Jump to content

NineLine

ED Team
  • Posts

    31221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    59

About NineLine

  • Birthday December 25

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS World (all current Modules)
  • Location
    BC, Canada
  • Interests
    Flight Sims, Game Design, Design, WWII Aircraft Research & 3D Modelling, photography.
  • Occupation
    Associate Producer

Recent Profile Visitors

48599 profile views
  1. So I was just testing this for making tracks for the devs. When I start up I see no other aircraft on the TAD. If I switch off the JTRS switch and back on, then I see airborne targets. I do not see my flight on the ground. I do see my flight once they take off. And when I land I still see everything in flight. As flights land, not my own, their marker stops tracking when that aircraft lands (is this correct?) As my flight lands, their marker stops tracking when they land (is this correct) Right now I see the bug with the JTRS switch needing to be switched off and on again to see flights in the air, but want to confirm the tracking of other flights and my own on the ground.
  2. To be fair, the A-10C was flying over the Caucasus for many years, I am not sure it has ever flown over there in real life, let alone during combat, right? So while we want to fill in the gaps in terrain and other aircraft we are not a cookie-cutter type of developer with our focus being on the simulation of the aircraft and its systems. Everything we do takes time I have not seen a module yet that someone could not have fun with in some manner or another. One day we will have Vietnam or Korea, or other Cold War/Combat Theaters but things do take time. The La-7 will be a blast, we have Luftwaffe aircraft to put up against it, if you put the I-16 in a good position against even the Bf 109 you can win, and finding that out is one of the cool things about DCS, no matter what the name of the terrain is you are over doing it.
  3. Always good to include a track. Best way to get input on what might be going on
  4. Guys, this thread is for discussion of things that were in the newsletter, there are other threads about things that were not that people were hoping were. Thanks.
  5. Does anyone have any tracks handy? Otherwise I will work on some tomorrow. Thanks. From Dev: "Datalink should work on the ground once it is turned on and timed into the network. Otherwise it is a bug indeed. Same for symbols being not visible on HMCS, but visible on TAD. I would appreciate tracks or at least missions with steps to reproduce." Thanks
  6. I know its hard, but I think as with all of HB's offerings, it will be worth the wait.
  7. Everyone at ED and HB is doing everything they can to make sure it's ready for all of you, which can take more time than planned. When we have a more solid idea of when it will come we will share for sure. I do not think it will be long now, although I know the wait is painful. We appreciate everyone's patience no matter how thin it's stretched right now. Thanks.
  8. Its less about the bombs and more about the lack of fragmentation model (in progress) and building and ground unit DM.
  9. Can you send me a link in DM to any Jira report or Internal Tester report you might have made on this and we can make sure it gets some attention? Thanks.
  10. Sorry for the delay, I have requested this now, thanks!
  11. This is already reported and fixed internally, thanks.
  12. I don't think this is an AI issue as the AI land on oil platforms just fine on their own. Perhaps its an issue with he script you are using.
×
×
  • Create New...