Jump to content

Duervol

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks, thats what I am aiming for. At least it sounds like a thing I am waiting for
  2. You are right, I am hoping that this will be happening and not only flight internal. Does anybody know if our JHMCS ist also capable of showing flight members? Wondering if this will be coming or not?
  3. Hello all, as Wags have posted some Updates on the progress of the L16 implementation I am wondering if this is only limited to the own flight or will there be other options in future to share these Data over the whole L16?
  4. Thank you all for your Input. Tested and used the system a lot the last days and it and some first impressions might be wrong from my side. But also I ran into some strange behaviour of the EWR, like RWR shows 3 EWR indications and in the HTS there is only one EWR shown with a 460nm to 2nm range at pgm 2 and totally misplaced and absolutely no range update. On the other Side, this was on a Multiplayer Server - as it was my mission my own tests in the editor there were absolutely no problem. But this could be also a script related thing, as we are using the Skynet IADS System - I will have an eye on it.
  5. Okay, then this is also not the point. My problem is that in most cases I cannot get any better resolution fast enough to get a nice view with my TGP. When I get close enough, e.g Killzone, then I am able to spot the SAM location easier with other Systems than with the HTS. But I dont want to get so close to get shot at - if my pinpointet resolution would be better I dont need to bring myself in Danger.
  6. Thank you, this could be an option that I have overlooked. I am mostly running the ECM in Semi and XMIT 1 - but isnt this only jamming when I get locked? Or are my capabilities always reduced by 40% and everything silent when ECM is jamming?
  7. Thanks, as I have stated above, I am aware of that and it seems that this is not my problem at the moment. What is your experiences to get a nice solution on the emitter to use JDAMS or Mav effectively with the Tpod? Is there a sweetspot for the Range? At the moment I can only trust to visual references as missile trails to locate the sam.. but for this I dont need an HTS Pod.
  8. Hello there, I am currently really struggling to get a proper triangulation to SAM emitters shown in the HAD. Sometimes they are far off, nearly 500nm on an axis - and also telling me it is PGM2. But most times my RWR is showing the Emitters and also I am just around 40-60NM away from it. When I close up to around 20nm they pop up in den HAD, but then it is also difficult to get a better triangulation than 4nm to 6000ft. Or it takes ages to get a better solution to bring other weapons in effect than only a Harm, where I can use the HAS or RUK to fight the SAM. I am also aware of the functionality to not fly directly to the Emitter instead fly a circle around it for better triangulation. Do you have any tips on how to get better Solutions? Also I am unable to triangulate EWRs - they never improve in the distance to my plane (also an SA-11 Snowdrift included) is this normal? Thanks in Advance!
  9. This feature is currently not implemented and should hopefully come in some time. You can workaround this with creating a Markpoint over your Tpod, and then make TPOD Spi to your Markpoint.
  10. Thats a nice one. How did you get that working?
  11. Thank to all, very much information and insight on this specific behaviour. Stpt height can indeed be a reason for this one, sadly I cannot recheck if it was the same at the mission itself but I will have a look at it in the future. Also learned a lot about this mode and the harm itself. Hopefully this HTS Video from today will happen soon in a Patch Cheers!
  12. I have set it to RED and also waited until the SA-11 ist deployed. Case of this Situation is a reconstruction of a Operation that was flewn yesterday. There we noticed this behaviour and I claimed that the HARM was shot without any spike to the plane rather than talking directly from a bug. Took me nearly 1 hour to recreate this specific behaviour and it was intended to shot without direct spike, let the harm overshoot an take the spike in the right spot. During my try and error for recreation, I also noticed that there is absolute no problem when the SAM is spiking the plane and the harm is released. But with the current thought, it looks like to be correct to track with the spike and not track without spike - but the overshooting would be not correct?
  13. It is indeed the question why it even overshoots? If it should fly to the steerpoint, then there is no reason for overshoot an track. Unlike my second Trackfile added in my post before, 2 of 4 harms are not overshooting, the rest ist overshooting.
  14. This is the same as I have expected it should work. Please look at the Tacview or Trackfile, I have shot a second Harm an it just passes the Steerpoint without tracking anything. Edit: Added another Trackfile with shot Harms without any targets - 2 of 4 are overshooting the steerpoint. Harm-EOM-no-target.trk
  15. Thanks for calrification this makes sense. But without any spike etc - maybe chosen the wrong target (just for a simple situation) or even the SAM is not tracking etc - the harm would just overfly the steerpoint and do nothing?
×
×
  • Create New...