Jump to content

*Rage*

Members
  • Posts

    3380
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by *Rage*

  1. On 8/19/2022 at 12:35 AM, Chazzza said:

    Hi there, I've got a couple of questions about the chair/accessories if I may:

    1. When was the chair purchased and delivered? I know the MFC-1 was Monstertech's first offering, so some of the older chairs use older parts that were upgraded in later models (their lineup now uses the same parts across the whole MFC range aside from upholstery).

    2. Can you clarify which mounts this chair comes with? You state that the chair comes with "side Joystick/Hotas mount, centre Joystick/Hotas mount", but in the parts table it seems that there are two side mounts and no centre mount?

    3. Do you have any pictures of the chair (might be easier to clarify my question 2 above if you've got a picture of it setup)?

    I would be using it with a Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS. I think the Warthog flight stick will work with the FSSB mount from what I've read, but I'd probably have to modify the throttle mount to make it work with the Warthog throttle unfortunately (getting a proper mounting plate shipped from Monstertech would cost 69 euros + Tax, so I'd try to avoid that route probably!)

    If you could answer any/all of these questions it'd be much appreciated.

    Thanks!

    Hi,

    1) Purchased and delivered June 2021.

    2) It has a centre stick with FSSB mounting plate (fits WH stick) as well as a throttle side stick for VPC throttle and a separate side mount for a mouse. You could probably drill the holes fir a WH throttle or just use double sided velcro tape. 

    3. I'm away till the 3rd September. Can send pictures then. 

     

    Sorry for late reply! Away for a couple of weeks. 

     

  2. But it's solved!

     

    ED simply won't respond until they're ridiculed by the community on Hoggit and YouTube. Only then might we get a "We're sorry its such a cringefest" video by Nick Grey and he kicks the Devs into fixing it.

    tempFileForShare_20220428-181842-1.jpg

    • Like 14
    • Thanks 1
  3. Thanks for the explanation Ironmike and HBs continued work!

    On the basis that HB haven't changed the ECCM and notch resistance for any of the 54 variants may I now draw your attention to the other 800lb gorilla in the room...namely that 54 is not only much more difficult to notch at low altitudes once active than the 120, but it also is much more likely to re-acquire. 

    I dont have hard data on absolute notch resistance and ECCM capabilities. But if we accept that the 54A seeker is analogue, and was superceded by the digital seeker in the 54C, which itself formed the basis of the 120A seeker, which again was superceded by the 120B and then 120C variants, then it cant be right that a 54A is harder to notch (and keep notched) than a 120C5 decades newer and more advanced. 

     

    The 54 is 50 years old now and has long since been replaced by the 120 for Air superiority and fleet defence duties, yet it is still the most dangerous within respective NEZ. 

     

    Thanks again. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...