Jack1nthecrack

The bug is 3 years old??? Why hasnt it been fixed by now?

Why when selecting R-27T/ET it does not give you an audible tone in BVR, Vertical Scan, or Helmet modes, but in longitudinal aiming mode it does give you a tone? Is this a bug?

@ChizhAny news regarding the R-27 and R-77, will more weapons devs be freed up after the Apache release to work on these missiles?

Page 500! This is cause for celebration Chizh, will the R-27ER and R-77 finally be updated?? I think that is the appropriate celebration!

Do your tests in MP against other people, NOT AI! AI cheat, everything is a random dice roll in THEIR favor. I had an AI Su-30 notch me vertically against a blue sky at 5km in my Su-33. Doing tests against AI and then reporting the observations is not very scientific.

+1

Awesome! I love them.

Someone is scared of fighting Flaming Cliffs 3

Are there any charts regarding the Meteor missile? Will it be based on pure fantasy?

I pay money for these full fidelity modules that I want to be as accurate as possible. I want mine and everyone else's voices to be heard and influence decisions that ED makes. We are the customers after all. Because of the community demanding realism, ED reversed their unrealistic decision to allow the F-16 to employ all 4 HARMs onboard. It's a good thing for us to have influence if we are paying. Nothing should be "hidden away" everything should be transparent.

Why does it not have a normal PN though?

When will people realize a 5in antenna with a 30mhz battery will not be this insane ECM, chaff, and notch rejecting monster that they think it will be. If that was the case then the Gripen pilots in this video wouldn't support to impact while being targeted by the enemy missile as well.

This doesn't help lol, all tracks should be reliable. The system obviously needs some work if it only half works!

Track?

What does this mean in the context of DCS, will you change the R-27 to match the DLZ simulation? Does the DLZ simulator actually show ranges a certain percentage below the RAero ranges on the missile graph so that the pilot doesn't launch close to maximum parameters, thus has a greater chance to hit the target?

Maximus could you post some tracks of the R-27 missing the 150 m/s closure rate at the specified ranges?

Hi Chizh, Is there a possibility of reducing the CCM value for the R-27ET, currently it is easily defeated with only a few flares. Two flares is enough to defeat it. This cannot be realistic?

+1

I wish Chizh would tell us the other sources he has regarding the R-27ER/ET. Are those sources more accurate than the manual?

The same can be said for a modern full fidelity Flanker like the Su-30 or even perhaps a full fidelity version of the Su-27S we already have ingame. The comparisons between the Mi-8/Huey and MiG-15/F-86 I think are not fair. Simply because the American counterparts are much more iconic compared to the Soviet ones. If only we had an Su-30 to rival the capabilities that the F-18, F-16, and JF-17 have, I think we will see a lot more sales. Enough to show that these red full fidelity aircraft are worth making, I hope ED truly is making the MiG-29A 9.12, it should hopefully change their opinion regarding red full fidelity aircraft.

On the topic of ECM, will the unrealistic timer for the Flaming Cliffs 3 aircraft be removed?

+1

Lookin forward to it!

+2

Well, since we are basing things off of thought instead of facts now I can say that I THINK you are wrong Chizh.