Fitzcarraldo
最新回复 发布由 Fitzcarraldo
-
-
11 hours ago, waterman said:
I have been using Cfrag`s "DML" "CivAir" for Years !
It is fantastic and i have a similar setup i use for running random timetable DCS Trains if ever the Broken Deactivation gets fixed !
I cant believe you people dont know about CivAir !
I think for "basic functionality" it's better to have robust systems built directly into the game.
-
2
-
1
-
-
+1
ED, Give us all the combinations, especially if the models are already in the files...
Grey kits on regular bodies simply look cool and coated bodies (navy) with older green kits are needed for historic naval aviation.-
1
-
-
-
+1
-
1
-
-
Ja bitte!
-
8 minutes ago, Rudel_chw said:
Oh. Great. Thanks for the answer!
I think now we need more sub-categories in the editor to better filter for all the different structures... -
Yes "RWR force off", would be good even for modern jets, because AI has way too good situational awareness through RWR alone.
-
2
-
-
At 0:16 sec there are camouflage nettings seen in the video. Are those "tent" objects new? WIP? Already in the sim somewhere?
-
On 5/12/2025 at 9:35 AM, draconus said:
It's not that easy. Some options can affect both CPU and GPU, some also affect RAM/VRAM and their performance hit depends on the hardware from not affecting at all to significant hit. Some hints already include that info.
This is true. I think there should be better documentation though. Last time i checked it didn't tell you that flat shadows are CPU drawn for example. Also better documentation on things like preload radius...
There's a lot of misinformation floating around because without documentation people are susceptible to placebo effects when setting those things.-
3
-
-
+1
ED needs to figure out how to master their textures better. I play on 1080p but still need to run textures at max, because everything lower is extremely inconsistent visually.
We need medium (and low) texture settings that look decent instead of the current mixed bag...-
3
-
-
Is the development of new infantry (i assume with new animation system) tied to (missing) crew of (for example) AAA guns?
I hope that a new system for Infantry would make it easier to put visible crew in vehicles, guns and emplacements... -
On 1/19/2025 at 10:43 AM, twistking said:
Revisiting this every few years to cross out items. Unfortunately only little to cross out this time...
At least ATC and DTC are confirmed to be in active development...well... technically the DTC function is released already.
-
1
-
-
-
9 hours ago, DmitriKozlowsky said:
A-10CII, F-16C, F-14B, AH-64D, OH-58,F/A-18C, anything with NS430.
-
Are there aircraft that would support it?
-
+1
Just being able to limit max thrust by a set percent would be useful
-
1
-
-
I think runway visibility is generally decent, but there should be mission editor control to force lights on or off.
-
2
-
-
-
-
Ich finde ja, dass die A-7 das "zweitbeste" Flugzeug überhaupt ist (Nach der A-6 natürlich) und bin auch sehr gespannt auf das DCS Modul.
Bin nur etwas skeptisch was den Entwickler angeht. Hat einer schon Module von denen geflogen (in anderen Sims) und kann was zur Qualität sagen? Bei der MS Sim gibt es ja Module im Shop die echt richtig schlecht sind und erstmal keine Qualifikation für ein DCS Module darstellen sollten... -
I've read about the 104 having an IR sensor. Is it comparable to what we now would call IRST. Did it work well?
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Bucic said:
Ah. Any technical or employment differences worth noting?
Well, if you drop them one by one, they'll flip the damn plane.
-
2
-
-
On 2/7/2025 at 11:08 PM, nairb121 said:
Back to the original topic - the following passage is from the -1 manual concerning handling characteristics with asymmetrical wing stores:
It's interesting to note that the -1 actually only allows GBU-16 on the centerline pylon, not on the wings - presumably ED made the (reasonable) assumption that, since the inboard pylons were approved for Mk-83, the GBU-16 would also be usable. (Unless there's an additional source that I'm not aware of, which is very possible). I wonder if the issues you're observing are the reason the USAF -1 manual didn't allow them?
That's very plausible. Dual GBU-16 single drop is fun and interesting in the sim, but if someone's life depended on it, i'd always go for a different loadout. Enough options with GBU-10 and 12...
-
8 minutes ago, Minsky said:
You're overthinking it:
I don't think the trees were the performance hog people think they were. I only struggled over Guam proper. I suspect the general scene complexity there is the culprit.
Caucasus runs super fast and it also has a lot of trees (but not much more)...-
2
-
1
-
2026 and Beyond Speculation (and Wishlist) Thread
在 DCS 2.9
发布于
I hope for a recreation of the following photo and generally some love for the F-5E..