Jump to content

Darkwolf

Members
  • Posts

    1595
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Darkwolf

  1. Already have a yoke, but as i'm the map & nav freak in the squadron, i'll probably be taking care of the nav' while drinking vodka :P
  2. Avant d'attaquer quoi que ce soit, je te conseille de réfléchir fortement à ce que tu va faire. La majorité des serveurs vont couper les exports via une nouvelle fonction, ce qui fait que ton cockpit ne sera plus fonctionnel qu'en solo et sur serveur privé. Avant d'investir dans quoi que ce soit, je te conseille de surveiller ça de près. Si tu joue dans une escadrille qui traine souvent dans les serveurs style blueflag, 104th, TAW... ben tu pourra juste regarder ton cockpit en pleurant. La nouvelle fonction va débarquer très rapidement, une question de semaines.
  3. Maybe because you will be able to spawn a BVR capable Mirage in our airfield, while we'll be able to spawn short range interceptor Mig-21 in yours ? Mirage and Mig-29 were fielded in the very same year. Why not put some Mig-15 while were talking about plane set ? :D
  4. Hey, don't cry over this - you have 80's Mirage 2000 with BVR missiles, where we have 70's Mig-21 with discutable weapons. ;-)
  5. madcatz have been at loss for several year in a row.
  6. They have been at lost for a few years, but 2015 saw them making some benefits. (source : their 2015 financial report) I've seen companies "on the edge" staying alive and some other "leaders" getting sold like bread. Also, regarding Thrusmaster, they are doing very well, and their own 2015 report shows they are aware of growing flight sim community (thanks, shit thunder), and they look into high end market. you can dig their financials thru Guillemot corporation website.
  7. Thrustmaster is just up the absolutely most needed product : An affordable, middle market, HOTAS. For now, customers had no choice but the ridiculous $aitek X-series, which is basically the same shit for years with a new plastic shell every few years. This will give a great alternative, especially with their quality stick. you guys all have a hotas and wants another of that kind, however, you are a tiny fraction of the market - they are plenty of people discovering flightsim out there, and have no choice but saitek. This will help getting more people into serious simming, as Warthog remain some kind of luxury that 99% of the community will never reach.
  8. Can't do much more in teamwork - We constantly flew on request fueling missions with the vodka folks, some even buying the mi-8 to support the action while not really motivated in the beginning with heliops. They is no teamwork as for now as round isn't started. Don't worry, when the campaign will start, we'll be around. No that's the result of a small experiment that shows you can just cheat with the model enlargement. I reported this to ED a few month ago, but doesn't heard anything in return. Anyone without much even experience in scripting, can simply edit the model size, and server side has strictly no control over this. And as a ground pounder, I personnally prefer no enlarged model as it **** up the A/G experience.
  9. :music_whistling: here is why model enlargement should be off ;)
  10. That's true. Blue should get more players. BAPR worth something like a whole squadron :D
  11. An news on 21 ? Our squadron is currently wondering what to fly instead....
  12. As i said in the other thread, whoever uses this for cheating is just as stupid as he can. Exploiting ED's imposter.lua is just way more easy and accessible to everyone, without any option for server control. :P
  13. Actually, you wouldn't have talked so much about this mod that noone would actually know about it. :P I still don't undertand all the rage about this mod. It is useless as a cheating tool as you can just use the imposter.lua to have instant display of everyone.
  14. Can't you just cut short all data that are relative to radar ? I'm wondering if ED staff knows a bit about their customer base. Homecockpit builder will badly get hit because of that, and if i can't play MP anymore, I will just get my money somewhere else. Let's just hope the IC system will block one of the most laughable cheat you can do in DCS, just editing the impostor.lua with notepad to get bigger blobs.
  15. Blue getting Mirage2000 as defense slot. Why are Red having Mig-21 ??? O.o
  16. Why you guys are debating about the "fair" and "balance", while the campaign has already massive balance issue from player count and quality. You can't get things 1:1 fair, or you rather go play Tennis Simulator. Having A-10, Su-25T and Ka-50 on restricted side could be fun to test, instead of staying in the "this not gonna be balanced" speculation. That'll make a nice assymetric scenraio with one side having very good helis, and one side having good planes. :) As per "X or Y" country has X or Y plane justifying their assignment to both side, this could apply in a 2000ish scenario, but not in a warsaw pact/Nato pact scenario where those country had not flipped their vest yet. Per all the complain i see on internet, they is a lot of folks wants this kind of scenario. Still, no need to be sad, BuddySpike team is actually making their best to have everyone happy by having several bluflag variant so it may eventually happen :)
  17. Congratulations! Its probably have been a long and tough ride for you guys, you really did well :) i'm really happy to see DCS and the flight sim industry expanding with new actors and products.
  18. You went blue with a mig-21. What's gonna happen is you go to gulag :P
  19. They are two export - local and global. local is just about the user plane, server is about everyone. While server has control over its global export, it has no control over local export. Here is the trick - the software takes local information, but share it with others. So if you detect one plane (local export), everyone that uses the software will detect it. (data fed thru a parallel network)
  20. I'm badly laughing from it. Fair ? How is it fair for the home cockpit owner ? Life is unfair. Let's start forbidding joystick, because joystick owner have an advantage over keyboard user. This is just bullshit at a very nice level. In the meantime, you guys don't even complain about "enlargement," which any people can cheat in 10 seconds with notepad.
  21. That's fine. Don't cry. Everything gonna be alright. R-3R needs a radar to be fired, and Mig-21 radar is not working anymore. :D I agree with statement tho ;) R3-R clearly overpowered. But since they are things that simulator and campaign doesn't model (cost / availability / fuel / plane and maintenance quality), it's pretty much ok for me :D [warning - long debate incoming]
  22. I still wonder if anyone actually find this fuel feature interresting :D
  23. Now we need to test the other 9999 codes to check for Ka-50 channel :D
  24. Su-25A is the best plane in DCS for (real) CAS. It is very manoeuvrable, fast, and tough. Its speed can allow you to escape or fight back fighters. Su-25T is more heavy. It is a great plane for tank plinking from standoff range. it is overall better than A10C, but still need some good skill in SA and mission plannification, as you don't have that 360° TGP.
  25. Chopper thing need to be tweaked. I will likely fly the event between Mig and Mi-8, but i will just NOT do anymore of those fuel trips. It was fine when i was not working, but after a full day of work and with only 1 or 2 hour of flight time every few day, i will just enjoy CSAR or capture. Not to mention that it is only a one sided thing : Red airfields are all scattered thru the map, while all blue airfields are packed together, so it's always 40min of flight for us, 5-10min for Blue.
×
×
  • Create New...