Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. That bug persist form more than one year, i'm pretty sure it happens on the civil version of the huey non tested in the militar one, but it's a known bug reported but never solved. it happens even if the autounhook is activated and even if the cargo is dropped with the emergency unhook
  2. OMG, awesome finished yet.... So sad for Berger 11 :D
  3. Good Morning, I don't have finished it yet, but let me say aerial refueling apart, this is the best campaign i had ever played, it's close to be real with an incredible level of immersion, my best compliment's to razbam. Only a negative note, i find difficult the radio management, is difficult to understand wich frequency keep on main radio e wich keep on the uhf. Some times i can't hear the radio comunications because i'm in difficulty to switch the proper radio on the proper channel. For the rest is terrific. Regards Gabriele.
  4. In that way i'm able too Inviato dal mio SM-G920F utilizzando Tapatalk
  5. Easy you continuosly disconnect...!? Inviato dal mio SM-G920F utilizzando Tapatalk
  6. You need something like 5kts of difference between the refueller and you to disconnect Inviato dal mio SM-G920F utilizzando Tapatalk
  7. Yes it is Inviato dal mio SM-G920F utilizzando Tapatalk
  8. I dont wanna defend no one and in some point i'm agree with you, but difficult doesn't mean realistic... i did aeronautic studies at the high school yes in italy if you want you can do aeronautic high school, and after the hig school i studied to be a sports car tester driver. From my experience a can tell you there are many realistic car simulator but the tendancy is to exagerate the phisycs, when you drive at 300 kmh you have many factor allow you to understand the where is limit, vibration yaw bump, feedback from the suspension and the steering... in the videogame is not possible so the tendancy is to globally increase the car reaction to make you understand what is going on... this is good but not extremely realistic because if you don't feel it with the body when you correct is late and the result often is a too big reaction... It happens in the flight simulators too, belive me is easyer if you have the right skills and knowledge drive a real sports car than a simulated one. And this is the same opinion for the real pilots... I work as a supplyer for an italian aeronautic company i was sharing my passion with some technician and pilots and they say the same vibrations are the 90% of the sensations. And you feel it with the ass and the body... Full mission Simulator are good training instruments. But they're not enaugh... The studends tipically overreact on the real machines because they are traind for the simulators where averithing is good simulated but not real. I don't want a autorefuel switch but the possibility to perform a good aar with normal peripherials and by keeping 2-3 knots of margin on speed it seems to be possible and in the same time realistic don't you think? Inviato dal mio SM-G920F utilizzando Tapatalk
  9. I have no problem to perform the contact and mantain the speed of the tanker, but for me 1 kt less of speed to let a disconnection happen is not realistic, themeccanical connection between the tanker and the aircraft is much stronger as you can see in this video coming from italian AF. ${1}
  10. Guys real pilots has ful scale control the ass on the aicraft and a peripherial vision related to a wider fov than 22 inches monitor... Inviato dal mio SM-G920F utilizzando Tapatalk
  11. Is already on charge Inviato dal mio SM-G920F utilizzando Tapatalk
  12. yes i use a similar way but i hope ed will add a different difficulty setting for the ar... Consider not everybody could have a full scale control not everybody can configure 3 monitors and not everybody has 12 hours a day do training, has i've already told in another post, i start virtual flying when i was 14 with msfs95 and did ef2000, no one is asking to be less realist, but to give the possibility to perform all the mission task to every one...
  13. let me say my impressions, ok is not impossible but the programmer had forgot one thing our ass is not on a real aircraft but on a chair in the middle of our room, i don't have the track ir, so the canopy of the m2000 obstruct the visual, second the tanker i smaller than the il 76 and the 90% is covered by the canopy frame, 3rd at this speed the throttle of my x52 is in the middle of a detent, so i've got to fight with th detents, the springs' the pov switch and the taker oeperator who is continuosly recovering the drogue every time i miss contact, that is possible but insane... In lomac it was a right compromise between difficulty and realism here is a non sense. Considering i'm able to refuel the su 33 the f 15 i start to think is right who sayis we need an option: Option Game, Refueling realism level, Easy, Medium, Realistic.
  14. Hi, i'm trained to refuel the su33, but i'm pretty unable to refuel di m2000, al the time i try to correct the aircraft attitude i get in to pilot inducted oscillations someone can help me to find the best way to refuel?
  • Create New...