Jump to content

umland

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About umland

  • Birthday May 6

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. not sure if they can longer affort this. Operation Barbarossa should be done. Dont understand why they only focus on new gen fighters Real fighting is in WW2 Planes not in fire and forget planes today
  2. MiG-29 and IRAQ. Redfor is missing so long Thanks a lot guys!!! very appreciate it!!!
  3. absolutely - We should be really thankful that Kate, Wags and Nic and above all devs are doing this for us!!! I can imagine how painful it is to decide if some extra info from some guys are legal to realise. I understand this guys who send this infos to ED, they want also to have the most realistic DCS. I would pay much more for a good developed plane. Hope they will enhanced the WWII Era (i am Fan) also.
  4. so last one - If they talked that BVR is close to real and they have to be careful.. Also they removed Features from the Apache64 as it was not public... I wont say its only a game. But we can discuss this until the end of the world. We all have different opinions...
  5. sure they know - they were/are pilots not "They are aviation enthusiasts (obviously) and (young) men". This sounds as they are privat pilots or teenager who never saw a F16 / F18.... ok enough - senseless... Thx
  6. Do you have noticed that mover, gonky and wombat are real jet pilots? When I read these lines seems like that to me as you missed that... Did you ever fly in real? However
  7. Maybe - this could be that I misunderstood this. But as an Expert ,what mover, gonky and wombat are, its a pitty to play only a game... That is Time Wasting also from my Side... Not sure if it was 100% ironic... Wags reaction was very carefully.. However...
  8. true- maybe its a way to fly russian birds. But I understand why mover, gonky and wombat says "Uhh". Same for me here. Its not a game, its a simulation
  9. In my opinion Matt and Nick are doing exact the right way. I am very pleased to have the Full Fidelity WW2 and modern Jets. Thanks and keep the good Work up.. I wish there will be more WW2 Planes and the old existing Planes (d9,K4) get more love. I only buy Full Fidelity, not interesting in FC4 and MAC. For me FC3 is Arcade. People who wants a easier handling of Jets should go to other products, there is enough on the Market. I understand Matt that isnt easy to do a MIG29a regarding legal reasons. For me, I can wait. The Ukraine Conflict will End and Eagle Dynamics will get their Information if a other President is elected and the World will be peaceier than today. I dont understand this discussion on DCS and FC3. DCS has already an Quick Start option for each Module to avoid procedural clicking for engine startup. You have only to learn the Weaponry, Radar Modes, etc..
  10. umland

    Thank you ED

    A big thank you from me too. The P47 is awesome. After FW190 A8 and now P47 the quality of the planes really increases. Hope you will review the FW190D9 too. For the WW2 era you are on the right way. I am really pleased for this. Well Done Devs, Matt and Kate!!!!!
  11. Indeed. Shame on you Guys, who troll here. How annoying. Sry Kate, Matt and Dev´s that you have to read and deal with this. They don't appreciate what you do for us. I think you should really lock this thread and give new announcements only in a read only thread. unbelievable...
  12. Hi Kate, Matt and Devs, take your time. From my side, I can wait. Dont excuse that it takes more time. Dont listen to Sentences such as "...Also as I'm sure you've born in mind MS FS 2020 is out by Christmas..." Thats really inappropriate from that guys. It seems to be that Releases will be faster, if that said to you. Dont understand this guys. As QuiGon said: Software development isn't very predictable unfortunately.
  13. @Maxime see your point, but pls keep in mind thats this Level of a Simulator isnt easy to program. Every time if I fly this I really pleased about the Flight Model and ground physics. As it really close to the reality. Its really a joy to fly the Fw180A8 and also the Spitfire. Hope they will rework also the Fw190D9 and Bf109K4. I am sure there will be more content in future. They really do an insane good Job here. If the Damage Model is out we will see the high Level as usual. I really prefer DCS in opposite of IL2. IL2 is a better Warthunder and Starting/Landing is a joke in Il2. Dont wont to flame Il2, but its the reallity. So in my opinion we have to be patience and hope they will adress us...
  14. @Flarpt pls calm down. Matt and the whole Dev Team does really an amazing job. We must be patience, there is a lot of to do. Never seen a product which is comparable like DCS with that complexiblity, api and superior Graphics. I am sure that they will increase the performance with vulcan and more attached cpu cores. Keep in mind its not so easy to program the whole threads and paralism in c++ >>DCS is not made with an average PC's hardware in mind. If you want to fly a professional Sim than you must have the hardware for that. Its my opinon. Whine about the current state of DCS is the wrong way. Hope they keep the good work up. I am really pleased that ED try's to give us a Simulator like this Greets, Michael
  15. lol, the inital post from cobra was clear to understand. They are already feature complete and polishing the Release Candidate Build. But they have some things to do... ".. and are now focused on ironing out any remaining major or game breaking issues.." So my Message was "Take your Time you need" nothing more.
×
×
  • Create New...