Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


About Fudd

  • Birthday 01/02/1979

Personal Information

  • Location
    San Diego, CA
  • Occupation
    Environmental Scientist
  • Website
  1. x2 If you're talking about Remote Desktop, it wont work with a direct x application running. Also FYI there are some Win 7 versions that do not have Remote Desktop. I've become a fan of Team Viewer, it works well (but you have to buy it for server OS's).
  2. I can confirm that it does work on regular Server 2003. If your going to upgrade I would suggest using a non server OS. It is easier to find remote operating software that you dont have to purchase.
  3. I went back and looked at the 159th Forums during that time period and found the answer. We upgraded operating systems, because we couldn't get the NSIS installer to work with Server 2003 WE. We tried what nscode had suggested and then even tried ripping an ISO of the DVD. Both attempts did not work. We did confirm that NSIS.exe worked on Server 2008 WE, if thats any help to you.
  4. We had this same issue with our server when it had Server 2003 Web Edition. I PM'd Chizh to let him know about the problem, however I can't remember what the work around was. I deleted the PM I sent him, maybe he might have it still? Have you tried rolling back the service pack?
  5. I think what we call agree on is the FC2 behaves the best and has the most stability when running it stock. No ATC, no scripts, no tacview, no server export, ect, etc. Especially if we are going to stress an already unstable platform with 50-60 clients its stupid to try anything else. Want I want to do is test FC2 within its own confines. Standby for dates and times. I've started making missions to see exactly what our server and the software will and will not tolerate. We will also be testing staggered loadins by passing out the passwords in individual studs channels to see if that makes it easier for everyone to join. I think its safe to say though that LOCERF will remain as stock as possible until we iron out all other issues.
  6. The hope was that there was some stability/functionality gained in FC 1.2 versus 1.12 when hosting 50+ clients. We were proven wrong! The moderating staff now has to figure out what FC 1.2 will and will not tolerate. Most likely there will be some type of stress tests planned with different missions, triggers, etc. To sum up the event: The first failure was due to the server running both FC 1.2 and ATC (clients getting dropped repeatedly) The second faliure was due to IC issues. The third failure was due to a corrupt server config file. The fourth failure was a server.exe crash most likely due to the mission. We will work with the 104th to try and figure out the cause of the crash. Thanks to the 51st, =RvE= and 104th for trying to host this God awful mess of a Red Flag! EDIT One other thing: We need to treat the situation as if FC 1.2 was just not designed to have that many players in game at one time. We may have to return to a static map, few or no triggers with no moving AI.
  7. Briefings are posted on the 159th Forums
  8. Forgive me for posting in English. The teams have been assigned. The Russian pilots requested 8 positions. 4 lead by =RvAF=345 and 4 lead by =RAF=Nomad. I therefore posted the pilots on the blue team as =RvAF=1: Mig-29S =RvAF=2: Mig-29S =RvAF=3: Mig-29S =RvAF=4: Mig-29S =RAF=1: Su-27 =RAF=2: Su-27 =RAF=3: Su-27 =RAF=4: Su-27 I'll let dragony handle any further clarifications. Respectfully, Fudd
  9. http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=922038&postcount=17
  10. TEAMS BLUE Fighters =DFA= Graywo1f: F-15 =RvE= Fusion: F-15 A.S: F-15 104th_Crunch F-15 104th_MoGas F-15 104th_Moa F-15 104th_Mac F-15 104th_Sparrow F-15 =RvAF=1: Mig-29S =RvAF=2: Mig-29S =RvAF=3: Mig-29S =RvAF=4: Mig-29S =RAF=1: Su-27 =RAF=2: Su-27 =RAF=3: Su-27 =RAF=4: Su-27 HiJack: Su-27 Ali: Su-27 159th_Moby: Su-27 Strike JaBoG32_Prinzartus: A-10A JaBoG32_Govinda: A-10A 104th_Tyger: Ka-50 104th_Gunny: Ka-50 104th_Manawar: Ka-50 SFJackBower: Ka-50 Svend Dellapude: A-10A
  11. TEAMS RED Fighters 3GO*CHN-405: Su-27 3GO*CHN-461: Su-27 3GO*CHN-479: Su-27 3GO*CHN-536: Su-27 3GO*CHN-414: F-15C 3GO*CHN-431: F-15C 3GO*CHN-490: F-15C =4c= Berkut: Mig-29S =4c= ZigZag: Mig-29S =4c= Kljun: MiG-29S =4c= sNip: MiG-29S =4c= Grom: Su-27 =4c= Jambo: Su-27 51st_1: Su-27 51st_2: Su-27 51st_3: Su-27 51st_4: Su-27 51st_5: Su-27 51st_6: Su-27 Strike =4c= Hajduk - Su-25T 159th_Pappavis: Ka-50 159th_Spetz: Ka-50 159th_TigGer: Su-25T 159th_Archer: Su-25T 159th_Nemesis: Su-25T Haril: Ka-50
  12. Extending deadline for STRIKE and CHOPPER pilots only (i.e. Ka-50, A-10A, Su-25A, Su-25T) New Deadline is Wednesday EDIT: Teams published, no longer accepting applicants. Squads may put pilots on reserve if there are cancellations or no-shows.
  13. I need as many pilots as possible. I'll take submissions up until Wednesday 2000 GMT
  14. Please see here: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=54309
  15. We just recieved all the submissions, A.S. I'll post a roster on Monday
  • Create New...