the map table. That would be cool.
- Today
-
tell please, what exact settings have you changed? Turbo mode drops my fps about two times, and I cant understand why
-
sudoflux joined the community
-
Кто нибудь знает, как скачать звуковой мод Echo 19?
-
Summer Sale Extended | DCS Update | F-16C and F/A-18C New Features
Beirut replied to Graphics's topic in Official Newsletters
Nobody has a sense of humour. I was just having fun with the wording. I mean, c'mon, everyone want to be extra special. Need Nick Grey to pop in with that magnificent voice: "Everything is fine... you're awllll extra special pilots to us." -
draconus started following Summer Sale Extended | DCS Update | F-16C and F/A-18C New Features
-
Yes making good progress and on schedule, all being well the campaign should be sent to ED at the end of August!
-
The "size" of a conflagration is determined by the number of fires - DCS isn't really good at simulating fires, and you may have noticed that fires really are 2D 'billboards' with low-resolution artwork pained on. Trying to make this a better experience by controlling the size of fires proved not to be worth the effort, so what I call 'size' is really number of burning cells. Hitting the fire is a combination of velocity and altitude (of course). Simplistic though it may be, the fire-fighting module simulates dropping the fire correctly (if near-instantaneous) using simple vector algebra. So your best bet would be flying slow, and release directly above the flames. Since (again) fire in DCS is (sadly) a purely visual effect, you can fly into the flames without being affected by heat nor updraft.
-
Flappie started following winget - incorrect DCS version identified - command line
-
winget - incorrect DCS version identified - command line
Flappie replied to Bucic's topic in Installation Problems
Hi gents. I don't know winget at all. Can you please tell me which commands to use in order to get the wrong version displayed? If possible without the need of installing DCS. -
I think 32 is right, but yes that first instance of 42 seems to be a typo. The next instance correctly identifies it as either bad or cannon round indicator. Here is original We must remember though that whatever FC3 taught us about the HUD is wrong. It is really more like a watered down Su-27 HUD with MiG-29 symbols. In the L-18 manual and its description of the HUD, those central numbers are called only “distance to turning point of the route in navigation/landing mode”
-
fixed JTAC unresponsive in multiplayer, both ST and MT...
Flappie replied to Callsign JoNay's topic in Multiplayer Bugs
I've just answered here: