Jump to content

Chromius

Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    FSX, Flaming Cliffs 2, IL-2 FB, IL-2 CLoD, DCS A-10, BS2 KA-50
  • Location
    Manchester, NH
  1. That worked perfect. I just removed the ones I will never buy and now I do not have to click each end to find either my A-10 on one end to my hidden UH-1 at the other end. Just made a backup folder and cut them into it from from /DCS World/DemoMods folder.
  2. Actually, I would be interested also. I use CH Fighterstick, Propedals, CH Throttle. I had a set up for SU-27 mapped out, but would like to see your F-15 setup.
  3. Ok, so whenever Version 2.++ is finished it will be available to all. Regardless of modules owned. Was away six months and reading up on it, and it was starting to sound like I had to buy the Nevada map to get the new version.
  4. Just using this thread to ask a question. When 2.0 is completely done, 2.0 will be available to people who have NOT purchased the Nevada map? I have never had any interest in this map, if I wanted to do training in a non-combat zone like Nevada I would just use FSX A-10 with real weather and munitions addons. Strait of Hormuz is the map I am interested in.
  5. Hehe, "minimal time" if I had a way to keep track of all the time I have spent on flight sims and setting up controls, it would probably show I lost an entire year of my life. Excited too but waiting for full release.
  6. What about the timeline problem? We are looking at 1990-91 are we not? In 1990 if it was SU-27 vs F15c what versions of what missiles were available? In quantities. Would the US still have held back the newest AIM120? Aim-7 in Gulf war, yes AIM120 was available but what version and want quantities. The ER's were not available in large quantities at the time, so the match up should be the non ER version vs AIM 7 and AIM120b no c's. Did they have quantities of 120a in inventory in 1990-91? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_engagements_of_the_Gulf_War I am just asking, as I am working on a plausible 1991 campaign.
  7. Just an Idea, they may still be using R-27R's because of old inventory. It costs quite a lot to get rid of outdated unused ordinance. (One of the reasons for Vietnam and carpet bombing empty jungles was that it would have bankrupted the US to have properly disposed of all the leftover WWII unused GP bombs.) Even in the ground forces they would give you all kinds of extra live grenade fuses for the training grenades and ammo to waste during exercises so they did not have to be properly disposed of or checked back in. I have a question on the R-27ER field date, as I am working on 1991 pre-soviet breakup "plausible" US vs USSR mission. What date was the R-27ER available? Sometimes they are ready for combat but not employed as they saved the newest munitions for the big boys. Like in the Gulf War they had the AIM-120A but never used them they only used the AIM-7 Sparrow. So say July 1991, was the R-27ER available for the USSR vs the US still fielding the AIM-7 Sparrow and the AIM-9L (no p?)
  8. Awesome. I need the Harrier and some actual amphibious/air cushion landing craft and LVTP-7's and a WASP class ship that can use water way-points and carry and unload troops. Then we can create a realistic 1991 MP scenario without these wacky scenarios with all aircraft on both sides. Tactics ect.. may make some happy for MP but I am sure many people do not bother with MP as most of the scenarios mix "realistic" aircraft of sim quality with completely un-plausable scenarios. There is a pretty realistic, balanced and "plausible" Georgia 1991 "What if" MP mission that can be put together but it must leave out the A-10c. The AV-8 can help a little to balance it out further till an MP AH-64 is finished.
  9. The big question for me is, even though the new trees are collidable for objects, will they affect AI LOS for spotting and affect munitions. As it stands now trees do not offer any cover. Hopefully the new terrain and trees improves this aspect of DCS in general. Also, hopefully more time will go into improving CA in general after DCS 2 is released.
  10. I asked this question a while back and did not see an answer. Will ground units be hindered by LOS behind trees, and will rockets and munitions fired from air to ground also be affected by trees, and will it affect target locks/tracking? Will it affect AI seeing through trees for detection?
  11. Wow, a drag-able kneeboard. That is awesome. For me and KA-50 use (using a left-hand monitor) this plus working controls indicator will make it perfect for my use. Once the full release is done for A10C and KA50 is there any chance of adding support for other aircraft or rotary wings?
  12. Confirming UltraMFCD.Beta.1.0.0.71 does not work with Nvidia 352.86 I usually do not install every new driver but had updated them for the Witcher 3. And is the controls indicator bug also a WIP?
  13. Works great for my left hand 2nd monitor. But as was stated it stops the "Show controls indicator" Rctrl+Enter , from displaying which I use in the KA-50. A little fps hungry, but I was able to keep the in-cockpit displays and the displays on left monitor by toning down the 1024 to 512 on the inside and 1/2 fps on the external exported displays. Definitely interested in the finished product.
  14. With that mod, there could be some plausible "What if" Afghanistan scenarios.
  15. That sounds promising. Perhaps after Edge 2.0 is out there will be more focus on CA. I do not post here often, but I must check this site at least 3-4 times a week for any new news.
×
×
  • Create New...