Jump to content

Murey2

Members
  • Posts

    282
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS
  • Location
    Mother Earth
  • Interests
    Gaming, science, Movies, Religion, History and Army.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Not really, the RADAR in the game is broken it can lock on stuff from behind buildings!! even the heatseekers samething! Is it real no it's NOT! So asking for stuff to be simulated like Shkval contrast lock and RADAR simulating will fix a lot in the game. and the people complaining about performance should buy new machines...
  2. Well said Fri13, It's crazy how those people complain about the Ka-50 that it was a trail/test frame, this exact fact should make them shut it up. for the following simple facts: Ka-50 as a trail/ test frame that means they have experimented with it! So, did the experiment stuff that there is no way for it to carry and shoot or stuff within it parameters?! The answer is obvious! So the silly theory from the silly people talking about laser guns on the Ka-50 is really dumb. And now the USSR/Russian MoD has finished the testing on the Ka-50 and it went to production and canceled later for financial reasons. but they had more faith in the 2 crew variant of the Ka-50 which is called Ka-52! So what did the Ka-52 get?! every thing that was tested on the Ka-50 like AA-weapons, RWR, DIRCM, thermal sensors. And then the Ka-52 got more like Elector-optical RADAR! So for any smart individual, the seller the USSR/Russian MoD and it's agencies can deliver what they say/claim about their products, obviously YES THEY CAN AND THEY DID... AKA KA-52... If the Ka-52 was lacking in features then I would believe that the Ka-50 experiment was a failure which is obviously is not the case! Also the FACT that we have something called Ka-52 that is still in production and in service says a lot of the success of the Ka-50. That would have not been the case if nothing at all came to exist from Kamov and what happened later is that the Russian MoD opted for Mi-28 only and the Kamov attack helicopters were put to death which is not the damn case again!!!!!!
  3. All I'm getting from all those people wanting the Ka-50 to remain as dumb as it was, is just out of fear of it getting it's full potentials and dominate the battle fields and the skies. For me I know for sure if a new customer for the Ka-50 emerge out of the blue and wants it to be latest on tech it will be super scary. I understand your fear, but your time of easy target practice on the poor Ka-50 is over.
  4. I knew that you are Starwars trolls, I have to tell you this is not the case.
  5. YES it did! You guys need to just invest some quality time in reading... LOL
  6. It will be a big shame if the new BS3 is not fitted with the 6 pylon wings because the most outer pylons/stations should be dedicated for Iglas and the weight of such system can be handled with the helicopter And the most important as Fri13 has proven super clearly that the weapon station select hat in the collective is designed in a way for 6 pylons not only 4!
  7. Dude all of what you mentioned is per though of in military they have Standards Systems and Regulations governing all of that. So we know it carry it we have photos of that and if it carry it for such system like Igla it's for sure can launch it. If you have evidence against that please post them here.
  8. That thing above is completely different story and not to be compared to Igla what so ever! because Iglas are carried and launched as man portable deceives called MANPAD!!!! So Iglas seen carried and next to Ka-50 and obviously if a man can launch it from his shoulder an Attack Helicopter can launch it let's compare apples to apples (we are still talking Iglas here!).
  9. 100% agreed I'm on the edge of scraping my system and leave simming for good. I really hope ED to start to rework on the Ka-50 systems as they did for the A-10!
  10. As clearly seen above those 2 missiles are AA Iglas... in case those who ask for evidence didn't see!
  11. Epic job man you have nail it. even if people still deny it's because there are people in this life that even if they see the unseeable they will say that they lost their brain!!! so the issue at hand is brain capacity! ED you better give us something worth waiting for after all the years... I want RWR suite Non-negotiable! Don't mind if it's part of the DIRCM suite.
  12. Go read the title of this topic and research it.
  13. the poor reality of what we're getting as BS3 and what I was expecting.... Or this
  14. OMG man. It drives me so mad. I think ED never plays the shark if they did and were as honest as they claim they would have fix it just for the simple fact that if they fly for more that 2 F... hours to be killed by a flying target because the God damn lock doesn't F... work! They would have fixed it long freaking time ago.
  15. Exactly 100% Even if they went on simulating only few variables it will still way better than the fakes that run stupid chances calculates that smart people get used to. If you ask me I will always choose realism and not game-play. It's sad how people lie to themselves when they call it simulator and if we ask how much of the game is simulated and not faked I guess it will be less than 10%... the fakery in DCS make feel as if we are still living in the 90s. It's really sad we deserve better and it's 2020!!!!.
×
×
  • Create New...