Mainstay
最新回复 发布由 Mainstay
-
-
On 11/28/2025 at 12:14 PM, winghunter said:
You can create a separate reverse axis by using a modifier and curves.
This allows you to move your throttles all the way back without going in to reverse. They will only go into reverse when you hold the modifier button and move the axis between 0-20%. And while you hold the modifier button, you can't go into forward accidentally. It will only allow you to move between 0-20%.This can be done by changing the axis curves in DCS options.
Assign left and right throttles as normal, then assign a modifier + throttle to the Throttles 1-4Tune the curves for the throttle axis to level flat at 82
Tune the curves for the reverse axis to be flat at 82, then gradually rise to 100
Optionally, you can assign your second axis + modifier to something unused like TV, so it won't interfere with the throttle while the modifier is pressed.
Those screenshots are broken... could you make them visible again? Im having a hard time getting this to work.
-
3 hours ago, ThorBrasil said:
That's sad! I should have asked for a refund when I had the chance.
One positive thing is that the devs found a new employee in the form of Heatblur. So thats nice for them but i really hope that either all the code goes to ED or with the devs to heatblur otherwise its gonna be abandonware for these modules.....
-
1
-
-
Well one of the old devs just declared the CEO is MIA (as in skipped and hiding somewhere) and the entire old dev team is pressing charges and even filing criminal charges in Germany against the CEO.
He apparently didn’t pay anyone and ran off…..
So circus number 3 after VEAO, Razbam and now this one…..
-
1
-
-
Jeez what is going on…. Just give us some extra options for the SPO15 so we can set it as legacy mode or something.
Evidence of pilots is not enough, evidence of other documents is not enough but when the F-35 comes out all the the darkest secrets are implemented and that’s all fine… really ED what the hell.
-
9
-
2
-
-
This is still something I would love to see implemented in a future patch, please make this an option for those wanting to have a bit more choice in difficulty in the sim
-
2
-
-
If the Sinaï map doesn’t get way more love the wallet stays closed for the Balkan map. So it’s up to them to convince me otherwise.
-
9
-
-
+1000
-
Same here... just becoming a vague story more and more..
-
3
-
-
Still hoping for a hot drop!
-
3
-
-
18 hours ago, Ramius007 said:
I dont think that this "video game" designers, have to bow to small minority of arcade pvp servers participants, and balance modules around arcade style servers. For many people, only thing that DCS have going for them is realism, if you remove it, you can fly FC modules, free DCS mods or other game forever, there will be no diffrence with FF modules made in a way you like them to see. Issue is not realistic Fulcrum, but enviroment made by pvp server admins, that is balanced around assymetrical early XXI centaury conflicts, and made for majority of XXI centaury jets, and people who belive that Sparrow=CW. When they get actual CW technology they are shocked. This version of Fulcrum should compete vs F1, F-4, 530D less M2k, Tomcat without Aim-54, and all CW Fox-2 only fighters, and a lot of helos and attack planes, still plenty of platforms to choose from, and potential for great REAL CW server, where FF Fulcrum would be top of the food chain, yet difficult to master plane.
Get off your high horse sir and stop pretending your the chosen pilot to lead the pack!
People are simply asking ED to come up with a middle way that suits everyones "Happy" GAME experience.
-
4
-
-
9 minutes ago, Thirsty said:
That would be the way to go to in my opinion , however realisticly speaking that could very easly take years not months sadly.
On the side, this "unrealistic" or "legacy" option would also slove the most issues that are currently going on the forum, with the radar operation synch with the SPO.Exactly, either we get all the systems as they should be or postpone it till you can implement it in the way it should be. Otherwise a legacy button is the best way to go.
-
3
-
-
Well left or right imo a legacy SPO-15 would make the player base enjoy the best of both worlds on flick of a button...
-
1
-
-
On 10/10/2025 at 5:21 PM, The_Nephilim said:
Well I had bought a Razer Basilisk mouse and do not suffer this issue. I thought I would but for some wierd reason I can set it too 125,500 or 1000hz and it works just fine with no lag. I thought for sure the mouse polling rate was the cause for my minimul spikes ingame but it was not..
maybe the devs can get to the bottom of this.. I can post a log file if needed
Well it worked fine for me as well till the patch that introduced the MiG-29
-
-
I have the same issue...
My cursor was causing extreme lag ingame and when i stopped touching my mouse and the cursor disappeared everything is fine.
My report rate was set to 1000 from the range i have (1000/500/250/125), only after setting it to 125 DCS didnt start to flip out and had massive stutters and FPS drops.
Why cant DCS handle the higher report rates of the mouse? Mine is a Logitech G203 and i had this mouse for ages so its not the mouse (i used multiple of the same model)...
Besides DCS seems to be the only problem and i only had this since last 2 patches.
-
I would like this option as well.
Indeed make it work with radar on and launch warning and that would be awsome!
-
3
-
-
4 hours ago, Thirsty said:
For all the people whom have been flying MiG-21s and Hinds, (SPO-10 my beloved) not getting a launch warning is not a problem I think
And I hope this function will be pushed to all modules, inculding blue and red, so the case of the Magic RWRs that we have in most jets would not be the case anymore.
But sadly as for, that the RWR just not even possible to use, since it gives back constant lock tone from a ground search radar that is on the friendly side 100 plus KM away is absurd.
And this mixed with the unserviced SPO that can't work with a radar emitting (while it should, even if the reading could be chaotic in HPRF, but not even in MPRF there should be no problem)
and I don't want to get into details here about the R-27R API bug where the enemy rolls and the missile stop tracking, since this topic is about the SPO.
This things are core functions that needs to be fixed, since as for now other than enjoying the MiG in a traning server (what I have been doing greatly) you can't take it anywhere to fly in a digital combat setting, what ruins the point of a combat flight simulator.Exactly… either you do all the modules at once to create an honest battleground or just make it equal until you actually can.
But this is just absurd.
-
4
-
-
So will we see an improved version of the RWR system with launch detection and working continues instead of the “thing” we have now?
Realism is nice but since this is a sim it should be balanced as well.
I for one are really frustrated with the fact I don’t know when being fired at… don’t get proper warnings all the time while we have a whole fleet of modules that have a balanced suite of RWR systems unlike the real thing….
It just doesn’t make sense to put a brilliant module like the fulcrum in the DCS skies with such a weird choice of handicapping.
-
Well real or not for me your modded versions work better in VR when it comes to readability. And besides it’s a sim and not a real aircraft.
-
1
-
-
Thnx m8
-
-
12 hours ago, ouky1991 said:
Hi, I made those hud edit mods above, the mig has essentially the same folder structure, so if you follow the steps described here, you can do your own edit. If you feel like it would be to complicated I could share my WIP version of falcrum hud here
Oh if you could share it the MiG work that would be awsome m8! And thnx for the work you have done so far for other modules
ED should take a look at your mod and implement it for VR users in my opinion
-
1
-
-
This is a mod for the F-18 HUD.
Thats one example of a HUD that’s way sharper and better for VR usage. The lines ED uses are way too thick and blurred for higher resolution and VR.
Same with F-16 / AH-64 and now MiG-29…. Just try switching to night HUD on the Fulcrum and it looks way sharper and less blown up and fuzzy…
credits to mod maker
https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3328256/
-
3
-
-
I dont know if any other VR users are experiencing the same issues as me.
But i have to use mods for a lot of modules (F-18/F-16/AH-64/AV-8) in DCS to tone down the fuzziness and thickness to make it enjoyable.
Now the MiG-29 is the same problem all over again..... Night time mode the fuzziness and thickness of the displayed symbology and lines is perfect in VR. Why cant it be the same for the daytime mode HUDS for all these aircraft?
Its kinda weird that we have this problem for years now over multiple modules and people need to mod it while it has been requested many times.
Make a slider or something for users to adjust for VR maybe?
Anyways if anyone knows where i can find the files for the MiG-29 to adjust the DAYTIME HUD Symbology fuzziness and thickness im grateful.
I checked multiple folders and i cant find the .Lua with the right lines to adjust them to get things right.
Thanks in advance
-
1
-
Can someone explain the Auto-Reverse and Reverse Detent slider on the settings page?
在 DCS: C-130J
发布于
I would like a separate button to activate the reverse range on the throttle as well like many others are asking for..