pered
最新回复 发布由 pered
-
-
Will this F-5 have the INS navigation sytem?
No.
-
They used iron man as scrap iron for the tailhook.
-
Oh, nice! Here's a demo track.. the lock is dropped somewhere between 20-30 degrees, you will see how it goes ;)
Stuge, you are seriously not helping right now. RAZBAM has had one module out, its first one, and even though it came out slightly too early, they are handling it very professionally. Stop treating them like they ripped you off, cos they didn't. It's a premature open beta, stop complaining. Give them credit for the speed they're improving it at.
-
There's 51000 members on the forums, say 20% own a module, it's still 10000. I think the community is much larger than what we think.
I do agree that trainers are rather unnecessary. In RL they serve the purpose to avoid crashing expensive fighters and attackers, but in DCS, hell it doesn't cost us anything to crash.
It should be a good year though, few trainers (tucano) and many fighters and attackers. (F14F14F14F14F14F14F14F14F14F14). 2017 is going to be a social life free year with DCS becoming so good.
-
I know by hard facts due to experience with LNS that they will deliver no matter what, an excellent and ground breaking product. That's why I would pre purchase LNS.
-
Wait is the F word still considered mysterious for the under 13-18 community?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
They're targeting the Australian market now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
You're such a snake cobra...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I'm starting to think cobra is actually spanish due to his punctuality, but hey then again he works his ass off, so he can't be
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
10 bucks we won't.
-
I believe so, if I recall correctly, radar detection is based on RCS values.
-
I'm not sure what you're asking - 'radar up and down line'?
The numbers on the radar cursor at the moment are the distance (in nautical miles, on the left) and the left/right offset (in degrees, on the right) for the cursor position relative to your aircraft.
Next to the antenna elevation there is a number changing from 1,2,4. This is the scan zone.
-
Hey, if you get half of one wing blown off, sweep the undamaged wing and fly as per usual?
-
Feed me newssssss, I'm hungry.
-
First picture is mirage 2000D, second is -5. MICA IR will not be implemented to the Mirage 2000C, this has already been discussed.
-
Best news of the year, keep it up Razbam!
-
Hrothgar always there to cause controversy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Complex modules require years of develop time (ED EDGE engine and F/A-18C, Belsimtek Helos, LNK F-14, VEAO EFA, etc) and ED implement the necessary technology into the core engine to work some required functionality. If somewhere think that is work take only 1-2 years, you missing the point.
Actually, meanwhile we dont see a official stament by ED put a release date and DCS: W version release plus 3rd party release info, we only take care and a patience wait for some develop news.
I agree, it's very complex and they will take their time to get it to almost release state. I fully understand the time it takes to develop such a module.
Que solo era una broma joder! :D
-
Many weeks, months, years I've spent researching this issue that we all have to face in the DCS community. I have finally gathered enough information to understand why it has not yet been subject to release.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
It's TOO good and Leartherneck doesn't want to share it with us.
:lol::lol::D
Can't wait for it, the excitement is killing me, surprise us LNS!
Love you
-
1
-
-
It shouldn't lift up if he's leaving
-
Thanks for speaking up on this "issue" as well. I agree 100% with you.
For me, anything that cannot be simulated because it's classified or not readily available can still be "emulated" based on the underlying principles. There is no magic or alien technology involved. Everything can be derived from other sources and implemented by the means of emulation if need be.
AFM/PFM/EFM flight modeling can be based on geometry, shape, weight, and thrust, etc, and I am sure there isn't a lack of info out there in general.
I would love to see ED upgrading existing variants of outdated aircraft to match what's happening in the real world. Right now, DCS is "frozen in time" when it comes to upgraded military hardware, and that's a real shame.
Nothing is stopping ED to (for example) merge the Su-25A and Su-25T into the Su-25SM and/or merge the Su-27 and Su-33 into the Su-35. These changes are all very modular - like it was in real life. ...one can dream.
But this is a different topic than Polychop Helos... so I stop my rant. ;)
Documents about new technologies are not available to developers, so we have to live 20-30 years in the past for 100% fidelity aircraft in DCS.
-
Awesome!
-
Hmmmmm, if you're trustworthy, hit us with information!
-
I did catch that, just couldn't resist. Although I have to add, once Viggen is released people on multiplayer servers will start saying that a lot more. :D
Because they'll be spaming those AIM120s at us.
DCS: F-5E!
在 DCS: F-5E
发布于
Real flying involves VORs and TACAN
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk