Jump to content

TDBONE1

Members
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. PS5 Dualsense has alot more features (the touchpad + gyros + accelerometers + more buttons (included in the triggers)) vs XS gamepads forgot to mention mic and speaker for voip too. with no ds4windows installed and using only the driver provided windows 11 i use sony firmware update tool to check if there is new controller firmware. there is none available. Windows 11 = fully updated at the time of this writing. DCW World = 2.8.8.43704 in dcs world controller settings i can see my keyboard controls and the ps5 dualsense controls. i have tried to program rudder to triggers and cant get it right. so i then installed ds4windows and have it set to x360 gamepad emulation where its similar to xbox series controller i guess. can someone for the love of "DCS World" make a specific guide only for the ps5 gamepad and yes please upload the profile. ive spent way way way too long getting this better then xs gamepad working in dcs world. this is crazy. i dont want to hear this is a sony problem and there driver. program the game to actually work with it or make an official thread saying how to get it working even if it says use ds4windows. then could someone please make a guide to program this exact specific controller using all its functionality. i know about the videos that show both an XS and DS gamepad included in the video but its basically just letting you emulate the x360 gamepad using ds4windows. this is pathetic i have to install 3rd party drivers that i have to click yes to agree to if i want to use one of the most popular controllers on the planet. i just looked at wikipedia. over 40 million units sold. now how many people bought extra controllers? there are a crap load of these out there im betting 60 million total ps5 dualsense controllers are out worldwide. xbox controllers work great while ps5 and maybe ps4 dualsense dont. i didnt even include how many ps4 dualsense controllers are out in the wild. i bet 100 million anyhow its hard to fly when all you are is stuck in the control settings also another thing to the devs. the ui for configuring the controls needs to be color coded and a picture so when you program your controller it shows you the buttons and axis working on that specific controller layout. this includes for hotas. all controllers that have a huge market share at least. i have an xbox series x system and 3 controllers. i have a single ps5 dualsense controller and it is better there is no doubt no debate so i dont want this to turn into that flame stuff. thats not what this is about. this is about if you dont have a hotas and only have a gamepad it is very very difficult to program these gamepads. especially when the axis and features it has arent available to pick from in the assignments area please please make a better controls configurator. the drop down list of controls commands is not good enough. leave all command in one area. not sort menu and just color code them or suggest where to map too on your controller would be great. the default layouts who is programming these? default layouts dont work for xs controllers or ps from what i played with. you always got to go find a youtube video and then those only show you how to make it act like an x360 this is madness. ok i guess thats a rant but for real. im not a noob to dcs and played F4 and Flanker series. this is not a good way to program controllers and should be functional and color corded keyboard chart that has area of control groups so you can hi hope someone makes a guide just for this model for the dsc world 2.8 core for su25t and p51d if someone at ED gets this working correctly for XS and PS5 gamepads so when you hit "reset" for those controls in the mapping area each controller profile should work without issue. from that point most people can fine tune their mappings but since that dont work correctly we have to manually pick stuff out from the beginning. anyhow bye before i keep going in circles.
  2. was going to try and edit the .lua file but windows 11 notepad didnt work so i went to the ms store and got some lua app under utilities and tools but it didnt work so i just capped it in the nvidia settings app. worked great and thanks. i get 120 in 4k medium and i think it was 65 or 50 in 4k high. i will make new test of it but all i do is hit fly for IA, Su25t and "target practice" since the other benchmark dont work correctly. cant wait til you make the one you said. i think its still needed by the community. its one of the first ways to tell if your system is working correctly. think the benchmark map would be valued. thanks again everyone. cant wait to get a hotas and vr. i was really worried with it only showing 50fps
  3. will check gameplay settings for wake turbulence. its default as i havent touched it. my lg 43" can do 1080@120hz or 2160p@60hz but i disable v-sync so that should tell me the fps that my computer hardware actually does (i think).
  4. thanks for quick reply. with caucasus map on 4k low it hits me hard in instant action with su-25 yes please make new track not syria as i dont have that yet. maybe a new thread too? i would def reply with my benchmarks if you did or just keep this one going is fine too but probably good idea to make a new one.
  5. i cant make it to 150secs the plane crashes into trees by houses alot less then that. i think around 130secs has the benchmark track been changed or something or maybe the game not replaying the track file correctly? from as far as i can make it (right when plane crashes i hit stop recording at about 130 seconds from when i hit the fly button these are my results. 22-06-2022, 09:00:43 DCS.exe benchmark completed, 6020 frames rendered in 82.625 s Average framerate : 72.8 FPS Minimum framerate : 61.4 FPS Maximum framerate : 83.8 FPS 1% low framerate : 61.7 FPS 0.1% low framerate : 60.1 FPS i have Windows 11 + 5600x + 16GB ram (2x8 pc 3000mhz) + slow hard drive 5400 rpm 2.5" + 3080 ti
  6. all that info is great and much appreciated. will be looking at that benchmark test by Hiob soon. i thought i didnt need a screenshot of my settings because i said i was at 4k and then i select the quality option of "Low" isnt that enough data needed or should i take an actual screenshot still?
  7. Windows 11 + 5600x + 3080 ti 12GB + 16GB ram + 5400rpm hard drive 2.5" just like the title says. 50fps right when you enter the map right after you hit "Fly" button. i use cursor keys on keyboard to goto right above the roof tops and also 50fps. no action going on what so ever. what is going on? how am i going to VR game at 4k with this specific game when it cant even do 50fps on my tv in 4k? no dlss... no fsr... are ppl with vr just setting a lower headset resolution because from my research if it cant play at 50fps with my hardware at 4k-Low than how can it play 4k in vr? any info would be great and since there is no in game benchmark tool i just picked something everyone with the game can test. its all free included maps and planes. i hope i have some setting wrong or something.
  8. about a year ago i was talking to some people about DX11 and the game engine i was told there was going to be a patch coming that added multi-core or multi-thread support. just wondering what is the status of this? btw i know about the sound having its own core. that is not what im talking about.
  9. it was in this thread that someone told me the radio messages were updated and also the cockpits. that is why i "REPEATED" what they said. after all how do you think i learned that info?
  10. i have read every post in this thread. i have not skipped one work if you arent playing that is fine. what i have been doing is trying to gather information. i just now figured you are somebody important. that is great but just the average joe talking to me is fine to. you are definately going to biased since you wrote the code. you know if there was a demo it would be alot easier for me and others to check. instead of i have to wait for reviews or come here and ask questions or watch some videos on youtube and there are not that money that show hud only. all i am trying to do is spend my money wisely. sorry for asking about the game. btw i just noticed this thread was moved to chit-chat... GREAT!!! thanks for taking it out of the DCS: A10C forum....
  11. the above poster is correct responding for me like he did. the game DCS: A10C seems very similar to lockon to me (especially in hud view.) it looks like F4 did when allied forces came out. you do know i used to play flanker. flanker to lockon was revolutionary and warranted a premium of $49.00 at the time. going from lockon to FC to FC2 to blackskark to A10C just seems like minor upgrades to me. mostly just cockpits and more radio messages. i am glad people have been explaining of the graphic options that have changed but when i look at the scenery from lockon to A10C it looks alot similar. i am sorry but that is how i see it. now i know the cockpits look ALOT better. i will say that....the MFD look sweet and i must say it just looks really polished but the clouds and terrain look just alot alike. when i look at the airfields or cities when the videos are playing it looks alot like lockon. i really think that the $60.00 price tag should be a new game and not just a modification even if it is a Total Conversion which this is not. i will wait for price drop but that is what i do for all my games. btw there was no BFBC for PC.....so i dont know what you mean. i play BFBC2 so even if it is the same engine as BFBC1 i would never know as that never was on pc. the previous BF on pc was BF2142 and then it went to BFBC2 so that was a huge difference. btw does anyone remember flanker....i loved that game alot....and i loved lockon when it came out eventhough there was a ton of problems. :)
  12. i believe i asked "please show me a video" right above this post. come on if you are going to quote me please get it right. i do appreciate you spending the time telling me things to look for while comparing lockon to A10C by DCS: i remember an app that let me adjust the tree density for lockon and also the range i think. i forget the name of the app... one sec i googling. "LOMAN" and "LOCFG" those utilities let you adjust all kinds of things. are you saying that DCS: A10C has more tree density and greater draw distance then those utilites let you have with lockon? tell me more now that you know i know about loman and locfg. i know hdr was added but what about the other things you mentioned. thanks
  13. switch to hud only view then tell me DCS: A10C looks 2x better then lockon. it looks the same to me if you are in hud only. i am trying to see what you are seeing but i keep on seeing same game engine from lockon to DCS: A10C please show me a video of both from hud only comparing the graphics. i am trying to see what you see but im just not seeing it. sure would be nice if there was a demo.
  14. ok lets leave physx out of it. i will let that one go as alot of devs dont use it as much of it can be done on newer cpus anyhow. but im not going to leave out multi-threaded support when that has been around since 2000 when quake3 came out. this is 11 years later and by not including multi-core/threaded support just shows that the original game engine (lockon) has not been messed with to much. am i correct on this? it sure does seem EVERYTHING out these days supports multi-core/multi-threads. so not having it in this game seems strange. im not talking about adding the sound to one of the cores/threads...im talking everything in the game engine should be multi-core that can be multi-core. here is my take on it. it just seems like the people who used to make the addon cockpits for lockon did the same thing for this game and then resold it as a new game when really it just has new sounds (radio messages) and new cockpits that are clickable. i want to see new terrain and geometry.....for some reason when i watch the videos of DCS: A10C it looks just like i was watching lockon original. im sorry but unless someone can show me a side by side comparison it looks the same to me for those 2 games. its just like falcon 4 original vs allied forces.....you can completely tell its the same engine 100% if you do look at hawx 2 gameplay it does look 100x better imho.....now its flying area might not be that big or what not but it does at least look newer. same for IL2 and all its updates.....you can tell its off the same engine and nothing new. when are we actually going to get a new game that was designed from ground up for todays hardware instead of coming off the same old game engine? i dont want to sound ungrateful because without this update then we are left will nothing....i mean it would be il2 (latest version) or allied forces or FC2 or Blackshark. so i am glad DCS did this game but for $60.00 shouldnt we really be getting something brand new? i would think more like the $30.00 range would be more expected. i sure wish there was a demo.
  15. so because i want an updated game engine and physics "then i must want an arcade game like hawx" that is why i told you i bought janes f15 and janes fa 18 and falcon4 and then lockon.. do any of those game start with "hawx" ok dont pull that card please. i just want a GOOD UPDATED SIM is that to much to ask for?
×
×
  • Create New...