Mmmslash

I don't feel like this has really been properly communicated by someone from ED, so I'll ask as directly as I believe I can: Is MAC going to be a DCS product that works alongside existing modules inside of the existing simulation? Or is this a separate product entirely? I ask because I can only find community folks saying the latter, and can't seem to find a response from ED saying so. All I take from Wags' response here is that it was pushed back to ensure quality.

Are GF Pro with MCG pro orders still expected to ship this week? Thanks!

Y'all gross. We just have an appreciation for our little buddy, the Harrier Stool.

Some friends and I have actually whipped up a little patch for the upcoming Harrier that prominently features a stool, front and center. We call ourselves Stool Boyz :pilotfly:

Starfighter :wub: :wub: :wub: There is nothing I long for more than to ZELL. I would love a G. A J would be weird and unique. I'd even be a sucker for an A and eject out the bottom. It all sounds good to me.

About 20 minutes ago.

Curious about this as well. I play on OC primarily, and I can't wait to do exactly this over there.

LNS did not participate in the Bonus system with the MiG-21Bis. It is not surprising, personally, that the Viggen will not either.

The Viggen's computer is pretty robust for it's time, and will likely be a pretty sizable chunk of the manual. You can expect a surprising level of complexity there, if I had to wager.

Appreciate the communication. I know some folks get ornery, but you do great work and we're all just very excited.

No one "lied" to you. This is the kind of stuff that drives me nuts. You're not owed anything. There is no magic deadline that LNS needs to meet to satisfy your wants OR ELSE. Things said months ago are obviously subject to change.

These guesses feel like they exist only to stir the pot. As far as I know, no one in here knows how long the certification process is. I'm going to assume that everything is fine, because I've been given no indication to feel otherwise. To do anything else is just guesses and assumptions, both of which do little good and contribute negatively, in my opinion. I know we're all very excited for the Viggen, so let's try to keep it positive.

I believe that refers to from ED themselves, Pocket.

This opinion is perpetually maligned but: I think there is plenty of room for FC3 level of simulation in DCS. In the same way that I can still enjoy IL-2 while loving the full-fidelity of DCSor BMS, I too can appreciate the FC3 level airplanes. Assuming the things Wags has said in the past are true (that the F-15C is the best selling module by a country mile) they greatly benefit the platform (DCS World), and I don't think it hurts to have more flyables (especially ones that new players could experience before moving onto study level simulations), assuming they are priced accordingly and their performance in-game isn't so made-up as to make it unfun for the rest of folks. At the end of the day, I would much rather be able to fly packages of AJS-37's in realistic scenarios with friends than not be able to. More fun for everyone sounds good to me.

You don't want handwritten scribbles in your expensive custom bound manual? :D