diego999
最新回复 发布由 diego999
-
-
16 hours ago, LucShep said:
I don't agree with everything that Techspot (Hardware Unboxed website) posts or opiniates, but I tend to agree with their recent analysis, regarding the GPU market as of right now:
https://www.techspot.com/bestof/gpu-25-26/
I'd say that, regardless of "money no object", it's also important to have "notion of priorities and needs" and "common sense".
And in that matter (of common sense) the Nvidia RTX 5090 32GB is everything but - it's a nonsense halo product for a select few (like buying a Ferrari if you're a car enthusiast), with a horrible price tag even if considering the high performance and big VRAM.
And, no less important, the possible reliability issues with the very controversial 12V-2x6 power cable/plug.
The AMD RX 9070XT 16GB is currently the "best purchase" overall, considering the current market.
It's a good choice if gaming on a 1440P or 4K resolution screen.
The downside with it - or any AMD GPU for that matter - is that if you're considering going VR later it won't be the best choice.
The Nvidia RTX 5070Ti 16GB and RTX 5080 16GB are better choices for DCS and especially for VR (but at higher prices), so could be better purchases in the long run.
Regarding the VRAM - a GPU with 16GB VRAM is enough for DCS in general but, depending on module+map combo (if in MP) and if in VR or 4K screen at high/max settings, that limit can indeed be hit.
Unfortunately, the Nvidia RTX 4090 24GB is no longer produced and sold. That one is, pretty much, the "perfect" DCS high-end GPU - ironically so, as it was once so criticized but later became "the last great Nvidia release".
I'd say to not wait for the Nvidia RTX 60 series, as they won't be out before 2017.
Likewise, and for those waiting for the rumoured Nvidia RTX 50 SUPER series (refresh of the current line up) with higher VRAM, also notice that these are now in the back burner - postponed, if not canceled - due to the ongoing memory price hike.
Treat yourself with a GPU right now, as prices are expected to increase and stock to decrease (again) in coming weeks for an unknown period.
BTW, if that system is aimed for gaming, and not productivity, for the CPU I'd seriously consider the AMD 9800X3D instead of the AMD 7950X3D.
These are good suggestions.
-
Hola. Copiando la carpeta principal de DCS al otro disco y ejecutando el juego desde ese nuevo disco debería funcionar perfecto.
La configuración/misiones/mods/etc se guardan en C:\Users\*tu usuario*\Saved Games\DCS.
-
23 minutes ago, rfxcasey said:
Can't say, I haven't tried Iraq or Afghanistan yet, do you own them? I thought Persian Gulf ran pretty good, I don't really notice much difference to be honest.
No, I own Sinai and Persian Gulf. PG is a nice map but it doesn't have the variety Siria has. And Sinai, well I bought day one and it was half baked for more than a year. Now it's in a decent state, but I won't be buying OnReTech maps anymore.
Iraq of Afghanistan maybe down the line when they're in a better shape. There is considerable map fatigue in any case.
-
1
-
-
It's way better than the other desert maps, and it runs very well.
-
2
-
-
The Phantom. But because it's also my favorite plane, so not an impartial opinion
-
2
-
-
Yes please.
AI planes spending 10 minutes to take off because they want to taxi to the runway on the opposite side of the base for some reason.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, LucShep said:
I'm not going to skim through two pages of posts, most of it filled with misunderstood back and forth posts.
What I'll say is this: We're witnessing something important here - potentially a new branch in PC gaming. This will have repercussions.
What Valve is showing isn’t a cheap solution for simmers or hardcore users. It’s a way to democratize PC gaming for the mainstream: people who lack the money or time to learn, build and maintain a gaming PC, but still want full guaranteed compatibility and proper support. Valve did all the research; they have the money and the means.
Most of us here aren’t the target audience. This is aimed at laymen who just want to get into PC gaming, buy games on Steam and play them, whether alone or with others, without worrying about hardware, drivers, BIOS tweaks and updates, OS, conflicts, or troubleshooting. Some of them will eventually grow into enthusiasts later.
If the rumored price for the Steam Machine ($800 to $1000) is accurate, it’ll be hard to match the same hardware, pre-built, fully tuned, ready-to-go, and backed by 24/7 support.
And pairing that with a highly optimized Linux-based OS (SteamOS) makes this not only competition for consoles, but a direct challenge to Windows.I can already imagine more advanced users installing Linux distros on it (like Bazzite, Nobara, Pop!_OS, etc), running far lighter than Windows ever would, turning the machine into a lightweight, fully capable daily-use PC that still games well.
Meanwhile, SteamOS improvements (drivers, kernel, Vulkan), thanks to the involvement of major players like AMD, Nvidia, and Valve, will spill over into the wider Linux ecosystem, benefiting everyone.At a time when PC hardware and game development feel stale, overpriced, and overly complex - consoles aren’t doing great either - and when younger generations love tech but hate technicalities, this fits perfectly.
This might end up being even more important than many already expect.The biggest impact won’t be the hardware itself - it will be:
1. The normalization of pre-built Linux gaming PCs.
This alone forces Microsoft to react, and also pushes OEMs to start taking Linux seriously.2. The massive refinement SteamOS will bring to Linux gaming.
And as mentioned, all other distros benefit from that work - drivers, kernel, Vulkan, etc.3. The existence of official support + console-like stability in a PC form factor.
This directly addresses the exact problem that the average user doesn’t want to deal with.4. A “Steam Deck ×100” effect.
The Deck already shook the industry. A full Steam Machine will do it even more.Spot on. This is what I thought when I heard the news.
Cheap PC gaming with full Steam support and all the console advantages.
Looks promising but it all depends on the price.
-
3
-
-
Welcome southern hemisphere fellow!
-
3
-
-
I'm more interested in the VR headset. The Steam Machine is already well below of what most of us have.
-
3
-
-
17 hours ago, Phantom11 said:
Can you share the template?
Sure.
I've included hidden cows marking important places where battles and other events took place during the war.
-
3
-
-
Just block him. He's just trolling at this point, ruining a meaningful debate.
-
2
-
-
For me Caucasus is a not too bad substitute. The main problem is the size: Vietnam is more than twice bigger than the usable terrain on Caucasus.
-
3
-
-
Not worth it in my opinion but you can safely test to see if it makes any difference for you.
-
Have some confidence. Aerges is not Razbam. They have provided in the past, they will provide again.
-
3
-
-
Adding to the advice above, which I agree with (Intel for gaming makes absolutely no sense right now) I'd say a PD of 1.5 is way too optimistic and well into placebo land. In my experience, and others of this forum, when going above 1.2 or 1.3 you rapidly start to see diminishing returns. Your mileage may vary.
And absolutely, get 64GB of RAM.
-
1
-
-
Have you tried the OV-10 Bronco mod? It's fantastic.
-
1
-
1
-
-
That is caused by DLAA, and DLSS only makes it worse.
You can "fix" it by using other anti aliasing method, like TAA or MSAA.
-
Nice. Glad to have helped.
-
6 hours ago, JG7_X-Man said:
@diego999 Dude! Thank you so much for helping me figure this out - Here is my mission so I am 90% sure it's human error! Can you help me figure it out?
Your mission seems to have two problems:
- Too much speed. The AI logic somewhere decides it doesn't have enough fuel for what you're asking so it aborts the mission and lands on the nearest base available. Reducing speed to a more comfortable .76 Mach seems to make the AI happier.
- Initial attack point too far from the target. Even when you check the "visible" option, so the TU-22M is technically seeing the carrier, somehow it decides it's too far to engage. It's very frustrating because there's no feedback from the AI, so you don't know why it's not doing what you want it to do. Just trial and error.
I just set a lower speed for the TU-22M and put waypoint 3 around 50miles from the target.
Test how it goes.
-
1
-
-
10 hours ago, JG7_X-Man said:
@diego999 It worked - so after more testing it seems the issue is the Kola map. DCS has got the last 0.01 USD from me! Creating new stuff without finished the old stuff. FAIL!
Everything seems to be working fine on my end.
-
1
-
-
I answered in the other thread you made:
Please don't make duplicate threads.
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, _JMax said:
I am having trouble with this. I am pretty sure its just my file path errors,but wondering if anyone has the english cockpit mod working.Thanks.
There you can see the route. You have to copy the mod on the Saved Games folder, not on the mail install. Your folders will have other names of course but the important part is Saved Games\DCS folder (whatever its name is)\Liveries.
That folder pointed by the arrow is named "default" when you download the mod. Just change it to "english" and it should appear on the droplist inside the game to select the custom cockpit.
You have to do the same for each F1 variant (CE, EE, BE).
-
1 hour ago, jef32 said:
Since I've opened this thread, I think that even with the hardware I have, I'd been too greedy. I've switched my Meta Quest III from 90Hz refresh rate to 72Hz and the pixels x 1.4 to 1.3 in 4864 X 2592 and it's obviously better now. I think that the issue was a VRAM problem.
Have you tried reducing the FoV a bit? It depends on the general shape of your face but you probably can cut it down to 90% or a bit more without noticing the difference. That's a good chunk of pixels you can save.
New rig - RTX5090 or AMD 9070?
在 PC Hardware and Related Software
发布于
That is undervolting done wrong. The idea is to slightly limit the power so it runs cooler without a noticeable effect on performance.
I don't own one of those monster cards, but my 4070ti Super goes 8-10C° and around 50W below with undervolting. And I can't tell the difference unless I look at a benchmark.
There is absolutely no point in purchasing a 5090 only to take out ten percent of its performance.