XeNoise

Once again, Nine, there was nothing wrong with your communication, it was actually helpful and i thank you for letting us know. FC4 is not meant for us and that's totally fine, it servers it's own purpose and the health of the sim is a priority for all of us. There is no issue at all with this and i don't think that anyone will blame ED for developing it. The only issue was with the first announcement which could have been more explicit about the fact that it won't contain new aircraft, obviously people will think of new planes and the possibility of FC versions of existing and fully modeled modules didn't even came to our mind. Therefore i think that blaming the community for building hype is wrong and unprofessional, it's important to analyze what went wrong and in best case do it better next time. Nobody will hold a grudge here.

I can't really agree, not with you, nor with the incredibly funny guy replying with a meme which took 2 minutes to create. If only i was disappointed i would totally get it, but since many users are upset then maybe there is a reason for it? Simply blaming the community itself seems very silly to me, maybe you should look at the whole situation and analyze what went wrong. Sure, nobody said there will be new aircraft but on the other hand no one said there won't. But ok, yes. It's my fault because i didn't think about the eventuality of a FC4 with dumbed down versions of already existing modules. I think one reason why i didn't even think about this possibility is because first of all there are many planes which are still classified and cannot be modelled entirely but would still make great FC-level planes. Secondly it was a good opportunity to expand the park of planes, giving us more choice. As a third reason i would say if FC4 would offer new content it would sell well also among us experienced users. You are missing the point with that last sentence, now that i know FC4 is not meant for me i won't buy it obviously.

1. This was the perfect opportunity to add some new aircrafts to the park with much less work than a full module would require. 2. This was the perfect opportunity to give us the chance to fly modern planes which are still largely classified. 3. It will be awesome to be shot down by someone flying the same aircraft just because this someone can skip action X and Y and therefore launch before you. You could argue that it's not much different with FC3 aircraft but at least you can expect it and act accordingly. I think eagle dynamics is a great company and software developer but for the first time I'm really disappointed about their choice. It's redundant and a sub-optimal allocation of resources. Moreover i'm actually slightly pissed because the announcement wasn't clear enough and i was seriously hyped during the last days.

Also i wish the AB would be blue in night. Would look really nice.

I remember this and i hated it, i was also there trying to calm the people which were about (or were, in some cases) starting to get furious even if there was no fixed date, i don't speak about this. Again i was not criticising but i won't explain further, since you anyway missed the point of my post. :doh:

Yes so same thing, but for early access.

Sure? I think nevada and m2000c were delayed for a week or almost. Anyways it was meant in a positive way, was not a critic. :) Specially because no other product on this world can hype me that much like DCS, so it's something good even if painful. And no newsletter can replace a forum.

I see, i'll need to check the forum again like four times a day and every Friday hope that we will have a surprise. Actually we will, a surprise where they will reveal the release date, which will be delayed a week after while i will be literally (yes i know the significate of this word as well as how to use it and i mean it!) start to eat my face and speak about it to the people around me until 2.5 will finally be out.

What? No warping caused by lag?? This must be heaven, any info about when it will be implemented in 2.0? Or bigger question: any info abput when 2.0 and 1.5 will be finally merged? I was not active for quite some time :(

Doesn't matter, i will buy every jet starting from 3rd gen and higher. (Except most training jets, one will do the job) Aginor, i think i've accidentally reported you instead of posting. Stupid touchscreens. :(

Because you need huge balls and mad programming/organizational/modeling/scientifical skills to create a dcs world module. Fsx modules are a joke in comparison and way easier to create. So they will sell surely less, but it pays off because the work is maybe around 5% of the work which they would need to put in a dcs module.

This! It's the only thing RAZBAM did wrong. I'm not disappointed at all becuase they could have let us wait until IFF would be implemented (if they implement it next week it would be two months of waiting for example) and i really enjoyed to fly around until now, i just don't understand why it's called beta since really important stuff still needs to be done. Anyways, M-2000c will be the best plane in that game (for me) and i can't wait. :pilotfly:

I think it wouldn't, i recently upgraded from 8 gb to 16 and it gave huge improvements. If i have some programs in background + chrome with 5-10 tabs + dcs world it uses max 11.5gb so you should be fine. Still nttr might use even more ram soon.

if we are at it: in the movie you can hear warning sounds which i can't hear in dcs. Do you guys think that also those will be reproduced or does it affect only newer models? (2000d/n/5)

Geeeile sieech :D