Jump to content

HAE5904

Members
  • Posts

    86
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About HAE5904

  • Birthday 09/29/1965

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    FSX/P3D both with TP
    DCS.... of course
  • Interests
    Aviation....whatelse!!
  1. You definitely didn't read the posts, it's that obvious. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  2. If you take in account that the modeler didn't took a Russian Farmer as an example, but one from a different country where they used a 3 digit number..... Than it's not a bug at all. Maybe the modeler will change the dynamic numbering system. See my answer to the post made by Urbi. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  3. Thanks Urbi, I'll pass them on to the one who made them. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  4. LMAO Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  5. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=167068 Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  6. First of all, this is a bug reporting thread about the Mig-19P. Secondly, the Op is suggesting, and not reporting a bug. Keep suggestions OUT of the bug reporting please. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  7. And you apperantly doesn't know who I am. LOL. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  8. You forget this module is a Mig-19P,....not a Mig-19S/F6 the VPAP used. So a 4 digit number was and still is not a neccity. Just saying. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  9. HAE5904

    RN 24

    Or just... eject before the RN24 detonates, because we are super pilots and can withstand the 10K nuke blast.....unfortunately not your MIG. LOL Not realistic ofcourse, but for sightseeing purposes.
  10. Yes, that's one thing ED needs to fix. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  11. I know, I only replied to his picture explaining the difference, as he only posted the pics, without any explaining text. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  12. LOL, then YOU simply don't understand the answer I gave, you're mixing up different posts dude... Read before you give any reply. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  13. Wow, history ain't your thing is it? Ukraine was in time of the USSR part of it, and only became independent when the USSR/Warchau-Pact dissolved. So, being Warchau-Pact all equipment were provided as an unified USSR to defend themselves. This also answer your L-39 question, the trainer was developed as a Warchau-Pact basic/advanced trainer, no matter where it originated, as long as it was part of the Soviet Union / USSR / Warchau-Pact. That's why it is usually referred to as a Russian plane, as Russia was the big boss of the the USSR/Warchau-Pact. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  14. USSR is the Soviet Union,, Russia in the pic should be referred as CIS, in other words, the Russia AFTER the demise of the Warchau -Pact & USSR. Don't you ever had history lessons? Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
  15. ?? Soviet = USSR = Russia. This may answer your not so clear question. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...