Jump to content

USA_Recon

Members
  • Posts

    587
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by USA_Recon

  1. I have same question, it’s nearly unreadable
  2. Hi Mike, Our group focus is A2A focus with the air superiority C model. Typically flown in 80s scenario. IFF, MQT, 2FLUG/4FLUG training from qualified IP pilots. We have the E and can use it for training purposes but it’s not our primary ride hope that helps.
  3. Please DM if interested. Private small group focused on the F-15C . Looking for one possibility two pilots. NA pilots only
  4. I installed Ultraleap software and then went to start DCS and it won't load in VR - any ideas ?
  5. Same thing, after installing the ultraleap software from leap site, when I start DCS in my Crystal it won't goto VR , even if I try to force it. I had to uninstall ultraleap. So not working all ??? I just bought this hand tracking for DCS - bad timing since 2.9 breaks it ?
  6. We are seeing inconsistency where in STT the Aim 7 won't track. Seems the MH does track but M having some inconsistency of not tracking Could be related to other semi-active as well. I've seen some AI fire and see ER not track
  7. we could use some presets for FC3 aircraft
  8. This week I was given access to a new beta firmware that features the 72Hz for the Crystal. In combination with eye tracking using DFR, I was getting 80-90 fps with my i7 13700 with 4090. As everyone knows though, especially in DCS multiplayer it’s nearly impossible to maintain 90fps, and the result can mean ghosting effects etc . With 72Hz, I can definitely maintain > 70 fps and the result is buttery smoothness! I noticed no side effects at all. Rolling toward the ground tracking a bandit made it easier to follow, etc . As a side note I tried warbirds as well, and saw no visuals issues. Basically already running at 35 PPD, DFR and 72Hz provides a great experience for DCS - really looking forward to everyone getting this soon! I also think this will really help folks with lower system specs. I went from a G2 to a Crystal and it’s like going from a 3rd gen to a 5th gen fighter, a headset perfect for DCS VR simmers!
  9. I have this issue, often times it has to do with press vs short press. One patch awhile back broke it .
  10. Two suggestions. 1. If you fly straight at bandit and don’t offset they will typically go one circle. Create offset (put bandit outside canopy bow). Try to get a lead turn through the bandits control zone. Offsetting keeps you out of a WEZ. Slightly be higher or lower to avoid head on gun shots. 2. You can also merge, watch and wait to see the direction bandit turns and simply go opposite to setup the 2 circle. Control the fight don’t just be reactionary . Don’t just blindly turn a certain way assuming that will be a two circle speed is relative to bandit, use speed as a guide not as a robot. Angles, aspect, closure is more important to understand
  11. I think ED now makes clean canopy not ic compliant, so stuck with very unrealistic canopy reflections
  12. Didn’t realize 300/600 missile unlock. I assume this is what nearly all other dcs jets call cage/uncage ? Wish Aerges worked on I,proving their naming for bindings . Super confusing
  13. I read the guide and it doesn’t have a nice breakdown at all ??? thanks to other here for actually answering the question Awesome thanks ! also, the Matra tones are deafening, does F1 have a way to turn that down ie like F-5 ?
  14. No explanation of cannon600 nothing even in chucks guide. Care to elaborate on this poorly named binding ? obscure binding names makes it hard to use your module
  15. Looking to learn the differences of the missile types on the F1, is there a good summary anywhere ?
  16. I followed a bandit all over and couldn’t get the tone, tried everywhere including the top of the glass
  17. Eye tracking from Pimax should be out in September. It's currently being heavily beta tested and making fantastic progress
  18. I hope they revamp that entire experience. Jester needs to do most this work, he just don't know the context (ie. 2 ship targeting) - so for me, let the pilot just confirm vs. do all the work. So yes, I agree, the micro management needs to greatly decline. We want a professional in the back seat, not an arm chair DCS wanna be Otherwise, just let me control the radar like the lantirn pod... And PLEASE include and help the VIACOM devs - voice is SOOOOO much better than a wheel.
  19. I think some of the issue is ED doesn't really provide any guidance, they just push out code with parameters. For example... it appears in my experience that although you have a data link contact, and you know the altitude - the first thing everyone says is "you didn't set your elevation correct" sound about right ? What is being missed is alllllll kinda of other factors: is bandit cold, is bandit notching, is bandit low ? How does ED compute doppler effect. ? We don't know unfortunately, they don't share. They just assume dumb pilots and then... is bandit jamming ? Lately the jamming is outrageously modeled, one mod even said 'it's way over done and will be fixed' - but we as commoners of DCS aren't supplied that - we just experience crappy performance and come to these forum posts and are told 'you must not be setting the altitude correctly. Couple of things them... PRF does matter, but it doesn't solve everything. Bandits notching or low, or even semi notching can often be 'unlockable'. Factor all that in - and until ED shares some information - like RB devs tend to share things around this - but ED doesn't for whatever reason - then we are all left wondering 'is this on purpose or is it broken' Good luck!
  20. Because it tends to be supported by other defenses
  21. I locked a jammed target in tws and pressing auto acq press returns me to search but my radar was stuck in faster with no captain bars. I could switch to acm or tws again (without elevation bars) but couldn’t get back to RTS
  22. It would be a dream come true for a high fidelity F-15A/C - but everyone says that ED will only do multi role (and helicopters it seems) I think something like a F-15A would fit really well into DCS . Since ED appears not interested maybe a 3rd party dev would do it . That all said … Removing the CFTs would be an easier concept than building an entirely new aircraft. I know people that will freak out about it - but it has been tried irl . https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/f-15e-strike-eagles-now-flying-without-conformal-fuel-tanks-on-air-defense-missions “Some F-15E Strike Eagles have ditched their conformal fuel tanks as they take on more air-to-air missions in the absence of the F-15C.” Makes for a good headline for DCS eh ? I know it means RB has to create a separate FM but this would be easier than an entirely new aircraft.
  23. Was testing a group of bandits close together hot on the radar 25k / 50 miles and in. eventually got 3 tracks at around 40-50 miles. Was able to lock (soft or in tws) an element - eventually could get 2 or them but the group with a elevation difference - unable to separate (same distance - one dropped to 20k the other at like 25k )
×
×
  • Create New...