Jump to content

FlankerKiller

Members
  • Posts

    959
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    Current: DCS.
    Past: CFS2, FSX, IL2, Wings over Vietnam, LOMAC.
  • Location
    United States
  • Interests
    Fire Arms enthusiast, and sometimes competitive shooter, mounted archer, SCUBA diver, kayaker.
  • Occupation
    Aircraft Electrician.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Same, they should be about equal before the merge. Really in that era, the 80s, it was all about pointing and shooting after the merge. The 29 will dominate that. But an MLA could get lucky. IRL there were more 23s than 29s especially early on. So that’s a factor too. I like military aircraft. The 23 should stack up well against the F-4, and F-5. Against the Cat it’s going to be tough. But tough can be fun.
  2. I’m going for both. The 23 covers a ten year gap before the 29. And would still have been the backbone in the 80s. If missions or campaigns are designed properly the 21, 23, 29 will all work together. I love the Soviet stuff, and this jet is classic Soviet.
  3. Without dropping tech data doses anyone have any information on the radar performance on this jet. What are the detection ranges, azimuth limits, look down capabilities like. I asked the same question about the 29 and got a great answer. I’m really looking forward to this bird. It’ll be the backbone of any seventies mission, and still be a major player in the 80’s. My understanding is with this MiG you really want to with the BVR fight. I’m curious how much of a tool the radar will be to that end.
  4. I can’t say it’s the most exciting thing to me. I think the A-7E gets that prize. But I’m certainly with you in being excited about it. We are about to have the whole MiG lineup in DCS. That’s going to be awesome. I can’t wait to see the late Cold War go hot.
  5. Thanks. I’m not really doing anything with the FC3 version. I might dust it off to practice flying it but that’s about it. High and fast vs a Tomcat seems to be suicidal. So basically it’s live to the merge point and shoot.
  6. I’m interested to see what the radar module on this bird looks like. Without dropping tech data dose anyone have detection ranges on things like say an F-14? How dose it do looking into the ground? What are to azmith limits? Basically if GCI puts me nose to nose against anything with a F model sparrow how even will the fight be? I know we have FC3 to look at, but I suspect the FF radar to be more detailed.
  7. Try getting good? Sorry I had to. BVR it will suck compared to the AMRAAM slinging crowd. It isn’t FWB, and if you’re not used to that then that could be biting you too. In a dogfight it should be a match for anything, and an overmatch for most things. But you have to manage the energy. I’m not sure of every tactic, but there should be a fight you can fight and win against any other jet once merged.
  8. I would suspect so. GCI for situational awareness was the Soviet way after all. That would be a cool system to have in the game. It would really bring home the “full fidelity” feeling.
  9. Ours is from 1987 same as the B model Tomcat. The Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. The RDI could definitely have see action, granted in limited numbers. As far as FM ours M2000 is nowhere even close to an F-22. I suspect in the right hands this MiG would beat it. off topic but I don’t see the hate for the M2000C. It’s like a F-16A. A lightweight FWB fighter. It was, and would be expected to be a monster in a dogfight. But as for UFO do some low speed climbs with a clean jet. Both the Viper and the true UFO F-18 crush it.
  10. That’s the odd thing about this module. It’s kinda already out in an alpha state. We can already play with it and get used to it. it’s certainly a pilots aircraft. It isn’t fly by wire, and will bite you in a hurry. I think the Tomcat crowd will love it. After full fidelity I just can’t do the FC3 jets anymore. Having my second favorite jet from LOMAC in full fidelity is going to be sweet.
  11. Speak for yourself. I spent years loving this bird in LOMAC and flaming cliffs. But once I got used to full fidelity i just couldn’t go back. Being able to actually interact with the jet is going to be awesome. If it has more realistic capabilities if FF then LOMAC then so be it. I for one am beyond stoked to get to know this bird all over again. Plus it’s such a cool jet. One of the last pure dog fighters. It’s going to be able to go toe to toe with the M2000C but with no FBW. Maybe they will figure out roadside bases for us to fly from.
  12. I’ve had the pilots killed, the copilot killled, the gunners killed, engine fires, and hydro losses in the Huey. Its damage model is simple. But it isn’t that simple.
  13. The C-101EB basically has a check ride simulated in one of its training missions. As stated above it shows that training and evaluation is possible.
  14. Please, I use the mobile TACAN all the time. A mobile RSBN would be great. According to Wings of The Red Star this thing was supposed to provide air superiority over a battlefield. I can see that if backed up by good GCI. Having mobile RSBN to fly too would be sweet.
×
×
  • Create New...