Jump to content

SatThuVoBui

Members
  • Posts

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hello. I just got back from my vacation. So first thing I tried was deleting my entire saved games folder then running DCS, and it crashed so hard that windows crashed. Then I tried upping my pagefile size to 32gb as you recommended, and I was able to play for an hour hosting a private MP server with a friend. I monitored my CPU temps and it didn't go above 75c, and interestingly I saw DCS was using 22.5gb of RAM...I think that might've been the culprit. Because if DCS was using 22.5gb of RAM, and hypothetically if windows or some other background process was using up the other 9.5gb on my system, that could cause the systemwide crash.
  2. Gotcha. I'll report in a week then. I'll be away from my computer until.
  3. I copied my dcs.openbeta folder, but not the entire saved games folder.
  4. I upgraded recently to a new rig and I'm experiencing CTDs frequently flying in a private server with a friend. Compared to my old machine, I'm noticing more frequent crashes. Old System specs: i7-6700K 32GB DDR4-3000 GTX 1080 Ti New System specs: Ryzen 9 7900X 32GB DDR5-6000 RX 7900XTX dcs.log-20230512-061828.zip dcs.log-20230512-052447.zip
  5. Is there anybody still running this game on a quad core CPU like a 7700K or before? I'm on a 6700K and while it's nice reading hype about huge performance boosts from plenty of other users (good job ED!) I still feel like I need to temper my expectations to maybe about slightly less than half of the median reported performance boost most other users are reporting. I'm also on 32gb of RAM with a 1080 Ti so up until this point CPU has always been the bottleneck.
  6. Hello Mike. Just thought I'd let you know it's not specific to the AIM-7s. I was able to reproduce this bug simply by removing the 3 and 6 pylons then attempting to rearm right after. Simply put the pylons don't re-equip after you remove them symmetrically on the center fuselage pylons for any reason, whether that be from you equipping sparrows or from removing all pylons. This is July 3rd version 2.7.15
  7. I tried the instant action missions for the MiG-21 and dropped down to a whopping 12 fps in free flight and PRMG approach. You read that right. T W E L V E fps with a GTX 1080 Ti :megalol::megalol::megalol:
  8. If this paid update is an upgrade of our Ka-50 from its prototype model into a Ka-50N variant or better, then I'm guaranteed to buy it. Night attack black shark or Ka-50sh with the full glass cockpit would be absolutely amazing.
  9. But if the changes are extensive enough to warrant a charge, wouldn't it follow that our Ka-50 is being upgraded to a higher variant? What I'm hoping is that the changes aren't an inclusion of features and aspects of the Black shark that should've been present from the beginning according to its model.
  10. I suppose the only question I would like answered which would justify the cost or not in my opinion is what this avionics upgrade constitutes exactly. When I paid for the Ka-50, I was expecting a simulation of a particular airframe in a particular era that includes all features and capabilities associated with its real-life counterpart, and the highest level of realism possibly attainable, as that was how it was marketed. I therefore don't feel like I should have to pay for features which should've been present from the very beginning. IF however, this upgrade corresponds to an update in the avionics package in real life, such as overhauling our Ka-50 from a 2000s prototype model to a 2010s era production model, then I will be *more than* happy to financially compensate ED for the update. Basically, my opinion is that a paid avionics upgrade should correlate to a change in block or lot - such as upgrading an F-16 from a block 30 to a block 50.
  11. Will these optimizations have any beneficial effects for players still playing on monitors?
  12. I bought the L-39 because the ZA model is in service with the Syrian Arab Air Force. Just because an aircraft is labeled "trainer" does not mean you cannot simulate combat with it.
  13. Except that's not how that works. The more powerful a radar the less susceptible it is to electronic warfare by definition. The EW suite installed on a HARM would have minimal, if any, effect on any of the S-300's radars and the missile could be engaged at its launch point if need be. The EW package on board the HARM is for self defense purposes and has the effect of decreasing the range at which a SAM with a weak radar could engage it. It would be effective against maybe an Osa radar, but nothing much else. HARMs aren't particularly effective against S-300s, Tors, or BUKs in general. Real life strategy is to swarm them with cruise missiles, decoys, and JASSMs...completely different weapons systems.
  14. I'm actually curious as to what that one step would be? Venturing to take a guess, is it uploading the DTS chip data onto the plane?
  15. VKB Fat Black Mamba Mk. III + TMW Grip, TMW control throttle, Saitek pro flight combat rudder pedals
×
×
  • Create New...