Jump to content

uksub

Members
  • Posts

    71
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Sorry if I'm a bit dumb, I want to use sone of the modules under the free to play off, how do I go about that. The only option I am seeing on the store is Buy. Thanks for any help you can provide.
  2. Fair play, I could probably have worded it a bit better to be honest, so if I have caused offence then I apologise. Its purely that as I mentioned, your first two products were so good and diverse in terms of what they offered, that I wanted things to carry on in the same vein (I dont think I am alone in that wish). I understand that you need revenue to carry on and that FC3 provides that, I just enjoy the DCS Series and want to see more of it (I dont think I am alone in that either). Again, sorry for the slight bout of grumbling (I am British and we arent allowed to grumble, its the law apparently)
  3. Frankly, any ACTUAL DCS aircraft would be nice, rather than faffing around with Flaming Cliffs reworks and WW2 fighters (not enough of those around apparently). I really had high hopes when DCS was announced and they released the superb Black Shark and A-10C, as they were aircraft that were different and not the usual target of simming companies. After that it appears ED that are relying on 3rd party developers to provide the excitement. I bought that Huey and that is excellent, I just dont get why they seem to focussing on FC3 at the expense of more interesting fayre. Ho hum.
  4. Frankly I would just like ED to actually stop retereading old ground with things like improved fm's for the Su25 and A10a and start making proper DCS level aircraft again. That was the point of it all in the first place wasnt it? I had such high hopes after the A-10c that there was finally a company that were into making high fidelity study sims, and now they seem to have gone off in all sorts of directions involving ww2 aircraft (not enough wwii flight sims obviously) and making new models for flaming cliffs. The only saving grace is that there seem to be a few other smaller companies that have taken up the slack making interesting aircraft like the mig 21 and the huey.
  5. Brisse I have supported the company since it started out and bought Lock on, FC, A-10 Beta, Black Shark 1 + 2 so I think I stand in a pretty good place in terms of how much money I have thrown their way over the years. Six months down the line, I could staomch, but 1 sodding month is a kick in the nads from where I stand.
  6. Well frankly I feel more than a bit jipped by the Huey being $19.99 when I paid full price for the frickin Beta. Won't be making that mistake again with any modules from now on!
  7. Think I will pass on the F15 and S-27, shame as I was looking forward to them, but I think I will wait for a High Fidelity fighter, be it made by ED or someone else.
  8. A decent Gulf map would be great, as would Korea.
  9. Its been 3 years so far I believe and quite frankly I would make a suggestion, but by the time it comes out I will be too old and senile to remember what I suggested.
  10. Will the F15C be the updated model with the newer radar APG-63(V)2 ?
  11. From the newsletter it seems that the f-15C is going to probably be the next DCS Aircraft, which interestingly is the aircraft that came last in the Wishlist vote. :noexpression:
  12. From what I understand, they cant model the Longbow as its radar is still highly classified and they wont model systems that they cant replicate to a very high degree of fidelity (admirable, but frustrating) To be honest, the lack of any real info at all regarding the next offical aircraft is getting a bit old to be honest, but ho hum it is what it is and all that.
  13. Right, i seem to have lost thread somehwere between all the tooing and froing between Weta and Alfa. Can someone clarify what version of the SU27 ED will be modelling?????
  14. Rough Timeframes would be nice. All the thrid party add ons with a couple of exceptions are going to be 1-2 years off probably, hoping that the next offical ED DCS plane turns up sometime soon, and I just hope that they are not prioritising the FW190 and CA development over the next Jet. Of course its up to them, its their business, its just my personal feelings.
  15. Which is a fair comment. Although I personally would appreciate more realism in systems etc, I do realise that this will take a bit of time to get there. This does look like a good starting point though.
×
×
  • Create New...