Jump to content

diego999

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    583

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by diego999

  1. diego999
    I have a Quest 3. You are absolutely on point with the sensation. The stock facial interface is terrible. An alternative one is almost mandatory should you get a Quest headset. About Meta, I don't care but I understand other people's concern. The headset itself is very good. Clarity from edge to edge of the lenses is the main selling point, at a reasonable price. Shame it's made by a shady company. The Quest 3S is a Frankenstein made with Quest 2 leftovers. And it has the same fresnel lenses. Do not buy.
  2. diego999
    It will work but I don't think it's worth it to buy a new headset with fresnel lenses in 2025. I'd look for other options.
  3. diego999
    Hola. Todas esas opciones son plataformas "muertas" con pocas opciones de actualización para más adelante. Si se puede conseguir a buen precio en tu país una placa base con chipset B650 y un procesador Ryzen 7600, esa plataforma te da la opción de cambiar la CPU por una nueva que aparezca en 2, 3 o 4 años. Es una inversión a futuro, porque vas a tener que comprar memoria DDR5 que es mucho más cara por ahora. Todo depende del precio al que puedas conseguir los componentes, y eso varía mucho de país en país. Es un tema complejo. Si hay que elegir de esa lista, yo me quedaría con el Ryzen 5800X
  4. diego999
    I had a 3060ti until a week ago. You can play fine, accepting there's going to be compromises. Have you tried reducing your FoV? You can cut a good chunk of the total pixel count. It depends of the facial interface, how close your eyes are to the lenses, and the general shape of your face. In my case, I can't even see the difference with 0.85 or higher, so that's a nice boost right there. Start by lowering in 0.05 increments. So, 0.95, 0.90, .0.85, 0.80 until you start to see the black box. When you get to that point, it's too much, go back one step. You can do that with Oculus Tray Tool or Oculus Debug Tool. QVFR should be a good option too if your cpu can take the hit.
  5. diego999
    Single thread.exe doesn't exist anymore. The .exe in the "normal" bin folder is multithread too and it's only there for legacy purposes.
  6. diego999
    My Windows is in spanish but you get the idea.
  7. diego999
    Absolutely. DCS is ruining performance and choking VRAM with overkill textures we can't even tell apart from another half its size. It's nonsense really.
  8. diego999
    You might want to get out of the Public Test Channel if you want stability. Just saying.
  9. diego999
    Thank you! I will try your script tonight.
  10. diego999
    Those are early access/dev drivers I won't touch with a ten foot pole. Glad it's working for you. I'll try once the version is properly released.
  11. diego999
    Installed Win 11 last week. Aside from the new UI I don't like, it's exactly the same for me. Tried the exact same mission looking at the frametimes in different situations. No difference.
  12. diego999
    In my case with the J preset the cockpit is much crispier and sharper, with a slight increase in GPU frametimes. Distant objects are noticeable less blurry than before. Ghosting, on the other hand, is horrible. Way worse than all other presets. My GPU is an old 3060ti, so maybe this new preset is aimed at newer cards? I don't know.
  13. diego999
    Tried an elite strap and the sensation was amazing, but I could not tolerate the pressure in my head after 30 minutes or so. I had to return to the halo against my will.
  14. diego999
    Good decision. Don't rush with the facial interfase thing. Try the stock one for some days and maybe you'll get used to it. For me it's workable, not amazing, but decent. The stock strap, on the other hand, is garbage. It's always giving you the sensation of being about to fall off your face. There you have multiple good priced options.
  15. diego999
    Good luck. I hope you get the Pimax lottery and receive a good headset. There are horror stories on this very forum.
  16. diego999
    Setting the resolution to the max in the Meta App and a bit of increase in pixel density should give you good clarity (your 4090 should be able to go to PD 1.5, 1.6 or even more). Then you can play a bit with the encoding bitrate for fine tuning (max value is 960 but my pc can't handle more than 720). If I can read HUDs, cockpits and gauges with a 3060ti, you should be able to achieve amazing visual quality with your monster rig. You just need a bit of patience to find the right settings.
  17. diego999
    You are correct. No. Far from that. Don't buy any of the official Meta accesories. Look for third party ones. I've been using a $15 generic USB-C cable for the last two years, zero problems. For alternative head straps there are decent ones that will not add much to the total cost. And the face gasket, for me, it's perfectly serviceable. Your mileage may vary.
  18. diego999
    For me it was the opposite. Link offers the best quality, with VD as a close second but just not the same. Airlink is noticeable worse than the other two.
  19. diego999
    This. The MiG-19 is not a serious offender. It might be a little too good compared to the real thing but it's manageable. 15 and 21 are out of this world, and I would add the F-5 too. Another serious issue with AI planes is their perfect control at near stall speeds. Try this with the Mirage F1, for example. It can keep its nose pointed at will at 200kts, while you flying the plane in the same situation would drop like a brick.
  20. diego999
    So you're dropping your realism standards only to make a module that will be completely out of place in DCS, as every red asset it's going against is 20+ years older. If you can pull data out of your posterior to make the F-35, you can surely do the same with the Su-57, F-22, Su-30SM, J-20 and others. Right?
  21. diego999
    I hope so. Abusing redfor planes 3 decades older is going to get boring fast.
  22. diego999
    Even if it works, I don't think your GPU hallucinating most of the frames will make for a pleasant experience in VR.
  23. diego999
    Better ask again when the 5090 is eventually released and benchmarks appear. It can be fantastic, a failure or just meh. Nobody knows for now.
  24. diego999
    Maybe in 40 years when all the tech it uses is no longer classified.
  25. diego999
    No hot swap between 2D and VR. No ability to reconnect the headset. No saving during mission feature. DCS is seriously lacking in this regard.
×
×
  • Create New...