Маэстро

Thank you, will be fixed

Thanks, we will see what we can do

Coming soon

Thanks, we will look into this

Could you please attach a track?

1. There is no contradiction with these books. I already told that it is zero because there are no doppler filters placed to part of spectra which contain sidelobe clutter and opening targets. That's how it usually made IRL. There is no rational reason to place filters in sidelobe clutter area if radar has MPRF and INTL mode. 2. RGHPRF does have this problem, it's just less severe. MPRF still better for detection of opening targets. 3. The only practical usage of HPRF against opening targets is MC STT(PDI illumination for Sparrow). But that's different mode and has nothing to do with RWS or VS.

It's not a bug. In HPRF Pd does not depend on closure rate, but it does depend on target radial velocity (projection of target vlocity on LOS). Yes, that may look like it based just on target aspect, but it's not in fact. And yes you cannot detect any cold target in HPRF RWS because it's not designed for this. In this mode Doppler filter bank is always placed in clear spectra region, to the right of side lobe clutter + some margin(see speed gate option), so radar can see only closing targets.

Hi! Could you please attach a track? This bug definitely has been fixed, but it seems something is broken again.

Hmm, looks like a bug.

We will investigate. Looks like R-13 drag issue.

It was added to the game, but it was not added to the payload in 2.9. Sorry for that. Will be available soon.

You are welcome guys. Yes, P3 is also added. There are 3 "p" versions now: P3 and P5 with reduced smoke motor, and original P with smoky one.

In 2.9 MiG-21 original missiles were replaced with ours, so many of problems you have described should be fixed. Rb24/J and Rb74 for AJS-37 were also replaced.

Unfortunately, there were some source code conflicts which prevent including aim-9 changes into public version. All changes included into forthcoming 2.9 now. Sorry for long release.

Maybe I'm wrong about F-15, but i know some red radars that work exactly as I have described - alternate 2-3 PRFs until detection occur and then froze PRF for range measurement. Anyway it would be interesting to make some research on performance of both methods. But that was the point. To lock average power in some bounds using transmitter input power. Energy conservation law is always there. System(GTWT) can not give more energy than it receive => average output power can not exceed consumed power. Otherwise it's a violation of the law of energy conservation. I understand your considerations. But problem there is relatively high(to similar systems) average power. Taking into account low efficiency of TWTs we should expect about 20kW of input power in that case, most part of which will turn into heat(which in turn must be removed by powerful cooling system). Does not look typical. Thank you! I will study your recommendations. We also have some thoughts on resolution effects implementation, but it will require time - more realistic tracking loops for STT and TWS, and other things are needed in that case.