NECK

Some screenshots from the start of the new year:

The 388th Virtual Fighter Squadron is now reopening our recruitment for new pilots. Our current class have graduated from their Mission Qualification Training and are well underway doing their Continuation Training and we have again Instructor Pilots availeble to take in a new class of F-16 pilots that want to fly as part of the 132nd Virtual Wing.

Great news! Thank you for the fantastic contribution to the DCS community!

Great work! Thank you for the contribution to the DCS community!

EDIT: Closed for recruitment The 388th Virtual Fighter Squadron is now reopening our recruitment for new pilots. Our current class have graduated from their Mission Qualification Training and are well underway doing their Continuation Training and we have again Instructor Pilots availeble to take in a new class of F-16 pilots that want to fly in the 132nd Virtual Wing.

Hello Hammer 1-1 Both LGBs and buddy lasing are working. Atleast in the F-16 (Not tried the A-10 and F/A-18 recently, but it also worked there when I tried). Make sure that the one that is lasing is within 8nm distance from the target (slant range), if not it will not work.

Hello risali! We have been using it, both ground lased (from a JTAC, in combined arms), and air lased from another F-16, and it works for us. What is important is that the one that is lasing need to be withing 8nm (slant range) from the target it is lasing. If the laser is further away it will not work.

Great work! I am really looking forward to test this. I like the feature with powersupply and commandcenters, and beeing able to destroy these makes the IADS to autonomous mode. Thanks!

Do you have the A10 with presets on the NTTR mission? We have experienced that when we have presets set for the A10, then the same will be set for the F-16, regardless of what we put into the individual F-16 in the mission editor.

Great work Pikes and the rest of the MOOSE team! The DCS community is forever grateful for the hard work you guys are putting down in this!

Currently I can place other aircrafts that I do not own or fly, and I do not have a need to test them, I can not see how it would be different with the supercarrier? Is there really a large push from people that makes missions but dont own modules who suggest to get access to them to test while making missions? I think the argument is good and valid, and you that you disagree with it. But I have a hard time to see how the issues raised here are a good argument.

I fully support Snoopy on this one, and I am in the same situation for the 132nd Virtual Wing, where we have both a F/A-18C and a F-14B Squadron, where I build many of the wings missions (but do not fly the F/A-18C or the F-14B, and thus personly, I am not in the need for the carrier). I think ED should facilitate and support creating missions so pilots have a good way to spend their time within DCS , instead of making it harder to create good content for the communities out there.