-
Posts
6763 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Snoopy
-
Hopefully the eventual “DTC” and planning software will include setting up HMCS profiles!
-
not planned or realistic Sound notification when creating Mark Points
Snoopy replied to ZenMaster_P's topic in Wishlist
LOL now that's what we need to add to good old Bitching Betty! -
not planned or realistic Sound notification when creating Mark Points
Snoopy replied to ZenMaster_P's topic in Wishlist
The real aircraft doesn't do it so shouldn't be in the DCS versions IMO. -
Actually what he said is they are considering adding it later (although it’s the TAD not TADS in the A-10C) Which is exactly why I wish ED wouldn’t say things like that (similarly to when they initially mentioned updated TAD and 184 long in a newsletter January 2021). DCS: A-10C II Tank Killer The Hawg is already nearly complete, but we do plan to deliver some additional features in 2021 that include the ARC-210 radio, updates to the Tactical Awareness Display (TAD), changes to optically guided Maverick slewing, and the long version of the AN/ALQ-184 ECM pod.
-
Was starting the install and a lot of the reference images in Github are no longer loading.
- 26 replies
-
Home station normal ops is full tanks. In hot locations we have summer loads and deployed it’s all depended on the external muns we’re carrying.
-
Yes it’s a PDF and not planning on hosting it at another location.
-
Correct, forum limitation.
-
Worked fine a few days ago now getting this error when I start it. I can reinstall and it'll open until I configure it then get the same error. --------------------------- There was an error! --------------------------- Use Ctrl + C to copy this error and e-mail it to s13solutions@gmail.com : System.ArgumentNullException: Value cannot be null. Parameter name: path at System.IO.Directory.GetParent(String path) at KneeboardBuilder.Viewmodels.MainViewModel.BackupAircraftDefaultGroups(String _origPath) at KneeboardBuilder.Viewmodels.MainViewModel.LoadAircraftData() at KneeboardBuilder.Viewmodels.MainViewModel.Initilization() at KneeboardBuilder.Viewmodels.MainViewModel..ctor() at KneeboardBuilder.Views.MainView..ctor() --------------------------- OK ---------------------------
-
Enjoy.... https://www.v303rdfightergroup.com/index.php?pubs/v303d-fs-dcs-a10c-ii-arc-210-familiarization.138/download
-
Agreed…same thing with the long 184 and additional TAD symbology was mentioned in a newsletter two years ago.
-
Not all real world jets have the FM radio removed even with dual ARC-210s
-
Latest tail flash from the 476 Fighter Group, 76 Fighter Squadron at Moody AFB. Also updated to reflect latest door art for aircraft 647 and 660. Download here.
-
- 4
-
-
Thanks Nineline, appreciate the update!!
-
Another update and newsletter with the no mention of the A-10C II. I know what the response will be but it really does appear that the module is abandoned. Released over two years ago but we’re suppose to be patient for promised and advertised items not being included yet. It would be nice if a newsletter at least mentioned the progress of the ARC-210 instead of just telling us a programmer has been assigned. We were told 6 months (and counting) ago they were assigned.
-
Agreed it would be nice. I don’t expect it though, they didn’t even include it for the viper
-
A admire your optimism
-
The original suite modeled (3/5) you couldn’t delete mark points. The suite they say they’re modeling now you can but there are so many other things missing from the TAD, HMCS, TGP, etc. being able to delete likely won’t get added either.
-
Protections? Are you talking about dash 21 (ie intake/exhaust covers, water intrusion. Plugs)?
-
That’s why they’re asking for it, not saying it is an option currently.
-
The A-10C (v1 and v2) isn’t anywhere near a specific suite. The original release had a mixture of suite 3 and 5 features and version 2 has a few suite 7 plus features but has so many items in the TAD, HMCS, TGP, and HUD missing you couldn’t truly say ED was trying to model that suite either. it will be interesting to see how accurately the ARC-210 is modeled and if things like UFC integration and HUD projected info is included.
-
Very frustrating that we don't even get the limited info we get from AI aircraft from client aircraft. Based on things Bignewy has told me when I asked him though I am not expecting it. I think we'll get the ARC-210 and that'll be it. He said if it's not listed on the product page it isn't promised (even if mentioned in a newsletter).