vitabutch

It works fine in 2.7.9 after mission file edition like Urbi described.

For some reason campaigns are not progressing on my openbeta. First mission ends ok, I can see a debriefing text file as well as a y/n dialog on results. But after the second mission it never appears again. So I have the only option to replay 2nd mission endlessly. I am pretty sure its because of ED changes. Does anyone find the fix for that? P.S. I dont use prune script since it will limit the battle only at the player area. So no battle damage across the whole map. Original mission is heavy, it lags on the airfield, but once I am airborne its pretty good.

I didnt feel cross eyed in DCS in odyssey+, but compared to the other vr apps my eyes feel tired. Can anyone give a hint for me how do you check and remove misalignment? Many thanks in advance! Отправлено с моего SM-A520F через Tapatalk

There is no rocket science behind repainted scrapped fishbed seat, stick and pedals with couple of joystick sensors + cv1 rift set. IMHO license violation (if any) needs to be addressed by Eagle Dynamics.

Тогда уж лучше Синая.

Fishbed in its current state just an example of fantastic visuals and horrible coding. You will not be able to fly it simply because of the poor performance. In case you have VR, the presence feel in the cockpit is just stunning. Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

You wount get a reply here pal. Few guys will come and say they fly mig with no issues. And this ain't true, the product is unfinished and developers has washed their hands. No any single cent from my pocket to exLN developers. Period. Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

I quit Fishbed quite while ago since in VR it's unusable. Even though it is my favorite aircraft type. It is obvious devs to stop their care about this product. They haven't even commented a single post about mig for ages. So I will keep out from exLN products in the future until we see the real deal about all fancy stuff they whistle around. Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

Sure, here you go: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=188549 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=186398 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=185700 (You wount find a comment from the devs especially in the recent threads from above.) No offense here, but I dont buy comments like "its not our baby anymore". That was the product created by literally the same team that is working on F14 and MIG was never finished and never performance efficient. Too bad since I like a prototype a lot and wanted to have it in the DCS for ages. I dont have Viggen (actually its probably the only module I didnt buy for DCS) because of the concern of performance. For exLN products I can say that 3D work is a masterpiece, no doubt about it, but the art of game design is to build a product that is good in all aspects, graphics, usability and performance. That is my opinion.

I have also msi 1080 & i7 3770 @3.8GHz. No way I can use LN stuff especially in the open alpha. Two threads with stutter complaints in the Mig forum with not even a comment from the devs. Looks like everybody's busy with 3D artwork. Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

Buy VR first and you'll see LN planes are very unusable. Mig21 as an example - stuttering as hell in VR. I wount buy anything eye candy looking from exLN. It just don't fit to the age of VR. So you can choose the right word for yourself buddy. Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

I had stutters every half a second even before 2.1. But its working better in 1.5. But overall performance is terrible compared to the Belsimtek modules for example. Mig is out of focus indeed. And I wount buy any more ex-LN planes so far just because of that. Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

The boxes IMHO are way big for knee mount if you think about VR. I would recomend momentary tactile knobs mounted on PCB for the Mark II version. ;) Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

Mig 21 is unplayable after 2 updates back with huge periodical stutters. I wonder if it's only me experiencing it still? No reaction from devs in the neighbor thread explaining the issue. Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

I have also massive stutters in Mig21 module with version 2. It happens everywhere and looks like periodic hiccup 2-3 times a second. Other planes runs fine. Devs definetely needs to have a look on this. Mig21 is my favourite plane. Cant stand it stays in handar now/// (((

Я взял, поиграл 2 часа и вернул. Не понравилось вообще. Тоже самое, что и предыдущие части, только юниты другие. 4й раз евген хочет впарить одну и ту же игру за 1399. Хорошо, что в стиме для таких девелоперов есть возврат средств. Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

Да, вчера видел. Кто попробует, отпишитесь пожалуйста, как вам игра. Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

Не знаю насчет MoW, мне нравится Graveteam Tactics: Miuss Front. Одно но - там НЕТ СЕТЕВОГО РЕЖИМА. А иначе бы это была просто бомба. Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

Быстро с топика самой темы соскочили. А по сути скажу - Эскалэйшенз так себе поделки. Графика и механика классные, но танчики, летающие по карте со скоростью формулы один совсем не вставили. Моддинга нет посему забил на все евгеньевские фигушки. Хотя в стиме все куплены Отправлено с моего SM-N910C через Tapatalk

Too much of the weird science :) BRD N is a cool stuff. No way to compare with plastic toys.

Here you can find the box dimensions. http://avia-sim.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=829 Shorter stick will not be a prblem at all, you will need just to use less springs in the cam load. However, take a look on another possible problem. BRD-N is a WW2 type floor stick for the pilot seating upright with the straight stick. If your racing seat is inclined you will have problems with the vertical straight stick because of its mounting position but not the length. Curved stick would make this problem solved, but Baur said its not in his roadmap. So you will need to bend it yourself or make a new one from scratch. Cheers, V

But be ready to spend A LOT of time assembling nuts and bolts. I had 3 devices from Roman. Each of them took approximately a day to assemble.

Hi, one more idea to be used for the gaming chair setup. My mount puts N1 a bit closer to the seat since I have different chair design. I am using VR for flying, so office chair helps me to see the back of the plane by rotation of the chair. I made a bit more heavy mounts and the pictures should be self explanatory. Now its winter so parts are not painted and made quite rough. I will make it more sexy looking by the summer time. Both N1 and pedals are from Baur. Btw I sent my modifcation to Baur and he might come up with "factory" adjustable setup coming with N1 as an option. One more comment - I desided to use MMjoy as a controller. Baur ships his own, its preconfigured and have nice looking PCB's and wires. My home made PCBs and wiring should be considered as skunk work prototype :)

I also noticed that. Even touching motors by hand and feel the difference. However I use gametrix seat only for few weeks via USB control only since I am flying with VR and it doesn't have analog audio jacks.

Я попал в какую-то параллельную реальность? Во-первых, написанное выше по моему мнению полная чушь. Во-вторых, пожалуйста не надо на форум железных кокпитов тащить то, что должно быть на reaa (кстати, там это знающие люди заслуженно закопают). И наоборот. На МСФС уйма сделана коммерческих тренажеров и уйма денег распил.. заработана, что у нас, что за рубежом. В тех тренажерах вся внешняя визуалка так, для галочки, они тренируют, в основном, процедуры в кабине, там важен ее макет и расположение органов управления максимально близко с прототипу. И без кабины "мегасофту для настоящих пилотов" грошь цена.