Ash Lynx

I only said those assumptions to provide context as to why I was asking the questions I am in my original post. I am mealy commenting on possibilities and did intend to put what I've said as fact, just background context.

The only question i ask about all this is, does Deka have all the relevant documentation to faithfully represent the proper integration of these western avionics. The fact were 2 were built and the project was cancelled provides a scenario of which operational documentation and design docs are lost/discarded. I am sure Deka chose this version because this was the only way of bringing the J8 to dcs. Im fine with the fact that only 2 were built, only one of these aircraft being built is the minimum to say that this aircraft existed. But its to be expected with such limited numbers also the surround reasons as to why the program was cancelled its understandable to assume data pertaining to the integration of the avionics were lost. To summarize: Does Deka have the relevant documentation on how these systems were specifically integrated with each other, or is Deka taking the approach of using documentation of each avionic system and using that to put everything together in the peace pearl package. I am asking this to better understand Deka's approach to this project and this hopefully would answer a lot of questions and clear up a lot of other peoples misconceptions.

F105 or AW-129. F105 because we are getting alot of other vietnam aircraft in development and the AW129 just to further fleshout the attack heli roster.

Might wanna update the IADS part. Its been put on hold.

The IADS interest post seems to be missing or deleted. Can someone explained why it is missing, maybe because the deal fell through or something. Just looking for official clarification to manage expectations. Thank you

Please or add a drag box to select everything.

You can also see the dynamic option in the ME in the ACLS video so its definitely a tease. If it was a oversight it wouldve only been in one video.

I think we need a wishlist item asking for better sam implementation. From what i am reading here it seems sams in DCS are simply heavily neutered versions of their real life counter parts.

Its from my observation that the way that aircraft do certain operations depends on what branch its from as with the A10 and F16 the manipulation of the SPI and SOI are very similar but the whole system is entirely different for the F18. To me its feels like you have Navy way of doing this and Airforce way of doing things.

This seems something that would definitely would be required for the dynamic campaign as well, runway bombing in order to disable an airbase although same effect could be acquired for that by loading up the next turn as a new mission, either way this would be very useful for MP. Maybe a "remove crater in x meters" function would be alot helpful this way you can not only set up a "repair runway script" but also a "repair taxiway/parking" script. Provides the same result as the OP suggested but with more versatility.

Adding these regions would add alot in terms of content and possibility to DCS and i am pretty sure there were mentions that they are working on a world map although its very far off in terms of development maybe when its alot more mature this idea could be a first implementation, adding in the middle east as the first section of the DCS world system.

Having MFD datalink and navigation in it self would be amazing especially for the MIG-29 major set up from FC3 levels apart from the obvious full fidelity treatment. Having a moving map and a SA page by it self would add alot to the aircraft at least in my opinion since Nav and Sa pages are what i use the most in all of the modules that i use.

A CH47 covers alot of eras as well although if it were to be developed a single variant would be developed with its respective avionics but its a CH47 either way. Plus we have a redfor transport already with the Mi-8.

I think having a Vietnam era Cobra and the most Advanced Cobra possible is the most likely outcome if it were to be developed. ED and 3rd parties don't really do variants unless its either a major difference or very similar so it would be easy to develop. Having the 2 cobra types mentioned would cover mostly everyone's needs mostly. But what I am speculating is the bare minimum that ED or a 3rd party would do.

I haven't seen any mention of the British variants (correct me if i'm wrong) so i am making this post just to get some attention for these variants. All i wanna know is that is there a possibility of getting these variants maybe pay a A-10C tank killer styled upgrade to whatever version the british variant closely relates to. Also if it is on the table then we need a brit voice acting the WSO. P.S: I would happily do the British voice lines.