Jump to content

BigBorner

Members
  • Posts

    254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS World, Il2
  • Location
    Görmany

Recent Profile Visitors

992 profile views
  1. No, i wanted to say that although the pilot might have told the truth, that does not necessarily mean that taking away that capability from the WMD7 might have been an error. I dont know what the Aselpod is capable to do, but considering Pakistan and, i think, nigeria switching to them, there might be a reason.
  2. afaik not every country uses the pod we have in dcs, pakistan for example replaced them with a turkish aselpod
  3. Are we talking about rocket (-pods) or missiles now?
  4. How should that work? Rockets are fired from a Pod using their own Engine power.
  5. We dont have the Block 3 in DCS. We have Pakistani Block 1. I was just mentioning things that were, at some point, slated to be added or said to be added but conditions apply, like the HMD.
  6. And i wouldnt want to miss the dual LD-10 Pylons either.
  7. I have checked you track, for me the LD-10 did not self destruct. First one lofted and almost got to the target before the track ended, other ones ran out of energy and were about to do a belly landing when the track ends.
  8. I’ve used the LD-10 successfully several times since the last patch. This sounds really weird. You got a track of it happening?
  9. Focus on the Radar + TEWS. Put it on 80 Miles display, put the TDC on 40nm, Scan alternating from 0-20k feet and 18-whatever it was feet. Hope that this giant dish does something for you.
  10. - Some fixes to be made to TGP and some A/G Weapons. - They promised a Cruise / Performance / Range Page before it gets out of "Early Access" - HMD if Pakistan adds it to their Block 1 Jeffs. Other than that, its feature complete.
  11. Of course there would be something to contribute for it. Like - an answer to the request if the promised feature will happen or not. And when. That’s the main issue here. No meaningful communication at all.
  12. why not finish the first module if the team is so small and there arent enough ressources for 2 modules? jeff is one of the most expensive modules without to much participation in sales. why is "youll figure it out. gl hf" an acceptable approach to a manual / module? F_16 and 18, F15 and apache, too are actively worked on. jeff just isnt. 2 years since the last addition of anything except liveries. so its either finished or abandoned except minor lua changes (and only if the cummunity delivers the solution. and even then noone bothers to check if the same fix is needed somewhere else). but well never know, because there is absolutely no community engagement except random comments without any info what to expect. yeah, its nice that uboats wants to check issues now, that persist since the initial spi logic "update". PL12 is just a lua hack to test SD10 with amraam scheme. nothing more. they are doing nothing on any weapons. just waiting until they get all under EDs umbrella. thats it.
  13. Why do you shift your focus to a new module if the "old" one is not finished? Especially if you tell people that the Module is considered "stable" by the devs? FPAS Page is also missing. TPOD, SPI and AG Radar logic is broken. There is no english manual from Deka, without chuck and web translations the Jeff wouldnt be usable for non-chinese speakers. The last time something added to the "early access" jeff was almost 2 years ago some new weapons. And if you ask if promised features are still planned at all - you dont even get an answer. Honestly - how should one defend that? Its not okay.
  14. Why did they stop working on it except some bugfixing here and there? They consider the Jeff "stable". Means for me: Not EA anymore.
  15. I dont think this will happen. Jeff is out of Early Access and no FPAS / Cruise Page.
×
×
  • Create New...