[two question about ACLS]

2 hours ago, ivo said:

Thanks, do you think that if the flaps are on half instead of full the CPL autopilot does not come into operation?

Yes, I mentioned that flaps must be deflected more than 37 degrees, which can be achieved only in FULL

[two question about ACLS]

Hi,

Check the position of the flaps, they should be FULL, not HALF. More precisely, their deflection must be higher than 37 degrees.

[DCS: F-16C Viper - Баги]

34 minutes ago, Oktyabrskij said:

В чем же тогда дело? В обновлении от 19.10 все работало, сейчас нет, и отображение с монокуляра пропало

4 minutes ago, Aero4000 said:

О. У меня нашлемка после взлета активировалась. Загадка.

Это известный баг, будет исправлен.

[Unrealistic speedbrake behavior?]

39 minutes ago, Manolo said:

Hi again, I did an informal experiment to document my feelings. I took 2 videos from the HUD (same lenght, 23 seconds). One is using the speedbrake + idle thrust and the other is the normal deceleration going only to idle. Same altitud and conditions.

With speedbrake speed the aircraft goes from 505kts to 319kts in 23 seconds

Without speedbrake speed the aircraft goes from 486kts to 329kts in 23 seconds

The difference of using the speedbrake or just idle between both is only 29 kts.... in 23 seconds. This doesn't look realistic to me. 

I tested and I have different results - 22 and 39 seconds. Could you make a track showing the problem?

[DCS: F/A-18C - Баги]

14 minutes ago, slava115w said:

По рулежке едет нормально... При разгоне такое чувство , что не форсаж включен (визуально руды в режиме полном... и внешне пламя присутствуют), а режим 80%... как будто что-то ооочень сильно тормозит самолет.... бывает всей впп не хватает чтобы произвести отрыв самолета... я уже не говорю про полет ( на режиме форсаж максимум разогнать можно до 350узл). СТОЯНОЧНЫЙ ТОРМОЗ ВЫКЛЮЧЕЕЕЕН БРО) 

Р.s. В обучающих миссиях все норм происходит, багов таких нет... а вот при создании своих миссий всегда такая хрень происходит...  Другие модули норм работают, а этот пздц... аж бесит... вот и покупай потом....

Проверьте опцию упрощенная динамика, на всякий случай. Она должна быть выключена. И не ругайтесь на форуме, пожалуйста.

On 6/2/2022 at 12:11 PM, Kril_FC said:

Взлетал вечером, садился уже ночью, в онлайне, ни Formation lights, ни Position lights не работают. Strobe тоже отказывается включаться.

А вы включили переключатель Exterior Lights Switch на РУД?

[F-16C - обсуждение]

8 hours ago, PUHXa said:

... Четвёрка плюс не лезет на рабочие для других четверок высоты? 

На данный момент немного завышено сопротивление подвесок.

[JHMCS roll alignment]

On 4/18/2022 at 3:22 AM, Frederf said:

No, the symbology is attempting to draw a vertically deposed set of symbols in the cockpit frame of reference...

I may have misunderstood your sentence. I thought that you suggest that the whole HMCS indication will rotate to be roll stabilized. But after a few readings, I assume that you were only talking about the indication of calibration? If so, it sounds reasonable, but we have to make research to be sure.

[JHMCS roll alignment]

2 hours ago, Frederf said:

By slewing with the radar cursor.

The point of calibration is that the helmet symbology is projected accurate to the outside world. The pilot's head "zero" is irrelevant. This isn't like TrackIR where centering is an event that assumes a particular orientation. We're smoothly adjusting a control until two images agree.

Could you provide any reference to prove your point of view, please?

[G-limiter allows gross over-g on the airframe]

1 hour ago, Rissala said:

...The effect is pronounced with low A/C weight and oscillations. This should not be possible as the FCS should protect the airframe's 7.5G limit...

As far as I have seen, you made very abrupt stick movements. Some confirmation that these are acceptable and won't lead to any over-G would be very helpful.

[Weight]

27 minutes ago, Dragon1-1 said:

For the first part, it's probably rounding error. DCS is made by an European company, so internal values are metric. One kg is about 2 pounds, so you can expect errors of that magnitude when things start to add up. Basically, what the system shows you as "4lbs" may internally be something like 1.67kg, which, when multiplied by two, will give you 3.34kg, which would be shown as 7lbs. So you appear to lose a pound somewhere, and depending on the rounding method used, those errors may accumulate.

Second part looks like a genuine bug.

You are right. Internal calculations are in kilograms, and then converted to pounds. So it's more of a display error.

The second is also display error. Rearming window doesn't take rack weight into account. Internally it's all calculated correctly.

[F-5E Fuel Auto Balance Switch does not reset, draining right tank past balance.]

On 3/29/2022 at 5:58 AM, Durin2 said:

Ahoy!
I had this problem many times, but in a recent short training flight against an Ai F-14, this happaned again and this time i remembered to save the track.

Hi! Thank you for report!

Сould you elaborate on how you toggle this switch? Only with a mouse? Or do you also use a toggle switch on a joystick?

[High AOA Sutter problem - AGAIN WITH RADAR ALTIMETER ON]

Hi, 

please add a short as possible track replay so we can take a look.

Thanks!

[HUD EW stems overlap]

1 hour ago, Ahmed said:

In any case, symbols, at least in offset mode, should not overlap and they do in DCS.

The short video scene linked below has a very good example of the priority logic and how symbols don't overlap... 

Interesting video, thanks! But I don't understand how priority affects overlapping. I agree with the note about the offset mode. Also, after watching the video, we cannot be sure what is happening and for what reason. Offset mode could be on, probably.

[triple GBU-12s]

On 3/24/2022 at 10:24 PM, Hardcard said:

@Bunny Clark

Notice that, just like gbu-12s, cbu87/97 are also limited to 2 on pylons 3 & 7... yet 3 of them are allowed on the inner pylons (4 & 6), whereas only 1x gbu-12 is allowed.

This is a valuable comment, we should study and correct if necessary. 

[Cannot set LASER code via DED when aircraft is hotstarted in the mission]

Hi, 

please add a short as possible track replay so we can take a look.

Thanks!

[Select Jettison Works with Master Arm on SAFE]

Hi, 

please add a short as possible track replay so we can take a look.

Thanks!

[Autopilot Head & Steer no longer work]

Please, check your joystick input. If the stick is not in the neutral , the autopilot won't control the jet. You can check position of the stick with Controls indicator (RCtrl+Enter by default).

[F-16 Excessive AoA in level flight]

For better test results change temperature to +15C. Default is +20C and hence the need for recalculations.

[Flight model of my dreams]

If you have bugs or issues, please make an appropriate thread in the bug forum with all required info. Thanks.

[Concerns about G-Onset and Damage to wings]

36 minutes ago, =475FG= Dawger said:

Thank you for posting your track.

I think I may have some additional insight into why this is happening.

Your track appears to be very precise control movements resulting in the ability to apply full roll deflection (up to the limiter) at high G levels.

So we know that we should have the ability to do this, which is good news.

My question is in relation to the hardware and control tuning you used to fly this track?

With my setup, I am seeing unintentional elevator inputs when the aileron deflection limit is reached, resulting in additional load and subsequent catastrophic wing failure.

This also would explain why some people experience a very fragile wing and others seem to have no issues.

I would like to track down the root cause.

Again, thanks for providing a much needed clue.

I'm using Thrustmaster Warthog. I always set 3-4 deadzone for pitch and roll axis. And I was trying to make a clean roll stick movement.

But I think the main reason I did not break wings is that F-5E is loaded only with 50% of the fuel and two missiles. This is the mass after which the acceleration limitation decreases. And with a greater mass it is possible that wing will break in a roll at lower G-load than in the track.

[Concerns about G-Onset and Damage to wings]

2 hours ago, =475FG= Dawger said:

The F-5 is now very fragile. If you introduce ANY (and I do mean the tiniest amount) roll input at 8 G or above, the wings will come off. Extremely silly but it doesn't look like it is going to be changed.

Could you confirm this rather strong statement? I think that you are wrong and I provide this track. 9-10G roll with a stick up to the limit.

F5_9G_roll.trk

[F-16 HUD messing up after take off]

9 minutes ago, shayan said:

it should only your flight path marker ( flight path vector, velocity vector) goes left or right not all of your pitch ladder bars !!!

Could you confirm this with some evidence, please?

[F-16 HUD messing up after take off]

1 hour ago, shayan said:

so is this normal it should permanent looks your hud like that even after you not applying any rudder ?

Perhaps I misunderstood you. There's a wind in the mission that leads to drift.

[F-16 HUD messing up after take off]

I see a lot of pedal deflection when the nose wheel lifts off. Because of this, a large moment arises, turning the nose to the side.

Spoiler

[Баги и Проблемы F-5E Tiger II]

On 12/31/2021 at 9:52 PM, rueveet said:

Никогда не думал, что F-5E с ТАКИМИскоростями летает........................... . 

Уточните, с какими "ТАКИМИ"? Что происходит, что должно происходить по Вашему мнению? Трек, чтобы посмотреть, что происходит?

On 2/5/2022 at 1:45 AM, FAB999 said:

Пожалуйста ,сделайте что б тигр не мог крутить полный комплекс пилотажа с оторванными крыльями !

ну надоел уже это цирк ! сделайте НЕ равномерное ломание крыла то !

ну все впечатление портиться  

Трек, чтобы посмотреть, что происходит?