Ala13_ManOWar
-
Posts
3501 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Ala13_ManOWar
-
-
14 minutes ago, SebastianR said:
Free trial include new 2.0 or the "new" 1944?
Yes, it does.
-
Again, not MY opinion, it's the facts said and explained everywhere, which apparently you don't read, by ED itself, not my opinion. Can you read?
On the other hand, that BS you just came around with is just BS and your opinion, not a fact at all. The "you already own this product" sign only means it's difficult to tell the software how to handle two maps with same names covering same areas in the store and in the game itself plus in two selling platforms (Steam problems on top), only that. And no, this is factually the old version Normandy subforum section, which means it's dedicated to a deprecated product no longer available for purchase. Anybody arriving now to the store wanting to buy a Normandy map will only find N2, there's no more any more. Are you speaking of Normandy 1.0 map? No? Then you ARE in the wrong subforum speaking nonsense just because you want to bear attention into you and in the actual forum your stupid post would be buried quickly among many other threads while you believe you can trick everybody, but you don't trick anyone. And that's a fact, not opinion
.
-
It is simple to install, very simple and instructions are quite clear. I also have that mod, and quite advisable since it's way better than the default control in the Warthog. But it's an axis and should be configured in axis controls' page.
-
5 hours ago, Shibbyland said:
While we're here tho, do you guys use manual RPM for dogfighting? The combat manifold pressure (I think its 1.35 ATA) seems to coincide with an automatic RPM below that which can be used for 30mins in combat.
In combat it's always better to use auto governor, it's too much of a hassle to control that in the middle of a combat and exactly that was the point of Komandogerat.
-
Yep, Roald Dahl tells that in his biography. Also he had an accident for looking only the T when someone forgot to change it when the wind changed
. But I believe it was pre-war times perhaps? I don't know if they kept that practice during wartime.
-
Anyhow, funnily enough, this is old Normandy subforum if I'm not mistaken?
1 hour ago, Swson said:Second point : I don’t agree at all about your view, having two different companies making two different maps is not an issue to merge them if business or market is valuable for that. Companies can merge or establish a punctual commercial agreement except if there is a strong technical reason not to do so which I doubt knowing quite well the techno used. So let’s continue to push for that.
You don't get it, you can agree or not, that's not my point, it's Dev's word about the subject. Right now, cannot be done and it won't happen. Period.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, snak said:
I cannot seem to down load normanby 2, the system says i have paid for it but i cannot download it. is it called normandy 2
You don't have to, the regular update will do it for you. You won't see a "new module available" sign nor have to download as per usual. You won't either have two different Normandy maps, new one (update) take over the old one place. I believe it should be now called Normandy 2 in the module manager.
-
1 hour ago, Art-J said:
@Ala13_ManOWarMind you, I believe he's trying to assign two digital inputs, not an analog axis. All warbirds have separate "rudder left/right" commands available and some have even rudder "left/righ 1 notch" as well. I don't know why he can't assign these, however, but, owning ordinary Warthog throttle, I don't know what this Deltasim mod is and how it works.
Quite true, for his words I assumed they were axis. My bad XD.
-
No separated map, you'll have only one either v1.0 or v2.0.
-
That's weird, as far as I remember never was a left rudder and right rudder binding as separated controls, it was rudder all the way only. Maybe you tried to gather old module bindings saved somewhere from old versions? Try checking what you have at saved games X:\Users\User\Saved Games\DCS\Config\Input\TF-51D\joystick folder. There might be something going on there.
If you see nothing, you can try emptying that folder (save it somewhere else just in case) and check if controls table keeps showing that in game. Then you can reset controls one by one (they can be loaded manually from those folders you saved).
-
5 hours ago, Extranajero said:
It's also a fiction that wartime RAF pilots mention in the books they wrote. Maybe it's all a conspiracy theory. But anyway...
Never checked RAF pilots' memoirs in particular, but no need for conspiracies, most biographical books are novels BTW. It's a well known veterans' effect when they go wild on their memories, sometimes true memories even if distorted at times, sometimes they aren't even memories but things they think they lived but no, it's memories they think they have but it's other fellow pilot's memory they have listened to so many times they confused them with their own. I've seen it and veterans recalls need to be taken with a grain of salt too many times mate. It's not their memories, everyone's memories happens to be like that, and specially when they're very old ones.
-
If you didn't use it since sometime ago, maybe some of your controls settings have changed? I flew it not long ago and it was as usual. Will try anyway.
-
1 minute ago, Miro said:
I know trees are colidable sience 1.5, i mean colissions on warbirds at normandy are more realistic now, earlier when You touch tree you exploded immediatelly. Now collisions look more "soft", You breaking airframe, but don't explode, and this is good.
Interesting, I believe I had seen something on the like before but it's nice more people confirm it, and if it's a new enhanced feature of N2 even better for sure
.
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, chn6 said:
First of all, we can confirm that the aerodynamic simulation of the P-51D is very good. Thanks to the real P-51D test and the efforts of the pilots, TFC has presented a DCS that can be called a digital artwork to players around the world: P -51D.
However, because TFC does not have Bf-109 and other models, so far, the aerodynamic simulation of DCS: Bf-109K-4 is not ideal. For a simple example, DCS: Bf-109K-4 cannot enter the spin at all.
Bf-109 is the most well-known and most fancied model among World War II fighters. As fans of World War II fighters, we are very disappointed that we cannot drive the more simulated Bf-109 in DCS.
In fact, there are already organizations that have fully flyable original Daimler-Benz DB605 engine Bf-109G, as well as various other models of Bf-109. I very much hope that ED can contact them and turn the legendary fighter Bf-109 into a digital artwork like P-51D (or a digital copy that will last forever in the world).
Even, can you ask TFC to buy a Bf-109 they repaired, if the money is not enough, we global DCS and Bf-109 enthusiasts can donate together?
Please contact Hangar10
Mate, it depends on what you call a 109, which I'm pretty aware most
LW bigotsLuftwhinners109 more eager fans say they aren't, but TFC owns, has owned, or at least have had access to non less than a couple Me109J (yes, that was their official factory name, HA1112 M1L is their builder name, Buchón was their nickname and most people know them by that) which means, yes, they know the thing better than you and me no matter what.Anyhow, no worries, Hangar 10 red 7 (another Buchón, converted with DB605 to G-4 standard) has showed not far ago in Flying Legends with Klaus Plasa at the controls, and we know they have contacted, talked, and what not to all of them to refine the module, not to mention Erich Brunotte LW veteran (which passed away recently) we all knew here helping with the module, being interviewed and testing the modules back in time, 109 but also Dora which he flew both.
The problem is not they haven't contacted, talked, and what not, to those people you point out and more in order to get as much info as possible about all of that. But the problem is virtual pilots wanting the 109 to be something it is not… and I can tell you other games are to blame for that, ahem…
Every module in DCS is a piece of artwork as you realized, and 109 isn't less, it's just enthusiasts expect something unreal from 109. It's just a plane, and the best plane in the game performance wise by the way, but as a plane it has it's own problems, vices, and many things most people don't know/realize because a story in a book never tells those subtleties. Not long ago there was another thread about the apparent lack of spins, but they took a look at it and IIRC it was found it is correct as it is, spins could be developed, but slats prevent the thing to develop further so you don't get to watch it almost ever, even if unwanted and you truly push it to spin on purpose. It might not look like it, but the plane is stalled all the way, and spin starts but slats stop it, or something like that (can't recall every detail of the thing). You can search for those older threads to see what was talked back then (the 109 has produced dozens of threads about 109 performance BTW, you can check and read plenty about that if you will) and every time they have looked at it it just fulfils what charts say, so… 
-
5
-
-
I think I read some mods explaining it's a very old technology and they probably couldn't just "expand" it even if they wanted to. It'd need to be a whole new map and since NTTR is the least interesting map (not because I say so, apparently users' stats, sells and the like, says so) they wouldn't probably do that. If they did It'd be nice to have, of course, I like that map for testing and training and it's a nice map, but I don't think It'll happen, at least any time soon.
-
I believe collision with trees has been there since quite a time now. It wasn't a thing on DCS 1.5, or the like, but trees can be collided not long after that IIRC though I can't remember what version introduced it.
Yes, it's a nice feature so people, specially on warbirds, can't exploit it online like before
.
-
Second point, read the zillion other threads about that telling Channel and Normandy maps are made by two different companies with different technology hence no way to join them.
First point, to be fair whenever you are on the ground terrain heights do look huge and very noticeable. BUT, whenever you go pass with your aeroplane thinking I'll see and identify this or that very well known spot so clearly because I know it by heart, I live there, I've walked, ran, biked, whatever all the place and I know the thing pretty well… yeah, from the air those huge things look tiny, even flying in a little GA not specially fast, still those things are just tiny no matter how slow and low you get with your aeroplane. It all is so tiny. And that example I mean in real life, I can tell by own experience since my home used to be in a well noticeable hill, it's even named like that, then again when I first saw it from the plane when I got my license I flipped out, the huge hill (and it is, I've walked bottom to top many times) is just a smallish barely noticeable bump on the ground. I believe they call it perspective, and yes, it happens.
-
4 hours ago, Hippo said:
Note "a" and not "the" discounted price. I can't understand why they didn't just provide this information in the e-mail.
True, didn't realize that subtle detail when I read it. Thanks for the heads up, I'm no English native and sometimes I miss things like that, good to know so I can better advice squad mates and the like
. Anyhow apparently there will be something even in the future, though now I don't know what there will be . Hope it's just semantics and the discount will be there even for the shy ones.
-
1
-
-
I believe updated FAQ says the update can be bought at any time should you opt out of the update right now. Anyhow you can check it there, just in case.
-
1
-
-
We all have that warning, mods have already said you can dismiss it. As long as the price stated is right, 9.99 or 14.99 depending on your previous map, it's fine. It'd a problem only if you don't see that and it's tagged like a full "new buy" map.
-
I believe it might be different things, 9.90 is the Normandy 1 + Channel map owner price tag, 14.90 is the only Normandy 1 OR Channel map price tag. Maybe Steam isn't recognizing the double ownership if you have them both. People is commenting on some Steam issues, I guess it might be it.
-
No way, they're separate and different maps.
-
You bought/you have in your account is literally the same. I hardly doubt there's a single difference on that.
-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, 4eyes said:
All this saddens me. It's all about Kill Rates. So many people asking DCS to become more like War Thunder.
This +1M
.
Normandy 2 a bit flat around Paris
in DCS: Normandy 1944
Posted
I believe there are things stated in the module description still missing, so since it's an early access those will probably come later on like the extra aerodromes also said to come but not there yet.
Yep, you can start over again with your first post changing that tone of yours, it'd be really welcome
. Did you check your facts, like this is old Normandy map subforum? Did you already find the new one yet? Start there 
.