Jump to content

odrin

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. it looks like an insect which is ewww
  2. what's the point? you can't use this on apache? you made dediated sim pit for f-18 but it will look bad flying apache?
  3. it looks uglier than the a-10. why is it do you think? imo it's because of the slanted vertical stabilizers,the skinniness of the fuselage, it looks like an f-16 with the tail split into two. here's my edit that improved the f-18's looks: imo it still looks like the diseased step brother of the su-27, but it looks better
  4. i get the ego masturbation of memorizing and doing a cold start, but once you do that a dozen times, it's just a waste of time. i'd rather focus on the actual mission instead of sitting there and doing the same actions over and over. please keep this in mind when creating apache campaign, thank you
  5. look in the related videos section, many people have explained it already.
  6. when he kept repeating he is the greatest, i broke my back from cringing so hard. how embarrassing it must be to witness them filming that.
  7. agreed about the name, from what i understand it's some kind of obscure tech-geek easter egg or reference, but i'd rather it be consistent. it should be a nickname disagree about gender neutral. it would be such a waste of time to have both female and male voice lines. females are a tiny percentage of pilots in general, just keep it male.
  8. in the decade since i bought ka-50, i have only ever purchased a-10c, f-14b, and apache. they should dispense with all the other crap and garbage and focus on apache only. quality>quantity.
  9. there has been plenty of footage where hellfires were "wasted"on individual runners. why? they may be setting up ieds, the chaingun ammo may be out, they may be in a position to ambush friendly forces. there are tons of scenarios where it's necessary to "waste" ordinances like that. do you know how many jdams were employed against infantry positions?
  10. change the optic to white hot or black hot, you're probably in normal mode
  11. Taiwan is more relevant than both. I don't care about flying 50s and 60s era aircrafts
  12. the terrain technology does not support flattening the terrain to that detail. you'd have to flatten a large swath of the terrain which will be unrealistic. this engine needs to make it possible to change elevation of terrain within 1 meter resolution. then it will be possible the terrain engine is not remotely detailed enough for ca, this was my initial consternation regarding a whole module dedicated to ca, when at the time, the map detail was even lower than depicted in your screenshot. it's just an incredibly bad project. not to mention no track physics and vehicles skid around like hovercraft. i wish they never started that priject and instead put all the time and resources to develop the terrain first.
  13. Not a fan of the region, it seems designed for UK fanboys and their harriers and other european planes. I like modern American and Russian equipment
  14. the cold war is gone and done i don't like to dwell on the past. russia and the us now fight proxy wars and they don't directly engage each other. a germany maps et in the 70s and 80s is mundane as hell
  15. I think modeling the major Air bases would be a waste of resources, smaller bases and farps were the real staging areas for many of the operations. afghanistan is a map made for the apache so i think featuring on the regions where apache operated most is truly the priority in terms of terrain selection
×
×
  • Create New...