Jump to content

Scoggs

Members
  • Posts

    403
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Scoggs

  1. OIC, sorry. I don't know much about F-15's in general, so I would be surprised if I didn't make a mistake.
  2. According to the NATOPS A1-F18AC-NFM-000, it's 10,800Lbs internal A through C.
  3. Internal capacity of the C is about 11,900lbs. Internal capacity of the E is 14,400lbs and the F is in the 13,100 range IIRC. Usually the E/F's will fly with one 480 gallon drop tank adding another 3,264lbs. of fuel. Increasing total fuel to 17,664lbs. The F-15E carries (Internally) 13,700lbs or so. Although apparently they usually fly with Conformal Fuel Tanks so that ups the fuel to 22,630lbs. These numbers are with JP-5
  4. Well the thing about hype is that people start building things in their head that they think will be in the game only to be pissed off in the end. HAHAHA!!! While I really want a Hornet, if its not a Rhino then I couldn't care less. TBH I mainly want something fast.
  5. I usually use the TGP in AG mode and FLIR so I can see the diamond. I just point the A/C towards the TACAN marker and slew the TGP around until I see it. Sorry, I was just suggesting, I didn't mean to come off as pushy or anything. Not sure where you are located, but it goes for about $30-$50 in the US. Yeah that is really annoying. Although I'm glad it's not just me :D
  6. My $70 T.Flight X from Thrustmaster does it perfectly. Well I paid $70 for it 4 years ago, I'm sure it's a lot cheaper now.
  7. Add in 1000 player multiplayer and that's my idea of a perfect game.
  8. Do you honestly think that they would be allowed to release the exact software the military uses?
  9. Scoggs

    Game Engines!

    you should read above lol.
  10. I wouldn't base the f-35 that's out for FSX with the Rhino that is. The VRS Rhino is based off of the NATOPS flight manual and Flight data. Pretty much the same stuff DCS would use to make their model off of. Especially since any currently in use fighter aircraft will have classified information. Regardless of how old it is, oh and that is including the A-10C we have.
  11. That would be really cool! I would definitely enjoy playing with real guys on the ground. However I agree with Speed that I wouldn't want to be confined to a small area as it is in arma 2 and 3. But that's not to say that the maps will always be small like that. Especially since Arma is a PC Only title. In the next say 5 years they might be able to have an environment as large as our AO. EDIT: I voted yes btw
  12. Scoggs

    Game Engines!

    well it's not like they are making a game out of the engine. I believe that they are showing what's possible, more like a tech demo per se.
  13. Scoggs

    Game Engines!

    Oh My mistake. I was talking about what the guy did (i.e. the guy i started the thread about) As for the unlimited detail engine. Most likely fake and if it is real its at least 5 years away. Edit; According to Notch(Creator of Minecraft) the unlimited detail engine is a scam. http://notch.tumblr.com/post/8386977075/its-a-scam
  14. Scoggs

    Game Engines!

    there... haven't tried them myself, mainly for lack of time.
  15. Scoggs

    Game Engines!

    except for the downloadable working demos...
  16. Scoggs

    Game Engines!

    Hire this guy!!! His work looks amazing, having all these things put into DCS would be amazing! http://evasion.inrialpes.fr/~Eric.Bruneton/
  17. That would be nice, also official support for virtual threads too
  18. Well in that case it could even be the E or F cause VRS holds those domain names.
×
×
  • Create New...