Jump to content

Speacy

Members
  • Posts

    90
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Speacy

  1. Yes its fact since 2.8, for FLIR like many other things, my squadron rolling back to the stable version, please ED.... solve this horrible 2.8 patch BEFORE deploy on stable version
  2. Since last patch (2.8) ground units doesn't restart waypoint sequence when we trigger to back at origin point. previous loop method between 2 WP or more are now dysfunctional. Why change editor logic ? Why every time you make a patch you brake many features, since many years its same... Dont tell me its beta, DCS is eternal beta, your stable version is also a beta version, just with other problems cycle. Because your ratio is: 1 bug sold 1 bug created test2.miz
  3. The goal il to bring jet as real as is get, not a tailored module. AF is not on axis on real plane, flight model need to be same as NATOPS perf charts, payload limits are real, i think you can't take 2 HARM at same pylon (but i need to check to make sure). Edit: No you can't
  4. I'm less optimistic since some years, sure enough the black shark and A-10C was great and still great now (even if the DCS core is more stable now than 10 years ago), but i'm more worried by trade policy than other things like technical issues.
  5. Maybe a little bit more hindsight making us worried by the possibility it'll never be fully featured… Can you understand this point of view even if you don't share the same?
  6. And many others share his opinion, also silent people playing since long time on DCS communities. I think he don't speak for "you" but for many customers who never come here. I think also ED will lost many customers for their early access model, simply from others communities feedbacks.
  7. Yes, there is a mod for that but we dont use mods, we are also waiting for this feature, for finally doing CAS with hornet without human JTAC need
  8. Yes buying at early access stage is investing, or what is it, donation? I think no, invest is based on promises, and i don't think the actual state worth the 80$ i've paid. And yes i regret, even you're right, it's not more important than life itself, really not lol … But more people disapointed = less sales at next early access module. I just react to Nineline when he said we have to be grateful , its false, its business, not charity
  9. I totaly agree, and please stop thinking every point of view shared here is isolated. Lot of customers know money they have invested for F-18 early access was used for F16 early access launch, like they know UH-1 story (with belsimtek team now working for you) and others modules released without announced features, like the Early-access quantity at same time dont cease to grow, year after year (what the next? When?... If you don't change your mind soon i suppose) No we don't have to be grateful, we paid for what you sell, its good thing only if you delivers what we paid for. What have you really done since A-10 ? (and not for us… but mainly to satisfy air national guard). Don't tell to trust you, just prove we can
  10. Good idea for investing, and i confirm, i'll never buy another unfinished product! Ed has ruined my vision of early access concept or any financial support for "future" project, including any other markets. And we're many people like that (and growing more and more). Some years ago i've warned to long term impact of lack of honesty and transparency, answer was lifetime warning or others punctual punishment. Im glad to see its better now, you're more open for discussion, and now i think you can see was right by past. @wags: please just keep in mind we will all lose if ED sink, you for market credibility and us for losing use of high potential simulation software, but high potential doesn't mean customers will accept everything, you can control communication here but not on others communities, sharing many things about DCS, you know its limited market, its good to work at growing harcore sim community but not to the detriment of older customers because renewal is not sufficient… Its just suggestion, not a rude report, i don't blame you for my F-18 early purchase, i was wrong and its my error, but was last time, you will lose more customers if you dont change direction Have a good day sir.
  11. i understand, thank you for answer :thumbup:
  12. Interresting, are you really willing to refund us or it's just for moving subject?
  13. Especially as it's not 1st time, was same past year, you divide your workforce on too many projects at same time. And there is no doubt money is the problem origin and purpose. Yes there is covid, yes we understand it's a good reason for objectives delays, the problem is it's same on normal time, too many new products with beautiful pre release trailers and once released on early access its "full brake" and push another product with same process. It's not correct for customers. No communication can erase that, its fact, if your business model is like that well, but please, be honest and admit it. At least we know what we're buying and cannot complain. It this case off course i would not have bought F-18C as far was finished but that even clear and honest.
  14. Out of early access = start of beta ??? Final release expected 2022? ...
  15. For me you're the best 3rd party dev, after well mades viggen and F-14, continue like that, there is no doubt the F14 is my next module purchase, i too would like retry it since last free days past month. But i agree , if i want it i must pay it, viggen is already in my library and i love it too.
  16. You seem to have summed up the situation perfectly, thanks
  17. 2.5.5 work fine with VR, we don't need graphics update, please roll back graphic engine before deploy the patch on stable and work on planes development. I invested 1500€ for VR ready specs computer with VR device, you cant tell decrease graphics for gain FPS!! For same graphic quality i want same FPS than 2.5.5. It's not correct to modify the game specs at every patch
  18. L'équipe de la 355th VFW est heureuse de vous annoncer sa réouverture apres 2 ans s'absence, nous remercions au passage la 3rd wing de nous avoir accueilli pendant ce laps de temps et serions ravis de preserver une amitié durable avec eux. La 355th est une petite communauté DCS initialement fondée en 2012, de retour, réunie autour d'une doctrine qui fait office de charte commune, le seul critère d'intégration quelque soit le projet est d'etre en accord avec celle ci, en dehors de ce critère nous sommes ouvert a tous profils, que vous soyez a la recherche d'une structure pour monter votre escadron ou si vous souhaitez rejoindre un escadron déjà en place (a ce jour seul le VMFA-251, sur F/A-18C, est opérationnel). Le site propose déjà aux membres la possibilité de créer de la documentation, d'intégrer ses missions au sein de notre base de donnée, un accès a un serveur ftp et l'utilisation du forum et du Discord pour faciliter les échanges. Certaines fonctionnalités comme l'affichage des statistiques et heures de vol des pilotes sont en cours de développement mais sont déjà stockée par notre outil de gestion des vols. Pour plus d'informations n'hésitez pas a prendre contact avec nous, y compris pour faire un ou plusieurs vols a nos cotés (des fois le plus important est l'aspect relationnel, il est tout a fait normal de vouloir se forger une opinion la plus complete possible avant de prendre une decision). Je précise également que la 355th n'a pas vocation a devenir une grande communauté, mais en priorité un groupe soudé lors des vols, le but étant de développer la cohésion de groupe et la solidarité en mission avant les individualités. Nous ne sommes pas élitistes, nous souhaitons progresser ensemble, chacun a son rythme, mais le maitre mot reste la progression, en tirant partit des erreurs commises en mission grace aux debriefings ainsi que des points forts de chacun qui peuvent etre different selon les personnes. Nous nous efforçons également de conduire les vols de manière la plus réaliste possible, établissant les procedures le plus fidèlement possible en se référant aux NATOPS et autres documents officiels a notre disposition. Adresse du site: http://355th.fr Chaine YouTube
  19. And i have also a big surprise, that money come from customers, we don't paid for words but for products. everyone is free to give money for nothing but its not my case. I've spent lot of money to ED company since black shark 1 (10 years...). buying Early access and betas for help to fund projects, hornet was the last for me and i'm not alone, many simmers dont talk here but thinks same. ED team say they are working hard on Hornet and i see they are working hard only to release Viper's early access. Well it's their choice, the futur will tell whether was a good idea or not.
  20. Happened with drivers up to date, i have same problem on viggen campaign mission 5 2019-07-13 19:11:25.144 INFO TACVIEW.DLL: End of flight data recording 2019-07-13 19:11:26.217 INFO Config: netview stopped 2019-07-13 19:11:26.236 INFO EDCORE: try to write dump information 2019-07-13 19:11:26.237 INFO EDCORE: # -------------- 20190713-191127 -------------- 2019-07-13 19:11:26.238 INFO EDCORE: DCS/2.5.5.33184 (x86_64; Windows NT 10.0.17134) 2019-07-13 19:11:26.239 INFO EDCORE: E:\DCS World\bin\edCore.dll 2019-07-13 19:11:26.240 INFO EDCORE: # C0000005 ACCESS_VIOLATION at A0778BE8 00:00000000 2019-07-13 19:11:26.242 INFO EDCORE: SymInit: Symbol-SearchPath: '.', symOptions: 534, UserName: 'speac' 2019-07-13 19:11:26.243 INFO EDCORE: OS-Version: 10.0.17134 () 0x300-0x1 2019-07-13 19:11:26.315 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000018BE8 (edCore): LinkHost::ResetLinks + 0x28 2019-07-13 19:11:26.327 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000005512 (edObjects): viMovingObject::~viMovingObject + 0x42 2019-07-13 19:11:26.328 INFO EDCORE: 0x000000000006ECE2 (WorldGeneral): woLABase::~woLABase + 0x12 2019-07-13 19:11:26.329 INFO EDCORE: 0x00000000002C5DF2 (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-07-13 19:11:26.329 INFO EDCORE: 0x000000000058FE32 (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-07-13 19:11:26.330 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000568DD8 (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-07-13 19:11:26.330 INFO EDCORE: 0x00000000005542CA (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-07-13 19:11:26.330 INFO EDCORE: 0x000000000006743A (edCore): Common::FSM::sendOutputSymbol_ + 0x4A 2019-07-13 19:11:26.330 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000067263 (edCore): Common::FSM::onSymbol_ + 0x183 2019-07-13 19:11:26.330 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000564DA3 (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-07-13 19:11:26.331 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000538234 (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-07-13 19:11:26.331 INFO EDCORE: 0x00000000001B012F (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-07-13 19:11:26.332 INFO EDCORE: 0x00000000007198F6 (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-07-13 19:11:26.334 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000014034 (KERNEL32): BaseThreadInitThunk + 0x14 2019-07-13 19:11:26.334 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000073691 (ntdll): RtlUserThreadStart + 0x21 2019-07-13 19:11:26.505 INFO EDCORE: Minidump created.
  21. Same on stable for me Edit: Maybe GPU drivers outdated, i'll check after update Edit2: It not driver's problem dcs.log-20190713-151825.zip dcs.log-20190713-191127.zip
  22. Same for me crash every time im leaving mission 5 Edit: same issue on nevada red flag campaign M1 crash Logs: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3978323&postcount=5
  23. Speacy

    SCUD Missle

    Or ground radar waves flight model
  24. No, it's same on 1.5.5 I think it's mission library corruption. I have trouble with units name in the library file of the mission, and also i have L-39C on the mission (AI only) *Sorry for my langage im french and i don't speak english very well.
  25. i know that, but i would prefered a 100% functionnal editor (the most penalising part by bugs) with initial features and, only when its done, adding new features, without deteriorate old features. But i understand your point of view... * Sorry for my english i don't speak very well
×
×
  • Create New...