Get_Lo

I did read them. why?

Why do we on the F-104 forum, care about the other forums?

Meanwhile https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_F-104_Starfighter Read literally the first sentence, its not that hard.

What MFD and HUD is there in an S/ASA? Those are mainly weapon system upgrades to include newer missiles

Wrong

This module would really benefit from being the first to have it. (imo they all should, but none as important as this one) having it bindable to a single key would be fantastic.

assuming the developers play their own plane, they already have track files of the issue. Its a problem with the missile each and every time you shoot it. im sure theyre already aware of the issue but as its a Weapon its out of their control, most likely needing ED themselves to tweak the stats to make it align with reality. and if the JF-17 is anything to go by, these weapon tweaks for non-ED modules are rare and far between unless its absolutely game breaking.

I never said it was going to be flyable, I said the pre-order might align with an update or newsletter. But in most likeliness the update will be the last week of Jan. Wed-Fri.

ive heard "January update" and that only leaves 1 week left, but if we end up missing that mark im assuming RAZBAM's F15E pre-order on Feb 3rd will be in alignment with an update. but its just speculation. So unironically, 2 weeks I guess?

What are the chances anyone can tell me a little about this picture? Unless im horribly mistaken that is an AGM-130 being loaded onto an F4 and photograph is dated middle of 1990 Ive seen references to the AGM-130 in this 1984 weapon's file but apart from that any information is so scarce! any information will be appreciated. (Cover page showing it is non-restricted info)

it says TUTORIAL in the video title man, its not that hard, its just Spudknocker being Spudknocker, rushing content to beat other CCs at the expense of it being full of fluff and incorrect/absent information.

"New cyrano IVM" "Low fuel capacity" "slave the Magic" and worst of all "MULTIROLE"?!?!?!?! No INS tutorial what so ever, but instead a 10minute long AAR tutorial. and audio effects dubbed over to make it sound like a 1910s film. Good lord someone let me know when Redkite uploads his version of this, I cant go any further.

pretty much what he said, SAMP-400 HDs, fly in at 500 knots as low as comfortable and start dropping as the targets pass under the nose

hopped into the F1 after a while not flying it and noticed the pitch axis seems to "see-saw" a bit, especially with the pitch damper on, but even without it. makes doing a smooth pull very very difficult, which was previously not an issue

Im sorry but that isnt even close to what is happening. F4E and its derivatives are more common and in a wider variety of theaters than the J

ED develops all weapons now, regardless if their modules use them. this was a change after Deka's SD-10 annihilated everything that left the ground for a few months.

Still seems to be an issue for me

Any update on this? the F1 still doesnt meet its schedules in the manual and flying it under 250 knots feels like driving a boat with the anchor deployed. Hard to believe this thing was designed to have "low approach speeds" and a "High lift wing" Maybe with the EE release we can get an update FM?

@snocc_silly goose, you're going to make these guys really upset when the F1M comes out lmao

agree, I think we should step away from the game-ified RWR behavior and start making steps in the direction of realism. F1 has a good place to start because as is it doesnt give launch warnings, it would be a shame if they added it just to fit the game-y side of DCS. even RAZBAM has expressed interest in making the 530D of the 2000 not give launch warnings (or give launch warnings on lock, not on fire) because the missile is a LOBL missile and the hostile's RWR would have no way of knowing the missile is in the air because the "launch" signals the CWI emit are already emitting before the missile is launched. S-200 (Sa-5) is another good example you mentioned and im sure there are others I dont even think of.

R530EM does not use CWI or PDI guidance and guides on 2000hz radar frequency, the same frequency the radar scans on. there should be no launch warning. But there should be a lock warning. S530F is the same way when it arrives except it uses 660hz frequency.

9G was the first to incorporate solid state electronics though, no? wasnt that the whole point of the missile over the D aswell as SEAM

Can you tell me what the AIM-9G was again, last I checked it was the first solid state sidewinder and none before had it, some after it didnt even have it and youre telling me this technology existed before the AIM-9B was even around? can you explain?

A-10A is not in the same league as the harrier. harrier is way faster, way better missiles, and way better systems. Ask anyone on the server what they would rather have, 4 AIM-9P or 2 AIM-9M. harrier is cool but its just too good, we tried it when it was worse like I said, and it was still too good.

Harrier's systems are too good and it would make no sense for an attacker to have by far the best IR missiles on the server