Frosty2124

That's hypoxia my guy, make sure you're oxygen is turned on

The what? can you provide some more info, iirc the Pitot is already attached to the aircraft

if you have tangible evidence that the aircraft isn't performing as it should, provide the Devs with the relevant footage and tracks, and the relevant performance data that demonstrates how it should perform, and I'm certain that devs will make the necessary adjustments. otherwise you want to be wary of flaming, by saying "it don't fly right" and not saying what it isn't flying right in accordance with. you come of as having a weak argument and a bit of a silly goose.

ok, but what's your point? you don't like the way it feels? no one is forcing you to fly it

Why so salty ? There's nothing wrong with the cat, she's an old girl which more modern designs have taken lessons from and improved upon. It's the most faithful representation of an aircraft we have currently in DCS, and shes a challenge to fly. Just because you don't like something doesn't mean that it is automatically bad . based on the data and SME opinion it flies like it should, and when someone finds new data that highlights an inconsistency, HB change and update it. it'll never be perfect but all the constructive critiquing helps to get it ever closer I'll also pick up all the toys and put them back in the pram for you

That's not how that works chief . the discount is to encourage sales, not due to the fact that its "poor" this isn't a balanced game....or a used car dealership.

Thats a cool as hell photo

Typhoon is good, but the numbers quoted aren't feasible. Sincerely, a Typhoon SME

The aircraft has been designed with SME input, we got what we paid for, a realistic representation. also, the tomcat is still in service and the typhoon does have a substantial operational history.

Zuni's are incredibly draggy

i think i just fell in love so what was the point you were trying to make?

yes, and as i eluded to above, the ability to disable this feature is coming for now, just refresh the aircraft till you get the ACM panel you want, ergo effectively moot at this point. hope this helps

agreed, the ACM panel falling off (and associated field expedient fixes) is part of this. the ACM panel fixes form part of the looks of the cockpit too welcome to military aviation, it's a myth that everything works all the time every time, I spent 7 years on Eurofighter and can attest to this first hand even on delivery jets (with less than 50 hours). I appreciate your preferences and can sympathise with what your saying, I'd have loved my jets to have arrived from the factory and been able to go straight on ops. but sadly what your expectations are, are unrealistic both in terms of back than and even nowadays also, i believe that that when finalised you'll be able to disable this feature iirc, so effectively your concerns are moot.

iirc and I might be wrong but aren't there new g effects? that last issue might be related

Maintenance issues and temporary fixes are arguably the meat and potatoes of realism. if we were going further, realistically you'd be rolling a dice every time you started the jet as to whether or not you'd have a 100% capable aircraft, even then you could brick the radar on launch, or have a system go INOP in flight. as to your points: 1) its random what fix will be mounted if anything, I'm sure that if its that disheartening for you, a well worded letter to HB might result in a refund if you surrender the product although, you are receiving the product you purchased. 2) liveries are the bulk of the file size, as people have already previously said it'd be somewhat prohibitive to include every livery ever. that said if you have the storage the files page on the website will have a multitude of liveries for you to download.

so from my experience, anything above safety only dictates where the jets are allocated for example, the display jet is likely going to be a <profanity>box, and the sqns will focus on keeping the reliable aircraft mission ready, we had a load of hangar queens across the fleet and they were used as rob jets to facilitate the rest of the fleet. there were an number of jets where you could reliably tell what was going to be wrong with them, DASS, SMS, FLIR, etc, and they got reputations.

it's not just old stuff, the amount of stuff I've seen inop or speed taped on typhoon will blow your mind

currently yes iirc

its called taking turns

the multithreading update is a massive step in the development of DCS world, HB postponing stuff is giving ED the chance to take credit for what they have done. this shows HB's support for ED and demonstrates cooperation between the 2 organisations.

what i think iron mike is saying is that ED absolutely deserve to take the spotlight with this update, and HB is allowing them to do so.

i did, he said "go look at the manual," I reckon if you were nicer, people would be more willing to help, maybe its time to remove the chip you have on your shoulder.

the Dev's are very busy, the resources exist for a reason, you should always default to the approved data set first, if it isn't in there then ask the question.

the engagement window for a ICBM with something as small as a phoenix would be tiny, and the tomcat would have to be way behind enemy lines, which means there are bigger problems occurring, generally ICBM interception was undertaken by land and sea based missiles (and satellites with frickin laser beams attached to their heads if rumours are to be believed). in short whilst YES an phoenix COULD, the parameter for such an engagement are so niche that its effectively impossible yeah, but ICBMs don't, the B stands for ballistic, in reference to their flight trajectory; basically straight up and then down. there were nuclear tipped cruise missiles, maybe this is where there is some confusion?

in what facet was i wrong pray tell? try not to be salty, this forum is for intellectual and calm discussion. and it's bad for you blood pressure. you've been advised to suck it up and move on, let all try and do that.