Jump to content

barry_c

Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS, MSFS

Recent Profile Visitors

686 profile views
  1. Can you explain how I am not on topic? There are many questions to be had in my replies, I am quite literally questioning the choices here, as usual you like to twist reality.
  2. I have genuine criticisms here, you're not responding to any of them, nor is the chap above, if you disagree please address and explain why. And to avoid any doubt, I like urga products, I own Normandy and Syria, both great, but having the channel area low res is just ED all over.
  3. Go and look at the WW2 MP population 1 year ago versus today, ED have since revised that number btw, saying it's now about 50/50 IIRC. Having that area low res, plus historically inaccurate airfields, Heathrow, Farnborough, looking at you, just makes me think this is a waste of time, imagine the awkward flightpaths you'll have to take if you want to avoid the low res area, the low res area will end up completely disused and frankly ruins the potential for this map. Are people with dedicated servers expected to have to install all 3 too? Channel is bigger than normandy in Gb, Normandy 1 already isn't small, we're going to end up with ridiculous install sizes now...
  4. I already own all except channel, DCS ww2 is basically dead the last thing it needs is higher cost to entry, not everyone is well off. That's my point. And you think ED have no say in that? And also Heathrow? The famed military base what?
  5. Nice one let's leave out the channel area and create a weird L shape, thanks ED for increasing the barrier to WW2 entry even higher. Oh nice MR New player you just got the spitfire, now you just need the assets, and the map, and oh the other map, oh wait, now you need the 3rd map because maps 1 and 2 don't have the channel area... come on...
  6. There are literally hundreds of reports of heavy flak being absolutely deadly to fighters, read Pierre Closterman himself spoke about how many aircraft they'd lose to flak. If anything flak isn't accurate enough and the Regular 20/40mm AAA guns are too accurate, just as any machine guns style aa is due the DCS targeting system where it auto aims on the pilot head.
  7. Title explains it all, can't be hard to stop flak from firing when friendly aircraft are within X proximity/engaged of the enemy aircraft?
  8. Any update ED? This was reported in November...
  9. Another video from me, this one features a bunch of people, my whole squad, I think there might be some of Phil in here too: Taken from flights over the past few days/weeks, mainly the last 2-3 days though.
×
×
  • Create New...