HRZ

Mizzy?

Once you load the game, press ~ key and type in: "Poke 3245212"

In two weeks time.

Looks nice!

This guy wants to CUT every Flanker pilot's manhood - his long stick ET. Are you sure you want to trust him?:pilotfly:

Hey, you talk like those fancy 50,000$ suit lawyers..I don't understand a thing you're saying?:huh:

^^ Guys, don't pay attention to GG's poll. It's a product of capitalist yanki NATO fanbois organization. And GG is flying F-15C, which makes him dangerous to our freedom-loving goal of putting those nice additional ETs on our Flanker. And remmeber: by voting in this poll, you support CAPITALISM.

Your comparison is a bit off, don't you think? Regular A10s don't have AA radar nor they carry Amraams nor were designed to do so. Su-27 on the other hand, carries and deploys ET missiles and we had real-life photos of RuAF Flankers taking off with those missiles underneath. Reglardless of the 'unrealistic' performance they would have in Lomac, if planted under fueselage, they would still make a lot more sense on an SU27 then your Amraams planted on a Hog.:D

Of course, this is what I was referring to. Not everyone knows there's LOPE and how to use it, so it's quite ok. to ask this question. Take care mom! Love, HRZ

What? Already bailing out? Cmon man, not all votes are being counted. You still have Florida!

Vote people, vote, vote, vote and....vote!

Thanks for the info! So basically, we could have additional ETs on the Flanker as those can be used without coolant. The only problem would be, Lomac doesn't model "degraded" missile performance without the coolant, but that shouldn't be much of a deal as the missiles itself CAN be deployed from other pylons, and we also seen recent photos of those mounted under the fuselage.

Was I asking for your oppinion? No? So, why are you LOL-ing your way into my post? LOL-Off will ya?

Ok. let's recap: most of the people in the poll are simply sick of waiting for Black Shark. I suggest all those who voted the nr.4 option be given beta tester status.

Can you post a scan of that text or something? Just put it in the quotes and name the source, and FBI won't knock at your door for breaching copyrights.

Hepi brzdej tu lokon end lomak tim! Vuhuu!

Are you falsly suggesting I am his evil twin? Anyway, Pilotasso, the voting seems to be working? Try again?:joystick:

Vote...nah!

Pilotasso, you have too many poll options. My head will explode.

Hey Veljko, any word on Su27's basic AG capability, AG modes etc?

I suggest you edit your post and open a new thread, because what you're doing right now, is very cheap.

Any way of adding Kelly McGillis on the side of the runway? Even if it's a still 3d model. ???

Well, the first thought that occured to me, was the nice hot blonde, bit of a tan on her, with her nipples angels high and me going down on her, slightly taking off her bikini with my teeth and starting to suck juices out of her.. Uhm..I better go now..before it gets too hot..

I was referring to Hajduk Veljko's posted picture. It's not a mockup. And Haduk Veljko as well. But, when he referrs to some book, you start preaching him. Get real buddy. Sinodefense never lies. Western capitalist sources are full of disillusions and false informations. Yeah it can. Just use LOPE. Exlamation mark. Actually, I was only referring to YOU.

I have just realised -whatever- source gets quoted it will just be dismissed as 'unreliable' by the opposing side. This is turning into a circus. If you have a picture of a chinese SU27 loaded with AE, and if that's not enough argument, then actually NOTHING is and will ever be..oh. unless we get a Su27 pilot on these forums..but I'm sure even then, there will be people questioning his credibility.