Sealpup
-
Posts
365 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Sealpup
-
-
... I'm not clicking that.
-
5
-
-
So I removed TrackIR and am trying to go back to keyboard/mouse/joystick view control. The problem is, even with the TrackIR removed, hitting any of the view panning controls causes the view to twitch a little, but otherwise does not pan.
I have tried removing the relevant headtracker bindings in game, and I have long ago uninstalled the TrackIR software, but for whatever reason I still cannot get my view panning control back. I do recall it worked PRIOR to installing TrackIR.
EDIT: Of course, after posting that, I was able to 'fix' it by using the clear all bindings control in control options and starting from scratch. Guessing there was a binding in there, somewhere, that wasn't obvious.
-
2 hours ago, Fri13 said:
This requirement to center physical controls is little annoying here and there. I fly with extended joystick without FF or spring. I have clutch dampeners so joystick stays where I leave it.
You might be better off (and more realistic) in not using the trimmer at all in that case. Its entire purpose in life is to reduce loads on the stick so the pilot isn't constantly fighting against reversion forces in forward flight. If your stick is non-centering and holds position on its own, then you already have precisely what the trimmer would be attempting to provide.
-
1
-
-
That article sounds more like the way the old-school bombsight that the Mi-8 sometimes used works. For the Hind, you get CCIP for some of the weapons, but no CCRP capability.
-
1
-
-
47 minutes ago, Frag said:
The 80's call, they want their porn movie music back.
Alan Parsons is not porn music.
Now if you would calmly wait right there, an Inquisitor will be speaking with you shortly.
-
4
-
-
Clicked 'buy' so hard I damn near broke my finger!
-
You point the aircraft to aim the gun. Alternatively, you fire the gun to point the aircraft.
-
1
-
-
Using the SR-71's numbers to make a guess... relative altitude in meters, target speed in mach, and lock-on ranges in km in increasing angles off the nose.
-
Will the afterburner gate keybind be available for both Tomcats, or only the A's?
-
Huh. I know the Shturm is SACLOS, but I thought the 9M120 was a radar beam-rider.
-
We've discussed navigation, but what about the targeting system for the Ataka's?
Any idea what the camera will look like or how it will work?
Not a camera.
Its a periscope mechanically connected to a CW radar emitter.
-
LOAL had been in service in RL. it’s comfirmed by SMEs.
but implement it in DCS need many hard work, both ED and Deka, I can not be sure it will come or not.
That whole 'missile API' brick wall that Heatblur is currently bloodying their head against.
-
Video shows two mounted, with empty mounts for more.
-
Thank you for your effort guys.
Jester LANTIRN takes more time than expected ?
Just asking cause I'd love to laser bomb when I play alone on multiplayer servers :robot:
Take care, fly safe
I'll take a SWAG and say that the problem is non-entity targets (buildings, bridges, etc.). Getting Jester to find entities is likely easier as they can cheat a little if absolutely needed.
-
Also do not forget the Projectile and Cartridge in the comparison.
MI-24P has a 30 x 165 mm round, heavier projectile, more propellant.
AH-64 has a 30 x 113 mm round.
Much higher velocity as well. I tried looking into this a while ago, and what I found suggests that the Gsh-30-2 has similar ballistics to the A-10's complimentary can-opener.
-
If we are still getting a Persian Cat, will the A+/B still only be in Imperial colors, and will the A still have an option of using the possibly apocryphal loadouts floating around?
-
Thread reopened
The Current A-10c will still be supported, all content remains.
A-10C II Is a separate product and an optional upgrade, you do not have to purchase it. You still have your original A-10C and the free cockpit upgrade which we recently did for this 10-year-old module.
Some of you only think the worst of us and I am disappointed, why would we bother giving a 10 year old module a free cockpit upgrade if we were not going to support it?
Please keep the feedback mature and civil save the conspiracies for reddit.
thanks
The bolded bits are key here: 10 years.
Any other software package that isn't annual shovel-ware (Looking in your general direction, EA) would of been through at least three paid updates in that time frame. Just something to keep in perspective.
-
I think "medicated jester" has a better ring to it than "boring jester"
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
More so since it opens up 'Jester is off his meds!' jokes.
-
Yep...just adjust speed and altitude to bring that pipper out in front
Or use the TCS as a bomb-sight ^.^
-
I doubt the Iranians ever used NAVAIR pubs in the first place. The entire sales program was administered and coordinated through and via the USAF. It may have been Navy pilots doing some of the transit flights, but they were doing it under USAF funding.
Just because a piece of equipment went through the USAF, doesn't mean they had USAF tech orders. When I was in, the shops I was in (MetNav/Airfield Systems) had publications from the FAA, NOAA/NWS, Army, and a few other sources. So even if the USAF was dealing with the sale to Iran, they were likely still using the NAVAIR's, just with a stamp on them that added a USAF T.O. number.
-
Just so it's clear for anyone coming by in a random search, Heatblur has it's own unique AIM-7 it uses for the F-14 but they require the missile code from ED. The Heatblur AIM-7 was on par with ED's AIM-7 in the first part of 2019, then ED made some kind of change and it affected the Heatblur AIM-7. Heatblur took several months to obtain the new code. While using the old code it negatively affected their missile, dropping performance down to a 10% success rate in very easy conditions. ED eventually provided the new code to Heatblur and Heatblur patched their AIM-7 to be back on par with ED's AIM-7 in fall of 2019.
Now, if ED's AIM-7 is sluggish in general, that is a different and additional issue with ED's missile logic/code/math (whatever) and that will affect other missiles like Heatblur's AIM-7.
I'm not disputing you, just trying to keep things clear. Hopefully. Maybe. Lol.
To be even more clear, the only difference between the Tomcat's AIM-7's and the normal ED AIM-7's is that the Tomcat's are rotated 45 degrees due to using a different attaching method. In all other regards they are supposed to be identical.
-
So, with the announcement that the new free map in DCS is going to be a whole lot of island hopping and a whole lot of water, I felt this would be a relevant request to make.
Could we please get the ability to tell Jester to switch the MLC filter state?
-
I'll take a Tornado or an Aardvark, with a preference for the 'vark because I'm a yank!
-
Then what radar mode are we in to allow multiple Phoenix's fired at multiple targets?
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
The default manually steered TWS mode.
missile counter measures
in DCS: Mi-24P Hind
Posted
They've said it wont be, as it only effects a very narrow selection of threats (pretty much only Strela and Redeye). That and, in the timeframe our bird represents, they'd already been removed or deactivated.