Phoschek

I third this

But R-2508 is actually a critical area to a LOT of Southern California units.

Easy there, killer. They’re working on it. The attitude is a little bit much.

ED has already said they plan on building an older model Cobra, but personally, I’d rather see an AH-1W.

I’d love to see the CH-53, although with the way DCS is starting to have a comprehensive Army aviation catalogue... the CH-47 would fit in well.

I would love to see improved runway cratering that would take an airbase out of action (or necessitate those taxiway takeoffs that so many people train for in PvP). AFAIK landing gear can become damaged currently, but otherwise nothing more serious occurs.

I’d rather see someone that will develop it in the next 3-4 years, not 10.

How about that military trainer Christian Eagle?

It only takes away from the legitimate ideas being discussed when one person absolutely spams the ever loving hell out of this forum with silly thread after thread every day. I would much rather have EDs time and attention go to legitimate causes, but they probably spend half their time sifting through title after title like this thread.

I’m all for additions to DCS... but I also don’t want to saddle the devs with a laundry list of hundreds of random things to build us... this to me feels like one of those things.

Love the news(?) that the C-130 may become an official mod. I will definitely buy it. That said, I wish it weren’t the J-30. I’d rather see the standard length J (because it could easily simulate the KC-130J) or even better yet the C-130H. Would cover more timeframes.

ED, this is crucial

Look at my post in relation to what I was responding to.

Obviously, yet it still had the designation FB (fighter bomber) and eventually just F (fighter). So it’s an interesting point to make.

Just a wild guess, but it’s probably because we live in modern times.