ReyCandy

My brackets move, although the truth is that I had never noticed them. Yours stay fixed? I suppose that 2 brackets refers to the values that we have marked in the next waypoint. The altitude we have to be and the speed that we have marked in the mission editor. If you have the waypoint marked on the ground and at low speed, they will always be both below the scale.

Finally someone who says this. "An expensive module?" even if you buy it without discounts it will give you hours and hours of flight. Add hours of learning, reading, watching videos on YT to learn, practice, flights and start over. How much is the hour worth? Much less than the cinema, a go out to dinner or whatever you can think of. ---------------------- About learning. I start any module with this order: - Cold and dark and I learn to turn it on - Turn on, take off and land (touch and go, as many times as you want, and turn off (I do this until I take off and land safely as well as memorize the cold and dark start) - Stalls, maneuvers, knowing limits and behavior of the aircraft (Here you can do crazy things with the aircraft, It's about doing things seriously but you can also see how far it goes) - Navigation and SA (waypoints, tacan, datalink, IFF, flight plans and everything that concerns) - Countermeasures (use, evasions of SAMS and threats, ECM) - Attack A / G unguided bombs, rockets and cannon (CCIP and CCRP) - Attack A / G guided bombs, use of guidance systems - A / A fights, BVR ... (in other modules) - Finally, I fill in knowledge by flying campaigns, missions and little by little you learn small details that have been overlooked. I always use Chuck's guide as a base. YT videos to better see how to do something that is not clear to me and the official manual as a reference for specific consultations or to deepen once I complete the previous steps. (Yes, I find it more fun and intuitive to learn flying than to read and then fly. That would be tedious and this is a simulator after all. Nothing happens if you crash 100 times.)

"algunos" jaja tiene muchísimos!!! Muchas gracias por compartirlos, tenerlos en público y pasar el enlace. La verdad es que siempre me da la sensación (o quizás sea así) que en el mundo anglosajón se comparte el conocimiento y se ayuda a los demás de forma pública y libre (tanto en este tema como en otros campos que toco) y en el mundo hispanohablante se ayude también, pero parece que todo tiene que ser en grupos cerrados y con mucho secretismo, que veo que en el Cruz de San Andrés no es el caso y me alegra. (reflexión personal) En definitiva: GRACIAS.

I support the idea.

@Gringosky that's what the community is for, to help us, happy day!

For sure YES, @jwflowersii. I admit that it's very well done. I love the clear view of the HUD. It's very complete, it's used for everything. But after many attempts it still seems very bland (FOR ME, personal opinion). And you don't think that I don't try (I paid for it ... and I like the plane ...) But... pfff I finally fly more other modules but I'll keep trying and maybe one day the spark will jump.

Correct! It's the same thing I've tried to say, starting and wanting everything to work perfectly from day one is very optimistic. Neither in DCS nor in other simulators have I ever achieved that. I recommend that you start by doing simple things and give it a try. Little by little you will be accommodating DCS to your tastes.

Perhaps it's better to start by configuring the game without VR and with the minimum to start, flying the free modules and adapting to the whole environment before wanting everything to work the first time for you. All games are a bit dizzy at first and require adaptation and patience. After that period and only if you really like it, you will see that it's not difficult to handle yourself in DCS or in other games. There are many videos on YT that teach you everything. It's just about learning. Learning the environment, learning the module... If you don't like learning and you don't want to spend time reading, learning and practicing, this is definitely not for you. Think that DCS has his bugs, but everyone who is here enjoys it.

+1 Very interesting suggestion!

Try this: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3315251/

Make it and share it.

It has always been possible to create content in other civil aircraft simulators by doing outrageous things. However, doing that is in very bad taste and I don't think many people follow that kind of content.

Hopefully ED does.

I usually change the snap views to only see them by pressing the numpad keys instead of also using the 'alt'. This is easier. Then I do the process that explains '5ephir0th' and that's it. I usually use 7 and 4 for the left console, 9 and 6 for the right console. 1, 2 and 3 to zoom in on screens, MFDs ... 8 to zoom in on the HUD and 5 to zoom in on the central part. It becomes quite comfortable and accurate to start the plane with the controls being closer and still.

I did an excel sheet to record the time I fly with each model after each session. I know it sounds very obsessive, but it doesn't cost too much to do it. I also count the time online and add it. It helps me understand which module I use the most, how long time, which I haven't used and how much the module has cost me in relation to the hours I have dedicated to it. For future purchases, it makes me clear what my real tastes are.

I just finished flying with my jeff and I haven't noticed anything. If someone else can verify it or if someone has a problem. Let's see.

Fantastic skins, i love Kerbo416's work!

Sí, eso es lo que pretendo, comprender mejor esto de hacer skins. Estaría bien que mientras más seamos compartiendo skins, misiones y campañas, mejor. Ganamos todos.

I think the same. Virtually no DCS aircraft behaves like a real one. They can be as well simulated as you want, but that's what it is: simulated. The real systems are not there and many times the systems do what they are supposed to do but it really is a little programming hoax to make it look real. No serious nation is going to spy on another through DCS. It would be ridiculous... It is a very well done simulator, but nothing more. On the other hand, if someone wanted to do a Mig29 they could do it. Some systems would work more or less like the real thing and others would be invented to make them look real. I personally would not care if they are like real one or not. I have never flown and will never fly a Mig29 and I think almost no one here will. Would anyone notice? I would prefer to have a more or less correct simulation of a Mig29 or Su27 would be than to have only the FC3. This is my opinion.

I had a lot of fun with 'Operation Black Bear' and now with 'Operation Desert Thunder' too. Thanks for creating and share great campaigns!

Yes, I linked my profile to Steam and transferred it from Steam, but the store doesn't detect this. Ok, I found the solution when I was going to write to ED technical support. I guess someone else will use this post in the future. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/support In this page says: "A-10C II Tank Killer live now in the DCS ! Attention to Steam Users! Full Price: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1417260/DCS_A10C_II_Tank_Killer/ Upgrade version if you already own A-10C on Steam: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1431030/DCS_A10C_II_Tank_Killer_Upgrade/ please buy it on the Steam and then bind the license in your DCS profile" Solved, thanks!

Hi all! I bought the 'A-10C' 2 years ago (like some more modules) in the Steam version and a few months ago I switched everything to the open beta web version. I've been thinking about getting the 'A-10C II Tank Killer' but I don't see any option to upgrade on the web and on Steam it does. Should I buy the upgrade on Steam and transfer it or is there a way to do it directly on the web? Thanks.

JF-17 in actual state is a release of any other... Don't wait and enjoy it now. You will not regret.

Correct!!!

Muchas gracias por las respuestas y @Etten gracias por tan elaborada e informativa. Muchas gracias por la gran explicación.