upyr1

A typhoon module is on the way https://forum.dcs.world/forum/613-dcs-eurofighter/ I also wonder what else could we get as modules? Anyway more AI assets are always welcome and that's the only way we're getting modern RedFor so I would add the J-15, Su-35, MiG-35, MiG-29K

Yes we do. MiG-21 Bis, Mirage F1, Mirage 2kc, Uh-1H, I believe the F-5E, the F-4E will be a later variant. The F-14 variants are 1990s but as long as you don't do Air to mud will pass for the 80s. Then the A-6 and A-7 will be 1980s variants as will the MiG-29. The upcoming fitter and if the mess with razbam gets cleared up the Mig-23. The Flaming Cliffs planes We're missing a period Hornet, Viper, and an early F-15E.

The Super Jolly Green Giant would work great with the A-1 Skyraider.

Si eccellente. Thanks for beating me to this.

Better smoke and dust would be cool I'd also love to see the option of a smoke screen

We have ships with VLS tubes in DCS which can fire multiple missile types from the same tube. Right now we are stuck with a standard load-out it would be nice to have a slider where we can change the missile load-out. For example if a mission builder has flying an F/A-18 to defend the Marianas from a red invasion fleet they might decide to load nothing but SAMs in your battle groups' missile tubes

It would be cool to have kill marks

Since there is at least one gun cruiser on the way, I expect and hope to that the ED moderators team will tag this as already planned but in the lua tags and waypoint action drop downs I'd love to see see primary and secondary cannon as options.

Signs will be awesome sometimes I forget about even having combined arms ED needs to at least fix the VR

There are plans to include warships, I don't know what all is planned but here is what has been spotted so far. An Essex class carrier, I believe the Enterprise and a Japanese light cruiser, and carrier I don't know the class. I would love to see the Overlord invasion and Marianas fleets and my two Ahistorical requests the Alaska-class battlecruisers as well as the Kriegsmarine surface ships (Bismark and Scharnhurst class battleships, Deutschland class battlecruisers,

The Super Hornet would be awesome!!!! The American Murder Hornet is cool

Even if they are just AI they would be awesome to have.

This would be awesome if/when we get ground modules. My main question now is what sort of resources would it take?

This might be accurate for a tank. I have heard of a pilot during linebacker dropping an entire Phantom load of mk82s and seeing a tank drive away because he didn't score a direct hit.

We definitely need improved explosions

Someone could mod Jester via the API to do it. We will not provide Jester flying (or Iceman) at initial launch. Cheers I didn't think the ability to hand the controls to Jester would be possible at launch, though would there be any plans?

You might say it feels like a cheat, but it is realistic, in the real world Air Force Phantom pilots would let the WSO take the stick during in-flight refueling all the time becuse it was easier to do from the back seat.

ED has said no to easy mode AAR. However, there is no reason not to think about ways to improve AAR. RIght now I really wish we could get feedback from Mover or any other real aviator concerning AAR in DCS vs real life. It seems to me that the flying boom is harder than the probe and drouge method in DCS, is this the case in real life or is it just something weird about DCS? Some ideas posted so far Maybe something like this could work to improve the flying boom, the box should be smaller I'll only change my mind if I hear from SMEs saying DCS flying boom refueling is spot on. Next we have this No doubt we need better training missions over all. I've suggested having a training campaign. My own suggestion on the section was to enable Jester to take over and refuel the F-4E- that would only work in modules that use Jester and have controls in the back like the F-4E

If my vr and dcs worked in Linux I would get rid of windows

This is great news,

I didn't think you meant spawning as a downed pilot, however, I would expect most people who would want to remain in character as a downed pilot would also be the same ones who want to play as infantry. I also think that we should have better CSAR and downed pilot mechanics for the AI The idea for the downed pilot unit was so that folks do a rescue mission in SP as practice. I'll be blunt if I am shot down I would rather fly the Jolly Green giant or Sandy conducting the rescue operation however if you want to wait around to get picked up that's all on you. Either I think we can both agree better SAR would be welcomed in DCS.

https://www.moody.af.mil/About-Us/Aircraft/Article/3516396/hh-60w-jolly-green-ii/ The current Jolly Green Giant is the HH-60W which according to Wikipedia is a modified UH-60M.

You might be right that noone would want to play as a downed pilot, however adding CSAR to s would be an excellent argument for adding the mechanics to the AI. i figure you could have a pilot/airmen equipped with the proper signaling equipment in the units list. I don't know how many people want the feature to play a a downed pilot but I expect it overlaps with the same people who want to play as infantry. Either way can we at least get the AI mechanics

As someone who has suggested adding profiles called "common plane controls" and "Common helicopter controls" I think the answer would be to add a "last modified tag" When you finish setting up the "common control" profiles it will ask if you want to push the changes to your installed modules. Then when you install a new module it will read the common controls profile to set up the common controls

I only have two qustions the first is why the MH-60 which is used by the Coast Guard and the second is which blocks of the F-16? I'm assuming you want the MH-60T to add SAR to DCS which I'd love to see, however, if it is realistic we would be more apt to see a UH or SH-60 with the option to install a rescue hoist. As for the F-teens I'd love to see A and early C models