Jump to content

zantron

Members
  • Posts

    125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by zantron

  1. I'm just curious, what's the general player balance? looking at the scores on the website, axis have more players?
  2. i think realistically speaking comrades we should suggest aircraft that would fit in era wise with other modules and doesnt require a US or Russian secret clearance to get info on so my opinion, what id like to see WWII/late 40s: any axis fighter, esp pacific -also- P-80 Korea/50s Saab 29 70s-80s F-16A any mig 29 varient
  3. rather get the remaining western front fighters and some pacific stuff (and a b-25), all potentially years away, first... agreed, im not opposed to mismatched planes and maps, but this is supposed to be DCS WWII and if players of WWII sims are going to be attracted to DCS then we need a bonfide WWII sim...
  4. Sadly no as well, rather get more jets or ww2 planes (axis western front or pacfic pls) or resources towards a map Honestly at this point only future aircraft id be interested in, besides f-14, is 40s and 50s era fighters or axis fighters ( cough cough japan cough cough) Oh f-4e too but i guess manufacturer says no
  5. when they made the 3d cockpits for the su-25a, su27 and mig29, they must of put in the "skeletons" or like the absolute basics or whatever the programming/animation talk is to one day make the switches working for a future clickable cockpit, at least i would hope a asm Su-27S this would pretty much be *the* dcs plane i would fly... pls ed
  6. this is off topic comrades but i thought there were some differences between a F14A pit and a mid 90s F14b? i know different engines, but i thought in addition i thought the b type had a mfd or two (im talking b not d) in there along with slightly different panels, or am i totally wrong ?
  7. good luck with that engine management without a copilot and engineer and while keeping fps at a playable rate with the game simulating the guts of 4 giant radials besides ive read several times, doesnt dcs engine only allow two engines or something? @pharoah, i think b-25 maybe best :D
  8. zantron

    F-15E?

    it is on hold for a while (probably year at least) until ED comes out with a ground radar, in meantime theyre making Av-8b harrier and tucano
  9. as much as i like bombers, i think best fit for the sim would be a twin engine plane like B-26, A-20 or A-26... can do both strategic bombing and tactical bombing also i wonder too when it comes to third party, for large multi engine planes like b-17 if a more FC3 style is way to go
  10. if the masses dont mind a speculative airplane then go for it (personalty id be ecstatic for DCS F-23 or F-32 :D), but for the needed realism we're more likely to get data needed for such sim on a modern russian aircraft than a modern iranian f-14
  11. ohhh i hope that third one is the one they put in for default russia
  12. comrades we need bulgarian , slovak and romanian as well!
  13. yes very interested (now that i got a work bonus!!) still making?
  14. cool! first campaign since the ultimate argument im buying, and first one full price :D btw pdfs working fine for me
  15. hey guys i fly mig 15 (well did, havent been on few months because of school work) but ill go up with you guys, be cool to get a group of english speaking mig 15 pilots fur ill text you on steam later, my steam is zandalf
  16. really cool! thanks! i would love to get more ace combat skins (pref. from 5 and zero) both for modules and AI like this :)
  17. I habe heard people toss around ideas of two engines bombers b-25 or a-26 A-26 would go great too in a vietnam
  18. i would love su-25a to be fully modeled, i kind wonder why it hasnt, id think probably the simplest of them to do
  19. so im curious, your radar is still on main monitor? (this is how i do it normally, edit the lua or whatever to display the transparent radar, dont have hawgtouch or anything set up on mine but preparing to make a "ghetto" pit and want a second monitor for my instrument panel)
×
×
  • Create New...