Jump to content

Breakshot

Members
  • Posts

    729
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Breakshot

  1. There have been charts of both Russian and Ukrainian data that clearly show this shortfall. Rs fit these data in DCS, ERs fall short. Why the discrepancy?! But there are other IMO bigger issues with ERs. For example how can this missile have PURE pursuit HOJ homing!? No missile would ever use such a PN for guidance, its pure nonesense. Yet only R27 family suffers this terrible modelling. While Aim7s are literally FnF vs Hoj targets with perfect accuracy. Go figure!
  2. Seems like a good rant. But the funny thing is, everyone seems to take the AMRAAM Pk at face value of a brochure or test fire results against drones. Sure it has 100% pk then.... I don't buy it one bit. Because history has proven once these missiles are used in real combat vs a maneuvering adversary.... Just like with 9X, the first result is usually a miss! How about in heavy ECM environment? Go figure. Armchair pilots always like to have it easy like in the brochures. Instead, the questions should be asked into why these missiles are so easy to notch. Maybe because the western RWR is modelled so perfectly without any sidelobes, perfect angle to 1degree. Making it as easy as lining up a marker to the 3/9 line.... Some might draw other conclusions
  3. Yep, same story here. Something broke the lighting with NS430. @ED
  4. When will HOJ logic be fixed for R27 family of missiles? Pure pursuit is not a proper guidance logic. At least bring the 27 to the same standard as Aim7 HOJ. When will SD10, with a 77 seeker act like one? The difference between two missiles in tracking is not even describable. Where is the consistency in modelling and when will both missiles be brought up to new API (aka new 120 standard)!? Thanks
  5. https://m.twitch.tv/videos/1446045420 For those who missed this final! Best round of the tourney.
  6. Normals for Fuclrum/Flankers is a MUST! Same goes with wing vapor effect. All this should be an easy addition for ED without too much effort. Bring the visual standards of all modules on sale to the SAME standard!
  7. Look at the clear charts posted by BlackPixxel above. The numbers dont lie. Something is going on, unless of course F15 is immune to temperatures compared to all other jets?
  8. So basically F15 isn't affected by air temperature changes like other planes - GG FM is OP Why is flanker so handicapped by ambient temperature!? Surely same laws of physics must apply for all AC....
  9. I think something is going on with drag with stores, also F15 is barely affected by difference in ambient temperatures like all the other jets (especially REDfor jets). So yes, with bags doing M2.3 seems unreasonably fast.
  10. This! Sounds about right with the current 5% shortfall of ER at low alt. Surely Ukrainian data should be looked at. Burn time is a very specific parameter! Отправлено с моего STV100-2 через Tapatalk
  11. I've attached a workable version with the above files removed that caused crashes. Hope that helps until @Mustang makes an update to the pack. Mustang Shaders 0.96B.rar
  12. Thanks for the nice event. Was fun! Especially in those Migs
  13. Big thanks to ED for supporting this initiative via their recent newsletter! Updates to come soon with mission details, etc.
  14. Awesome initiative. 51st PVO and 100KIAP might be down for some ceremonial flybys for some heavy Ru fighter flavour. Отправлено с моего STV100-2 через Tapatalk
  15. We are happy to report that M3 and Razbam will be looking to sponsor module prizes to the winning teams. More details to come! We are also working with Dart for seamless integration of the LotATC software in our missions for an immersive and realistic human GCI environment. All qualifying teams into the knockout rounds will receive a license key, courtesy of Dart! Do check this amazing software that is the gold standard for GCI operations in DCS: https://www.lotatc.com/
  16. Mig-29S not available? 51st PVO would be interested to fly in Migs Aircraft: Mig-29S Payload: 1ER/1ET, 2x77, Clean, centerline Payload#2: 2ET, 2x77, 2x73, centerline Roster TBD
  17. Squadron Name: 100th KIAP // 51st PVO Regiments (Timezone: 16-2100 ZULU) Aircraft Selection: Su-33, Su-27, Mig-29S Pilot Roster: [51☭] PVO [51☭] Teknetinium Su27 [51☭] Coxy Su27 [51☭] Roofies Su27 [51☭] Jack (P) Su27 Reserves: [51☭] Slutcher Su27 [51☭] Morri (K) Su27 [100☭] KIAP [100☭] Breakshot Su33, Mig29S [100☭] Rich Su33 [100☭] Frostie Su33 [100☭] BlackPixxel Su33, Mig29S Reserves: [100☭] Coxy Su33 [100☭] Yambo Su33, Mig29S [100☭] holimoli Su33, Su27 GCI Officers [51☭] Shamansky [100☭] Yambo
  18. F16 isnt affected by ECM at all, just yet. There is nothing wrong with Tomcat ECM apart from the fact that it is itself not affected by other ECM emissions. Отправлено с моего STV100-2 через Tapatalk
  19. IMHO, any competition/server that bans aircraft types, weapons or creates artificial rules because of "fanboy exploit cries" or simply due to DCS MP limitations/bugs is not running a DCS competition, but a political farce - as everyone then bickers about which exploit and bug suits them and which does not. Unfortunately DCS MP community has gone down that route lately in what is otherwise referred to as a "scrub mentality". (some good articles on this) Lets face it DCS will never be ESPORTs material and is not intending to be. It will always carry bugs and issues, and instead of banning shit that doesn't suit someone, rather be constructive and get the developer to solve the issue and address the problem. Nobody ever talked about banning Tomcat when the Magic INS was a thing, cause everyone at that time wanted to fly her. Now we have predominately F16/18 drivers banning Flankers (their easiest of threats), remove jammers (which work perfectly as intended), Ban missiles... not even Tomcats are spared! Its a shame on the competitive MP community to even be having this conversation. PS: Regarding the Tomcat, I hope those bugs are addressed as I am sure they would be soon.
  20. We have noticed this for a long time, seems like its some kind of notch-gate effect from the AWACS, but yeah should not be happening like that.
  21. Guys why has this not been looked at seriously and in-depth? An iconic, widely exported and retired aircraft with plenty info available (I would assume). @ED have you ever considered it? Anyone else thinks its the perfect and realistically possible module for ED or any third party to do? Отправлено с моего STV100-2 через Tapatalk
  22. Indeed something wonky is going on the F16 and pylon drag is at neg value... Might explain why its such a rocket ship This issue also affects the FM of some other aircraft like the Flanker for example with bomb racks reducing drag. Should be something for ED to look at for all AC. Correct modelling of ordinance drag.
  23. Yes, I am well aware of the new vs old api. I guess what I was trying to say is I'm so used to ERs missing badly in so many stupid and easy conditions that if I made a bug report everytime that happens (especially if I would get subsequently splashed as a result [emoji23]) I'd be flooding the forum by now! And yes I get splashed plenty, its part of the MP experience. Let's face it, DCS MP will never be perfect. Learn, adapt and move on. Its just cringy to see bug reports like this when all it really was is a case of salt more than anything. As to PVNK, he's a new cadet in 51st and is still just undergoing his formation training. Yet people are spewing dirt on him because he upset someone in a fight?? Not cool. Some respect would be nice. Play hard but fair guys. My 2c Отправлено с моего STV100-2 через Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...