Jump to content

Boberro

Members
  • Posts

    6362
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by Boberro

  1. Hey I have no sound at all in Open Beta. Here is the log:

     

    2022-03-18 11:03:46.349 INFO    SOUND: Opening audio device "{0.0.0.00000000}.{8cdc2d5a-5aa9-4694-9320-5ab286456026}"
    2022-03-18 11:03:46.349 INFO    SOUND: Speaker layout: auto
    2022-03-18 11:03:46.354 INFO    SOUND: Driver reports 8 channels with mask 0x63F
    2022-03-18 11:03:46.354 INFO    SOUND: Using 8 channels at 48000 Hz
    2022-03-18 11:03:46.354 INFO    SOUND: Channel layout:  FrontLeft FrontRight FrontCenter LowFrequency BackLeft BackRight SideLeft SideRight
    2022-03-18 11:03:46.372 ERROR   SOUND: Failed to Initialize IAudioClient: 0x88890008 (AUDCLNT_E_UNSUPPORTED_FORMAT)
    2022-03-18 11:03:46.372 ERROR   SOUND: Failed to start SND_Renderer.
    2022-03-18 11:03:46.372 ERROR   SOUND: can't start renderer

     

    In stable I used autoexec hack:

    sound.samplerate = 44100

    But it does not fix Open Beta...

     

     

  2. There's literally tons of valid evidence and admission unidentified objects are flying around defying our know capabilitys. Be careful with ultra clear footage, tech can be a double edge sword (cgi). And our 4k phones are actually not good at distance or at night but people upload footage all the time. Its there, got to research it.

     

    Let me ask you, when the US government says yep here's some footage of ufos and says yep we research ufos and pilots say yep I saw that ufo and radar techs say yep we tracked that ufo. LOL what more do you want? Never mind all the other mountain of evidence. Put ur head back in the sand if u want.

    Valid evidence? Maybe in your eyes. If you are more willing to believe in UFO then even a blinking star will be a sign for you.

    I support my claim - there is no any real evidence of UFO presence on Earth. There is no any clear footage done by good camera.

    I can easily say that any UFO seeing is just a projection done by the Satan. I have no proof for that as you have no proof to support your story.

    It is just a belief you follow. Nothing more, nothing less.

     

     

    When there is a valid material in good quality then I may reconsider my statement. But for now UFO understood as advanced alien civilization does not exist on Earth, does not come to visit and say "hello".

     

     

  3. Two different things. One is like talking about the existence of a fart in the wind and the other is a real are physical objects as real as the planes that fly above your head (and sometime they are planes). Like I said before the question of if UFOs are flying around is not up for debate anymore.

    For me it is still up to debate. Why? There is no any valid evidence of the UFO presence. We live in the world of 4K cameras in the phones. Quite good quality cams are also very much present on the streets. The people take 4K_60_HDR while they take a dump.

    Meanwhile there is no any good quality recording of the UFO :) Weirdly they choose to invade Earth only when in the neighbourhood are people equipped with 20 years old phones :D

     

     

    I'm not talking about the low grain video. I'm talking about the F16 locked on tracks as presented by the Chief of Air Force; I'm talking about the Naval aviators with FLIR image that tracked impossible (as we know it) aircraft; I'm talking about the NORAD and surrounding AF ATC talking about the impossible speeds being tracked. People can choose to believe that there is a global agreement to produce fakery, or that they really do exist. It's up to the person to decide.

     

    As for the shaky video, most people will immediately zoom trying to get a better view. Back then, the technology sucked w/o image stabilization, and today, it will still suck because it's not an optical zoom, but a digital one.

     

    Finally, scientific principles and the belief in omniscient & omnipotent God is orthogonal. In scientific experiment, you need a control and a variable. That *is* the scientific principle. But if such a god exists, you can never have a control where there is no god. But if such a god does not exist, you can't create the variable where God does not exist.

    The radars and other detection systems can be misleading. In the Cold War clouds made long range fire detection system stupid and showed to the Russians that Americans began a war.

    When we take the God in consideration, I could also say that such UFO is only a projection done by the Satan to make people follow something which is not important. Do I have a proof? Nope. Do you have valid proof for your claims? Nope.

    The belief stays - for the both of the sides.

  4. Boberro, Ufologists can only afford a 35 year old VHS recorder because they spend all their time solving mysteries and dodging MiBs instead of working. Likewise, the shakey cameras are from years in hiding in relatives' basements without access to gym equipment causing muscular atrophy!

    I guess you may be right :D

     

     

    It is true that we human beings cannot ascertain the existence of aliens until we have certain proofs. but on this subject the big powers are silent or try to denigrate news that could bring the truth. our governments know it is rumored that a small amount of human beings made up of powerful and important people of this land, including the pope who represents the church, have annual meetings with these alien races.

    The what? Who rumours that example the pope has an contact with aliens?

    I think our humanity has committed the more serious crime than our existence to hide from the human truth the truth and to maintain a kind of secret secondary government that this truth knows well. It is a CRIME and a real CRIMES and worse to change history and worse to do a 3 world war and a SHAME thing.

    The question is, how can you show something which has not been proven and exist only in the minds of the believers?

     

     

     

     

    Yes, it has Not been proven that ET's exist. And yes Usually the evidence is not great but its that small % that still makes up a ton of compelling and profound evidence. Once you start to look at this subject with a carful eye and some honest time you will find it has been documented well and ad nauseam.

     

    You will come to the realization that there are craft that are flying around and are easily performing outside the envelope of anything in Any country's inventory and have been doing so for many many decades if not more. It's not something that comes quick and you must dedicate time to prove it to yourself, its not for everyone, its too much for most and or not interesting enough, to me idk what could be more interesting, but anyway. You will start to realize that there are not many terrestrial options that fit well in explaining this phenomenon entirely although many try with ideas such as breakaway civilizations, but that gets deep.

    That is called a belief. I can also say that if you watch carefully by your eye, spend honest time to think about then you will see the Biblical God. Will you?

     

    No you will not see him. You will believe in him and his presence. But that stays only in your head.

     

     

    There are problems with what is written in the book of Genesis because when God created the Universe it took an extremely long time in the realm of 100 Trillion years. In that time things were not as most people are led to believe. God was first created by accident involving a collision in another dimension and was trapped in that situation with only vacuum and asteroids to deal with. Other life forms have been created by a similar process but they did not have a fragment of gravity element inside them with which to move in zero gravity in soul form in vacuum and create something from gravity and wormhole element.

    The process of creation began with God making a sphere then later placing gravity element inside a spheres shell which created a gravity field on a planet and could be filled with air. The early planets featured no planet rotation and no moon and had to be heated by a furnace. The first star was created to replace the furnace but its impact on the planet caused God, Mary, Jesus and the Angels underground. It heated the ground rapidly and so God attempted to cool it with water. This led to a very high temperature on the surface, water turned to steam, turned to cloud and produced a violent wind of 4000 MPH.

    God's next planet rotated in order to distribute heat and it was found that gravity could slow the wind speed to a survivable level. The first moon rotated and allowed the planet to be liveable for God, Mary, Jesus and the Angels of the Gabriel Batch. So trial and error with catastrophe is the best way to describe how things shaped for Heaven and the Universe, regarding Earths moon, God forgot to add some crystals to produce moon rotation which is why it does not rotate.

    I don't know what kind of drug you have taken but I want this stuff too :D

     

    syays

  5. It's math. If it's pure chance that primordial soup and mutations caused life to begin. And if it's pure chance that something delivered the necessary molecules to make earth, than the more opportunities you have (the billions of stars in billions of galaxies) means it'll happen more than once.

     

    If you believe in the Genesis theory, then clearly an omnipotent God can create as many lifeforms as he sees fit.

    It is a chance, yes. But a chance is not smth valuable in this aspect - we ca't measure the chance to say that there are out there other smart life forms. There is only a belief - one believes that there has to be something there because it is not possible to have so enormous space with only the human race. Can the one's prove it? Nope.

    The other one believes that there is no chance to be other smart life form. There is no way to deny either of the both beliefs.

    You don't have to believe in the Genesis to be sceptical about other life forms (understood as smth more than a bacteria) in a space.

     

     

    Holding is not the only way to prove. UFO's have been proven to be true and are fact, they are real and its not up for debate anymore. Unidentified Flying Object. It is something the government spends many millions if not more (admittedly) studying and they have released proof. They have been observed by countless credible individuals, videoed, recorded, tracked on radar, and photographed. Its exhausting, the amount of proof. The F-117 was a UFO for a while and at that time wasn't to be held by the scientific community or the public but guess what.. it exists doesn't it. So that is proof right there UFOs exist IT was a U F O (for a period of time)(UFOs exist).

     

     

     

    Now If you want to have a debate on if they are ours or theirs that's a different story, but please be realistic and do the research. :)

     

     

    PS. that was a real :) and not one of those A-Hole :) faces

    UFO understood as alien developed life form has not been proved, so remains as unknown. There is no any bullet proof evidence that Earth has been visited by the aliens, there is no scientific proof of anything that happened, ever.

     

    Everything like we have today is just an belief - you can believe that the lights on the sky moving fast were the example of UFO. But it is only your belief, based usually on low quality video, recorded by someone with the Parkinson disease :D

  6. The probability of existing UFO understood as intelligent life form is as possible as denying it.

    Nobody can prove anything in this moment. Saying that there are billions of planets, galaxies and there has to be somebody else is also very stupid, I would say on the same level as saying - no, we are completely alone.

    In either case, it is only a faith - either you believe there are aliens or not. The science can prove nothing in this case.

     

     

  7. You can use a triggered action to remove scenery objects

     

    -> Set up a trigger zone (make it very large)

     

    -> In the 'set rules for trigger' menu (the one below the clouds) set it as the following:

     

    Under 'triggers' select new -> 4 Mission Start

     

    Leave 'conditions' blank

     

    Under 'actions' hit new, and select 'Scenery Remove Objects Zone' set the 'zone' to the trigger zone you made and 'select objects mask' to trees only, objects only or both depending on what you want to achieve.

     

    And that's it, all the scenery objects (buildings, trucks, boats, trees, depending on what you select etc).

     

    Let me know if you run into trouble.

     

     

    Wow, as I cannot test it now, does it free used RAM for scenery objects and increase FPS or they are still in memory but just not visible for player?

  8. the idea was to show some gender solidarity and equality. As you point out, gender bigotry is unfortunate reality of this community.

     

    But there are so many idle little men, who have nothing constructive do add, so they must have their little display of "manhood" in each and every thread.

    You are partially right and wrong same time.

     

     

    20-30 years ago and earlier there were only two genders. Male and female. And everyone was assigned to be one of these two. Today you can say you feel that you are a horse so you are horse gender - in big simplicity.

    Everyone who disagrees or is against is being called homophobe. He must accept deviations like that, otherwise he can be banned or stoned because he hurt feelings of the a man who think he is a horse.

     

    We live in really weird times, where it is forbidden to say that one ethnic group is majority in prisons because then you are racist. Even if you post real data regarding this matter.

     

    If you are against gender parities in company, where there has to be at least 1 woman as chairman then you are idiot, crazy man ect.

    In the same time when those people scream at you "idiot", "homophobe", "racist" they can't give a thought that not everything must be as they wish and maybe they're wrong.

    Not every must fit everywhere, pilots are in 99% men. Should be there women in DCS? I don't care as long as it doesn't touches nowadays stupidity that women have to prove that they are better than man. In some they are better, in some they are completely useless and that is a fact.:)

  9. Do you guys reckon they will give the MI-24P the capability to take R-60/M missiles? It seems as if it could equip them, though I guess it wasn't a common practise since theres not all that many images out there showing off the A2A capacity of the helo. Might make a good tradeoff, Two R-60M missiles at the expense of 4 Shturm or rocket pods.

     

     

    R-60 can't kill a mosquito, not saying about common fly, so compared to Shturms it is a quite a loss.

    If you would have been lucky, you could kill a fighter by Shturm. There were engagements in DCS World, where p00r F-15C was killed by Vikhr fired by Ka-50.

    Not saying about dozen of even more pooooor A-10C which died.

     

     

    But so far I know nobody who died, being killed by R-60.

  10. Well to be honest, sometimes it was visible that company comes from Russia, so people there had still in mind "soviet style" of communication, ekhm quite strict, raw and with sometimes low rude attitude. They were born, lived around this.

     

    But in XXI century in globalized world communication is important, and its change here is visible. The change is for plus of course.

  11. Instead of requesting over and over X terrain, it would be better to finally get terrain development tools as promised 10 years ago.

     

    But nooooooo............, it is better to release one map for 5 years and keep tools for myself lol.

×
×
  • Create New...