Beqanyc

You are awesome! that was only thing i have not changed. Thank you!

Dear friends , Can you please tell me how to get rid of mission restart on Shift + R . i removed it from all the modules and configs , but i still cant get rid of it. Thank you for your help.

Believe it or not man, things do just happen, today's aircraft have thousands of different systems inside and some of them do just fail, even without battle damage. But i do agree with you that human negligence can be the high course of problems. However, as far as we know, AV-8B does not have the backup hydraulic systems in case of engine failure, there is not much we can do about it :)

:lol: i like your comment! but unfortunate things happen , there are many instances where both commercial and military planes run out of fuel, sometimes mechanical failure, ground crew mistake , or just pilots like me who do not pay attention to fuel gauges :) Thank you! that is interesting! As far as i also learned after many hours of googling, AV8B just does not have any backup for engine failure. The developers did an amazing job on this module , it would be interesting to hear their insight on this matter. Very good point , lets just say the plane is not in the enemy territory but on routine training exercise and just looses its engine. the concern is that you are loosing the flight hydraulics, which leaves you only option to eject and lose the aircraft.

I tried to search for the manuals :) , i found couple, unfortunate could not find the information i was looking for, I agree with you , in most aircraft the battery takes over the basic flight controls in case of engine power loss , or RAT . its kind of hard to believe that 30 million dollar aircraft has no backup system in this type of scenario. it would be interesting to know if this aircraft has some sort of backup hydraulic system in case of engine power loss.

Hello everyone, Do you guys know any procedures on how to control the aicraft (AV-8B) when it is out of fuel? Does it have any emergency systems ? like RAT (Ram air turbine) or any other system used during the engine power loss. any help is greatly appreciated.

You've been very helpful thank you! :beer:

Thank you! I just placed an order for 8gb more RAM so I should have 16gb soon. Can you suggest me how to configure this simulator in settings? For example which stetting's should be on high or medium for the game to run smoothly. or if you want put the screenshot of your settings, would be absolutely great. Thanks again for your response!

Hey guys, I recently noticed that when I create mission with 4 or 8 medium groups (several tanks and trucks ) (2 squads of helicopter or attack aircraft) active on a map I get a very bad performance hit on my system when they are active (moving around shooting each other). When units are static , I can have an entire map populated and I will not get any performance hit. I understand that the active units require CPU processing but it was never that bad. Now when I'm flying towards active units or even move camera to look at the units or around them it reacts as if my mouse laser had the water on it and was sliding (exact description) it lags , when I look other direction in game in returns to normal. These are my system specs: Windows 10 SSD 512 (Game is installed) GTX 980 NVidia i7-4770K 8 GB Kingston HyperX RAM Please , any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Definitely , it might be successful. But as cichlidfan mentioned that he thinks it would not be faster or easier to create module like F-15. if more people conform the accuracy of his thought , than its definitely not worth it to create non- clickable modules. I agree , the idea of having some control in cockpit is good , I know the frustration with A-10A :smilewink:

Please don't misunderstand me , I'm not saying that creating PFM is an easy work. ( I don't know all the teams so I will write the simplest way I can) . Theoretically speaking, wouldn't it be much easier and faster to crate su-25 like module, rather then A-10C ? Agreed ;) maybe some transporter aircraft like Il-76 or C-130

Thanks for your replies guys ;) and let me clarify a little bit what I meant to say. I definitely want to see more realistic cockpits and flight models, like Mig 21 and A10. I love DCS world for its realism , I really don't want to see it dumbed down!, and I'm also not saying to stop or slow down the development of any DCS level module. I cant wait to see F18 Hornet... :D All I'm saying is that, maybe third party's or even Eagle Dynamics , can add some workable cockpits to existing aircraft models in dcs world, or even create some modules like SU-25 quality, which does not require year or two to develop, and give it a LOW price. And later maybe upgrade it to DCS level module , with fully functional cockpit.

Me too :) , I mean, making non clickable parallel to other models.

Greetings everyone, I'm playing DCS world almost everyday, and this question is bugging me for some time now , Why no one is working on creating Non-clickable cockpits for other aircraft in DCS world , similar to Su-25 , Su- 27 , F-15 ? There are several amazing models in game without cockpit , like Mig 31 , tu 22 backfire , Tornado. I really enjoy playing A10 and Mig 21 , but sometimes I'm getting tired of clicking so many buttons to fly aircraft :lol: and I'm switching on Su-27 or f 15 , witch I enjoy a lot. I don't understand much on creating games, but I think that creating a module like Mig 21 or A10, takes a lot of time and effort , in comparison to a model like Su-25. I would defiantly pay several bucks for an decently modeled aircraft with non clickable cockpit. So what do you guys think?

Dear people , I need some advice, I want to make Mig 31 flyable , using Su 27 cockpit. I just want to know if its possible , and if it is possible how to do it (instructions) . Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! My version of DCS World is 1.2.7 and it is on Steam. I have All modules , including flaming cliffs 3. Mig 31 Foxhound