blackasdf

Thank you for the straight answer, it's good to hear that you are looking into the problem!

Not following this logic. We have reports of real world pilots that the HUD is fully visible. It was fully visible before the update and now it's not. It is apparent that for you this is not an issue. It would be nice to be treated as customers with an issue on a product we bought, instead of straight ignoring the problem by saying "it works for me". A straight answer would be much appreciated, again, as paying customers.

I think that the advantages of VR are clear to everyone, the point here is that even if the geometry, the head positioning etc etc were wrong before this patch, you have now "fixed" something that was forgotten for many many years, and it was working better for almost everyone except for VR users. As usual, we are going to fly it, work around limitations and people is going to defend your choices no matter what, but i'm sure that you can clearly see the before and after difference and deep down you know it was better playable before these updates.

This community is really lucky to have some people with real world experience and instead we rely on beliefs. Do you really think that the real world jet has a messed up HUD like we have now or it's more likely that with the new geometries of the cockpit the HUD rendering is now messed up? Just because ED did something you like, doesn't mean it's how it should be. (and we know from people with real world experience that the HUD is fully visible in the jet) Also, if i follow your thinking, why does the HUD fit the whole HUD frame in VR now and it's only messed up in 2D (messed up exactly how it was in VR since this patch). You should express your appreciation if you like something, this doesn't mean that you should convince yourself that new problems are instead features and real characteristics of the jet.

Well, i don't like this sterile look but that is personal preference and i don't think it's an issue as hopefully modders will came to the rescue. The real problem here is the HUD, can't see a full hud anymore in 2D, both top/bottom and left right. You can even see it in ED screenshot on Facebook. Yes, you can move the camera forward and then zoom out to try and "recenter" the HUD but it's not the same. For someone that flies almost only in the A10, this is a very sad day!

Hey, just finished the campaign. I got shivers while taxing to parking spot. I bought the mirage during prepurchase and never flown it since, just came back to it couple of weeks ago. All i can say is that this campaign is worth the module and the whole DCS World. I played the enemy within as soon as it came out before you it went "official" so i knew that having a campaign made by Baltic Dragon was a guarantee. Outstanding work, once again.

Worked, wingmen start up correctly without autostart, comms are good. Unfortunately still nothing happens during patrol.

Mission 6 is still broken after last update, you can get your wingmen to start the jet only if you use autostart, but they do not communicate over the radio and nothing happens in the mission after 15 minutes of loiter between the FOBs.

Thank you for your help!

Ah, too bad! I was really enjoying this!

Hello, in mission 5 the Chinook just hovers and spins over the blue smoke and does not land, i've waited 15 min and then decided to RTB. I have it on stream if u need to take a look at it. Thanks for your help, the campaign is great so far.

Thank you all for the info! @Twobells your zoom in slowly function works with the oculus? Mine doesnt :mad:

The position is fine by me, i'm just trying to work around the fact that is not possible to zoom out like you do when you are not using the Oculus

I'm adjusting just fore/aft, for the vertical adjustment i'm raising/lowering the seat

Hey, i find the standard view a little bit too close to the instrument panel and the hud, i've tried to move the viewpoint with camera controls and found a good position where my body is aligned with the airplane seat. The problem is that the hud doesn't scale, so when i move the viewpoint back i'm only able to see a small portion of the hud, is there a way to "move" the pov and having the hud scale down? thanks

Hey all, this is a simple .xml for Tacview for the HI-ILS or LOC/DME Z RWY 21L that can be useful for training purposes. Every waypoint is placed with the correct coordinates and naming according to the charts available from Skyvector. I plan to add every instrument approach and departure for Nellis, hopefully u'll find it useful. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B44e1TPdDglpcmlXeVNCeXNOT00

Can't really say much about the plane, we aren't in a good relationship :D But when baltic dragon makes a campaign you can be sure it will be one of the most fun and immersive thing you can ever play in DCS. Simple as that. If u ever played the enemy within for the A10-C you know what i'm talking about, if u didnt prepare yourself to experience a whole new level of fun. So in the end, IF you are not impressed by the module itself Baltic Dragon's campaign will make it worth the money :)

like 20 minutes, no radio traffic from tower, just AI flights announcing their positions, usually when i move without getting proper clearance i can see the status change from the radio menu like u said, but i'm not getting any kind of response or menu change this time.

Yes i ment i can't receive start-up and taxi clearance, my wingmen won't move, i'm gonna try reset the campaign, thanks!

After patch, on mission 3, Nellis ATC doesn't answer and my AI package does not takeoff

Red Flag Mission 3 - need help Hello boys! I'm really enjoying the campaign so far although i'm kinda stuck on mission 3, i've done it a couple of times and it seems that i'm missing something. I've tried it again today and it went really well, i even got a medal, but still no mission success. After the engagements against the migs i capped steer 10 and 11 for 30 minutes and nothing happened, so i decided to hit the tanker and i ended up smashing into it after some time... Here is the link to the acmi, it's 25mb cause it's 1 hour and 20 minutes of flight, if u could be kind enough to take a look at it and give me a hint to complete the mission i'd really appreciate it! https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B44e1TPdDglpZENmRTNEM293M0k/view?usp=sharing Thank you.

I know this is an old but, just wanted to say thank you because your solution works great and it's perfect.

Hello! Thank you for writing this awesome script, i'm almost a total "virgin" to the mission editor and i was able to make it work, almost! I have a problem with bombing targets, i've placed a trigger zone over an object, both were named conventional1, and "conventional1" was added to the "zone names" list. When i bomb the target the script recognize it as target1 and not as the name of the object and trigger zone (conventional1) i specified. I didnt place any other trigger zone for this test, so i'm confused. Could you help me by any chance? Thank you!

You are not supposed to criticize this module, otherwise you will be jumped by lots of people saying that nothing is wrong with this. (what a joke) You are supposed to say that everything is gorgeous and extremely well made even if u dont like it. You are supposed to enjoy this fake fantasy airplane with the skin of a mirage 2000 and say that you wish you've payed more for this module, 50 bucks are too low price for such a masterpiece. Fortunately the people who created the A10C were not thinking like the majority of you fanboys, otherwise we would have a mediocre module with unrealistic behaviour and cockpit, instead of the marvel we have now. The quality of modules like the A10C should be used as a reference for all the third party developers, let's be honest, the mirage 2000C quality is not even close to it. Razbam delivered a slightly more complex FC3 module with clickable cockpit, not much more, feel free to jump me cause you think it's not true, you like the module and for you it's so good... I'm sorry, but you are either a casual simmer or in complete denial.

This is exactly the point. Angry comments are just like the people who write them, USELESS. I'd love to reply to some very clever and helpful guys like Doctor Nonsense, but i'm not in the mood for easy trolling, especially when it comes to casual users. Let me just apologize in advance for all the keywords you are gonna read in this reply, but apparently some fundamental aspects are being overlooked. Dear Zeus, you are missing something here... Maybe it's because you are kinda new to the game of developing and supporting your own product or maybe it's just bad attitude. BMS publish free content, top quality content, but the keyword is FREE. We are paying customers here, keyword is $$$, and the game you decided to throw yourself in is called simulation, a pretty "real world data" thirsty enviroment. Noone is talking trash about your work (although i COULD complain because i PAYED for this product), we are just asking for information about the product we bought (sorry to remind it again, but you are not BMS). Getting customers frustrated because you didnt like something someone wrote about your product, is not a good strategy. Less is more when you cant really answer something in a proper way with solid data backing up your answer, especially when there is money involved. People is happy about the mirage? Good for you, i like it too, but you need to provide as much data as you possibly could, clear and concise explanation of what and how not emotion driven answers. Otherwise you could simply choose not to answer this kind of topics and enjoy the posts from the people that aren't worried because "the flying is fine" and "everything will be perfect once the beta ends". Last but not least, good attitude keeps customers satisfied, a satisfied customer is a returning customer. I'm done, i'm leaving space for the fanboys to flame this topic while we won't get any answer because some guy from BMS already did all the work and is absolutely perfect and great and the cyrillic version is somehow CLOSE to what we bought. Wow...