-
Posts
1211 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by rkk01
-
-
But not everyone is an online PvP player
A8 vs AI is frustrating/ pointless
-
On 2/25/2024 at 11:54 AM, Bremspropeller said:
I hear you.
But let's just play devil's advocate for a second: There's a pretty nice looking GR.3 in the pictures there, too. No sekrit radar and stuff. I'd take a GR.3 before no season-correct Harrier at all.
Was Atlantic Conveyor planned to be in the assets pack? I'd like it to convey my AV-8B to places, that's why I'm asking.
Yes I do know, the real one is in a "slightly used" condition...
Atlantic Conveyor is well known due to her loss, but sister ship Atlantic Causeway also went South
IIRC, my father worked on the preparation / hasty fit out of Causeway (not sure about Conveyor), Rangatira and Contender Bezant - subsequently RFA Argus
- 1
-
I thought the old Hawk wasn’t compatible with the recent versions of DCS…?
presumably that just for player flown aircraft??
-
-
3 hours ago, OzDeaDMeaT said:
Is this a bug or a Wishlist request?
Both, I guess…
I posted in the S Atlantic sub-forum, asking whether the were any ME settings to get AI strike packages to keep a set height above terrain
The Argentine pilots showed considerable skill and bravery in pressing home their attacks during the Falklands Conflict, but I was finding it hard to replicate their ultra low level and terrain following flight profiles…
Same applies across many other areas of DCS - helos, Viggen, Mossie - tell the AI to fly at 10-20m AGL and expect them to get on with it
-
Try flying close to the Chase as an opfor….
(I tried to use it as a merchant type stand in for a Victory ship - did I get an unpleasant surprise )
- 2
-
I was surprised to read about Spit pilots getting caught out by Zeros….
Would have to check which models - but presumably Vcs over Darwin?
I also think the match ups with the 109 and both 190s will be fascinating
I’ve posted before though - would be great to have an Illustrious class carrier (and a Seafire MkIII…!) to go with the Corsair and Hellcat
(Norway - about to get the right map… Tirpitz and JG.5 here we come )
-
Genuinely don’t understand the desire for a global map…
- Model past, current and potential future conflict zones
-Model them well, with location specific terrain, detail and “character”
- 1
-
Compartments / flooding could be simplified along the lines of focstle, midships, aft - to allow bow or stern first sinking, port / starboard for list / capsize.
Perhaps separate damage hit boxes for magazines, machinery spaces and CV avgas bunkers
I guess hull and deck playing would need an “Armour” value that would repel or be defeated by set ordnance. Below waterline hits should be able to cause flooding damage
- 1
-
12 hours ago, Mogster said:
WW2
Extend The Channel map East, Belgium, Holland and Germany.
Mediterranean, Malta, Sicily, Tunisia
Solomon Islands
Absolutely yes - for each and every one of these
- 1
-
I have just installed OB on a new system…
Having a reasonably stocked hangar, I don’t want to start from scratch with custom controller assignments for each aircraft
will all my existing settings copy across to the new PC if I copy the user\saved games files across to the new system??
-
On 1/6/2024 at 2:53 AM, Oban said:
These cruisers are festooned with AAA, it's going to be pretty difficult to penetrate their defences lol
Yep… given the gunnery accuracy in DCS… even the S-Boat and Type VII U Boat are very difficult to attack
BUT - absolutely delighted to see these and CV-6. Great stuff ED
(can we hope for some Fletchers…?)
- 2
-
11 minutes ago, speed-of-heat said:
If you can get a x3d that would give you better overall performance…. Nothing is really future proof…
Lazy typing… Ryzen 7900X3D
-
Current system feeling long in the tooth, despite various upgrades…
Looking at a system based around a Ryzen 7900 / RTX4080
Future proof, adequate, or better bang for buck elsewhere???
Any thoughts appreciated
-
3 hours ago, =Buccaneer= said:
Do you know why Guzz is called Guzz F1GHTS-ON?
Depends on which story you sign up to…
- 1
-
3 hours ago, F1GHTS-ON said:
is it too soon to suggest that RAZBAM just focus on the Pompey based ships and not bother with the Guzz based ships? ( awaiting incoming! )
-
2 hours ago, xflyer said:
In '82, correct. Shortly after that they stuck an AEW radar on a Sea King, which would be a nice asset for the Invincible.
Yes, I remember the Sea King AEWs being tested, probably something like summer 82 - IIRC we joked about them being flying dustbins
-
I think AWACS is a reasonable concession…
RN didn’t have AEW - to the expense of Sheffield… Destroyers and frigates were stationed as radar pickets - as were the SSNs, apparently (well passive watch rather than radar I’d guess)
-
2 hours ago, C3PO said:
Thank you all for your replies - was only thinking of the AV-8B in the Falklands within the capabilities that it has … ie no A2A etc apart from Aim-9s….could still be fun.
It’s a good point, and worthwhile to try…
I have tried setting up missions from Invincible, but the AV-8B is limited to the ground attack type roles in the Mission Editor… I might try setting “none” in the mission role picklist and head off with a pair of sidewinders
-
My personal view…
… it all revolves around the Sea Harrier
Getting the SHAR modelled unlocks the whole of the 1982 scenario
With a block on the SHAR, 1982 becomes a bit pointless for air ops…(and the whole S Atlantic map concept starts to unravel)
Raz claim that the radar system isn’t possible due to security classification… which may well be true, but some limited “Joe Public” type internet wanderings suggest there should be info and SMEs for the 1970s Blue Fox radar in the FRS.1
(I almost wonder if civil servants at UK MoD are responding to Sea Harrier data requests on the basis of the later and genuinely sensitive Blue Vixen radar from the Sea Harrier FA.2…???)
-
The old MAW mod for CFS was a good template (Mediterranean Air War) - loved the dessert / med camo schemes.
Quite a big area… Tunisia to Alexandria on the coast, south into the Sahara, north to Malta, Sicily and Southern Italy
An then there’s also an excellent plane set to pick from as well
(I’d actually favour this to BoB, which could feel very samey to what we already have)
- 2
-
Has there been any info on how far north this map will extend?
Will we get sea ice?
Svalbard???
The original post has a map with W, E and S limits shown… -
37 minutes ago, Gorn_GER said:
But wasn't GB using the GR.1(A) and GR.3 in the Falklands war? As i can see this version never got an AA Radar. Just with the knowledge of that war, Royal Airforce began to put Radars into Harriers for Sea Harrier FA.2 in 1988, some years after the Falkland war?
Best approach here is to understand that the Harrier and Sea Harrier are very different aircraft with different roles and developed for different users.
The Harrier I family (AV-8A in US) were developed for the RAF - mainly intended for forward area battlefield ops. No A2A radar.
The Sea Harrier was developed from the Harrier for the Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm (F.A.A.) - always intended as a fleet air defence fighter after the Ark Royal / Phantom FG.1s were withdrawn.
The first Sea Harrier FRS.1 (FRS = fighter, recon, strike) was equipped with Blue Fox A2A radar and AIM-9 (9L for Falklands conflict)
The upgraded Sea Harrier FA.2 was still based on the Harrier I airframe (with most FRS1s upgraded to FA2). The FA2 was equipped with the very capable (and highly classified) Blue Vixen radar, AIM-9s and AMRAAMs.
Both Sea Harrier variants are a totally different proposition to the standard Harrier GR series. The OP ( @C3PO ) quotes Sharkey Ward’s Sea Harrier book - which outlines how his Sea Harrier unit cleaned the floor with a US F-5 Aggressor unit as well as with contemporary F-15Cs… and the Sea Harrier joins the F-15 as the only two jets with an unblemished kill to loss ratio
Our DCS AV-8B is the upgraded MDD BAE Harrier II airframe… equivalent to the RAF GR5 / GR9…. Still mud movers and not equivalent to the Sea Harrier “family”
- 1
-
45 minutes ago, Northstar98 said:
I'm assuming they're referring to the lack of surface clutter (which can be quite noticeable).
Either that or @TripRodriguez has only flown over the Falklands…
(I’ve never been, but on the often stated similarity to Dartmoor, I’d assume the subdued moorland terrain and brown tones are pretty representative)
- 1
Tornado
in IndiaFoxtEcho
Posted · Edited by rkk01
Have also just seen the CGAviator Tonka video on YT… absolutely blown away, especially Mach Loop and the recovery to Valley
Very impressive IFE - needs to be in DCS…
(frustratingly little shown for the other 3rd party DCS version - potential for a partnership approach???)