Jump to content

Breakshot

Members
  • Posts

    731
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Breakshot

  1. There have been charts of both Russian and Ukrainian data that clearly show this shortfall. Rs fit these data in DCS, ERs fall short. Why the discrepancy?! 

    But there are other IMO bigger issues with ERs. For example how can this missile have PURE pursuit HOJ homing!? No missile would ever use such a PN for guidance, its pure nonesense.

    Yet only R27 family suffers this terrible modelling. While Aim7s are literally FnF vs Hoj targets with perfect accuracy. 

    Go figure!

    • Like 4
  2. Seems like a good rant. But the funny thing is, everyone seems to take the AMRAAM Pk at face value of a brochure or test fire results against drones. Sure it has 100% pk then.... 

    I don't buy it one bit. Because history has proven once these missiles are used in real combat vs a maneuvering adversary.... Just like with 9X, the first result is usually a miss! How about in heavy ECM environment? 

    Go figure. Armchair pilots always like to have it easy like in the brochures.

    Instead, the questions should be asked into why these missiles are so easy to notch. Maybe because the western RWR is modelled so perfectly without any sidelobes, perfect angle to 1degree. Making it as easy as lining up a marker to the 3/9 line....

    Some might draw other conclusions 

    😂😂

    • Like 11
  3. When will HOJ logic be fixed for R27 family of missiles? Pure pursuit is not a proper guidance logic. At least bring the 27 to the same standard as Aim7 HOJ.

    When will SD10, with a 77 seeker act like one? The difference between two missiles in tracking is not even describable. Where is the consistency in modelling and when will both missiles be brought up to new API (aka new 120 standard)!?

    Thanks 

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 1
  4. 20 minutes ago, Gypsy 1-1 said:

    How exactly is the F15 not affected by ambient temperature currently? 

    Someone could probably test the thrust and top speed curves and compare with the public manuals. Last time I checked (more than a year ago) you couldnt really perform a Rutowski profile climb and hit the charted speeds at high alt. I guess this may have been fixed hence why people think it's overperforming?

    Look at the clear charts posted by BlackPixxel above. The numbers dont lie. Something is going on, unless of course F15 is immune to temperatures compared to all other jets?

  5. So basically F15 isn't affected by air temperature changes like other planes - GG FM is OP 🙂

    Why is flanker so handicapped by ambient temperature!? Surely same laws of physics must apply for all AC....

  6. 15 hours ago, trenchfeet said:

    Should the F15 be performing at M2.3 at 30k currently under load? is this normal? 

    I think something is going on with drag with stores, also F15 is barely affected by difference in ambient temperatures like all the other jets (especially REDfor jets). So yes, with bags doing M2.3 seems unreasonably fast.

  7. @Chizh
    Have a look at this document: https://www.dpi-proceedings.com/index.php/dtcse/article/view/30688/29273
    It is about using the ukranian made R-27E missiles for surface to air applications, here they get called "Wicher"
    On page 14 there is altitude/speed over time chart:
    image.png.aed1d56229f5d032e4dc98cc323583bc.png We see a burntime of 9.5 seconds for the R-27E. This is very much in line with the values from the MiG-29 manual (8.6 - 11 s).
    Boost lasts 4 s.
    This!

    Sounds about right with the current 5% shortfall of ER at low alt. Surely Ukrainian data should be looked at. Burn time is a very specific parameter!

    Отправлено с моего STV100-2 через Tapatalk

  8. We are happy to report that M3 and Razbam will be looking to sponsor module prizes to the winning teams. More details to come!

     

    We are also working with Dart for seamless integration of the LotATC software in our missions for an immersive and realistic human GCI environment. All qualifying teams into the knockout rounds will receive a license key, courtesy of Dart! Do check this amazing software that is the gold standard for GCI operations in DCS: https://www.lotatc.com/

    • Like 5
  9. Squadron Name: 100th KIAP // 51st PVO Regiments (Timezone: 16-2100 ZULU)
    Aircraft Selection: Su-33, Su-27, Mig-29S
     
    Pilot Roster: 
    [51☭] PVO 
    [51☭] Teknetinium Su27
    [51☭] Coxy Su27
    [51☭] Roofies Su27
    [51☭] Jack (P) Su27
     
    Reserves:
    [51☭] Slutcher Su27
    [51☭] Morri (K) Su27
     
    [100☭] KIAP
    [100☭] Breakshot Su33, Mig29S
    [100☭] Rich Su33
    [100☭] Frostie Su33
    [100☭] BlackPixxel Su33, Mig29S
     
    Reserves:
    [100☭] Coxy Su33
    [100☭] Yambo Su33, Mig29S
    [100☭] holimoli Su33, Su27
     
    GCI Officers
    [51☭] Shamansky
    [100☭] Yambo

    • Like 2
  10. Is the "blinking ECM" is really an issue with the F14 ? I already tried with a friend (who was in a f16) and he could lock me easily from 50 nm + at high altitude (both in TWS and RWS), even if i was "making the ECM blink" by pressing it on/off every seconds. It seems pretty far away from being the "100% safety exploit"
    F16 isnt affected by ECM at all, just yet.

    There is nothing wrong with Tomcat ECM apart from the fact that it is itself not affected by other ECM emissions.

    Отправлено с моего STV100-2 через Tapatalk

    • Like 1
  11. IMHO, any competition/server that bans aircraft types, weapons or creates artificial rules because of "fanboy exploit cries" or simply due to DCS MP limitations/bugs is not running a DCS competition, but a political farce - as everyone then bickers about which exploit and bug suits them and which does not. Unfortunately DCS MP community has gone down that route lately in what is otherwise referred to as a "scrub mentality". (some good articles on this)

     

    Lets face it DCS will never be ESPORTs material and is not intending to be. It will always carry bugs and issues, and instead of banning shit that doesn't suit someone, rather be constructive and get the developer to solve the issue and address the problem.

     

    Nobody ever talked about banning Tomcat when the Magic INS was a thing, cause everyone at that time wanted to fly her. Now we have predominately F16/18 drivers banning Flankers (their easiest of threats), remove jammers (which work perfectly as intended), Ban missiles... not even Tomcats are spared!

     

    Its a shame on the competitive MP community to even be having this conversation.

     

    PS: Regarding the Tomcat, I hope those bugs are addressed as I am sure they would be soon. 

    • Like 6
  12. Guys why has this not been looked at seriously and in-depth?

     

    An iconic, widely exported and retired aircraft with plenty info available (I would assume).

    @ED have you ever considered it?

     

    Anyone else thinks its the perfect and realistically possible module for ED or any third party to do?

     

    Отправлено с моего STV100-2 через Tapatalk

     

     

    • Like 11
×
×
  • Create New...